Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
5/29/2015 9:53 PM LAST EDITED: 5/29/2015 10:09 PM
BRIGGS wrote:MaTT4281 wrote:Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:wargames wrote:I wonder is there any chance the knicks could move back to the #7 pick and grab either Winslow or WCS in a trade with Denver and get a draft pick back for their trouble? Right now Denver has 3 first round picks in 2016. Their own with the NY swap option along with Memphis and Portland's first round picks too. Another possible trade theory I've seen on the knicks pick at #4 (mudiay) and then facilitate a trade with the Kings at #6 and the Nuggets at #7. The only reason its worth mentioning is Karl in Sacramento has been rumored to want Ty for the kings to run his offense and a 2 guard who is dynamic at shooting 3's. Its also clear Denver wants a new PG to lead their team and after Russell, Mudiay is the number 2 PG in this draft. Also while the knicks need a starting PG, they need one that can shoot the 3 and preferably is a veteran, but who isn't to old or expensive to be a liability or cap problem. http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=nmr4864 Knicks get Collison and Picks #6 and #7 (or instead of #7 one of the 3 2016 Denver 1st round Picks) Nuggets get a young back court with potential to become the West version of Wall and Beal if they develop them right. If the knicks do get two 2015 picks If the knicks get pick #6 take Winslow or Heznonia Trade WCS to Boston for a combination of 2015 and 2016 picks. Basically the knicks get at least 2 - 3 picks and 1 player (possibly more) for Mudiay at #4. The reason it works for the knicks is honestly beyond position or system fit the knicks just need players. Now while they missed out on a definite star all those picks will definitely help them build a improved team using both draft and cap space going forward and maybe they could luck up into a star next year. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
5/29/2015 10:33 PM
wargames wrote:BRIGGS wrote:MaTT4281 wrote:Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:wargames wrote:I wonder is there any chance the knicks could move back to the #7 pick and grab either Winslow or WCS in a trade with Denver and get a draft pick back for their trouble? Right now Denver has 3 first round picks in 2016. Their own with the NY swap option along with Memphis and Portland's first round picks too. Is this a fan generated trade or based on any actual rumors floating around. I've read that Lawson might be dissatisfied in Denver, and he did well matching up with Karl. Interesting to think about. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 2/18/2010 Member: #3075 |
5/29/2015 11:17 PM
wargames wrote: that is probably the greatest fake trades i've seen so far... couple minor issues: a)the key for us is having winslow fall.. if he doesn't.. i would not do this... hezonja is quite possibly throwing away the pick... |
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
5/29/2015 11:25 PM LAST EDITED: 5/31/2015 9:05 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:wargames wrote:BRIGGS wrote:MaTT4281 wrote:Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:wargames wrote:I wonder is there any chance the knicks could move back to the #7 pick and grab either Winslow or WCS in a trade with Denver and get a draft pick back for their trouble? Right now Denver has 3 first round picks in 2016. Their own with the NY swap option along with Memphis and Portland's first round picks too. The knicks haven't been attached to denver or sacremento but both teams have been attahced to trade rumors. Its based on actual rumors http://sacramento.suntimes.com/sacramento-kings/7/138/71568/sacramento-kings-ty-lawson Kings want Lawson but they really don't have anything the Nuggets want to do the trade for. the Nuggets have the 7th pick but the top 2 PG's will be off the board so if they trade for Ty to the kings the kings won't have a PG of his level to send back. Lastly the knicks keep talking about Winslow and now WCS who are usually mentioned at #6 and #7. Its all theory of course but it could happen. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
5/29/2015 11:35 PM LAST EDITED: 5/30/2015 1:09 AM
FistOfOakley wrote:wargames wrote: A lot of it depends on the fact Denver has 3 future first picks in 2016 that could sweeten the deal. The trade could maybe give the knicks Collison, #6 and #7 and Denver sends a 2016 pick to the kings (and still have 2 first round picks next year) or maybe as I said the knicks take Collison #6 and a future pick and Denver sends the kings 7 (and denver would still have 2 first round picks in 2016). Lawson, Hardaway, and future first for #6 is a good deal and it is a great deal for the kings if they get Lawson and Hardway to move from #6 to #7 (and the knicks take the 2016 pick). There are multiple ways it could go down and using the TPE's all 3 teams have and Denvers collection of picks its actually possible. As for denver for the price of Lawson and 2 picks they get Mudiay, 2 young SG's, and a vet to work with Mudiay in Calderon. Its not a bad trade for them either and would make them a young (cheap) team quickly and they would still have 2 1st round picks in 2016. If the knicks do take WCS at #7 to trade. Boston has made it known they want to trade up for him. Rumors say they think he would work great with K Love their top FA target (which I think is true). The knicks should be able to get a collection of picks and players from them since it would be a #9 spot jump. Boston has 11 first round picks between now and 2018. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
5/30/2015 12:04 AM
FistOfOakley wrote:wargames wrote: Winslow's availability or non-availability at 6 would not be a game changer for me. If he is gone at 6, and the gang of four- Towns, Russell, OK4, and Mudiay are already gone, then you have folks like Kaminsky, Porzingis, or Hezonja. If he is there, then either Kaminsky or Porzingis are probably off the board, and you could take Winslow and remaining one of those two, or even Stein, who I am not a fan of. Read something where the Mavs and Lawson are both interested in one another, by the way. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
5/30/2015 12:14 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:FistOfOakley wrote:wargames wrote: Lawson has 2 more years on his contract and yeah I want Winslow too but like I said knicks need players and literally in that trade it comes down to Orlando at #5. It is definitely a risk though The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
shinmen
Posts: 20298 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/7/2015 Member: #6029 France |
5/30/2015 3:11 AM
wargames wrote:BRIGGS wrote:MaTT4281 wrote:Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:wargames wrote:I wonder is there any chance the knicks could move back to the #7 pick and grab either Winslow or WCS in a trade with Denver and get a draft pick back for their trouble? Right now Denver has 3 first round picks in 2016. Their own with the NY swap option along with Memphis and Portland's first round picks too. I would love for this to happen but I definitely would keep WCS. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
5/30/2015 3:55 AM
The worst move for me would be trading our pick for a veteran
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
5/30/2015 6:43 AM LAST EDITED: 5/30/2015 6:44 AM
Yahoo Sports rankings of best shooters in the draft
https://sports.yahoo.com/news/ranking-the-2015-nba-draft-s-top-shooters-012046574.html Rankings: 1 Mario Hezonja Hezonja, Porzingis and Kaminsky are interesting because the knicks could trade down and pick one of those guys up. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
5/30/2015 8:38 AM
Here is links to past trades
http://www.nba.com/news/2013-trade-tracker/ here is a link for draft trades as far back as 1953
If Indy wants Trill it would take a swap and a future 1st rd pick and 2015 2nd plus them taking Calderon. If its Boston its a Trill for their entire 2015 draft and Calderon dump. |
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
5/30/2015 12:29 PM
wargames wrote:Yahoo Sports rankings of best shooters in the draft Yeah...saw that article, too- had a number of other shooting breakdowns, too, I think. Very good for reference. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
5/30/2015 12:34 PM
Nalod wrote:VCoug wrote:Good article on Knickerblogger about Porzingis: http://knickerblogger.net/what-if-with-the-4th-pick-the-knicks-draft-kristaps-porzingis/ It was funny, though. Did one on Hezonja, too. Might be Europhobic. The memory of Freddy Weis runs deep and long for some. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|