[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

A Very Good Read From Bergen Record on Phil & Fish
Author Thread
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

1/17/2015  3:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/17/2015  3:37 PM
Interesting what was said about Calderon below

Wonder if anyone catches the contradiction


The early points hit home

The Mavs and Cavs trades were awful like really really awful


Phil Jackson stood in front of the world a week ago and took the blame for the Knicks’ predicament on his shoulders, admitting that he had bungled the building of the roster that had stumbled to a 5-36 record.

As hard as it may have been for Jackson, who has crafted an image tethered to the mystique of the triangle offense and the tangible clang of 11 championship rings, to admit he was wrong, that was the easy part. Tearing down a roster is far easier than building it up.

Jackson has pared problems and talent from the Knicks roster, but done it with a clumsy chainsaw rather than a surgeon’s scalpel. To get rid of Raymond Felton he paired him with one of the few valuable assets, Tyson Chandler. To shed J.R. Smith’s $6.4 million player option for next season he gave up Iman Shumpert and got nothing back but a 2019 second-round pick and salary cap exceptions.

What he is left with now is not only a roster that has prompted the networks to dump one of their nationally televised games after another, but a 16-game losing streak and a team at the halfway mark of the season that is challenging the 1972-73 Philadelphia 76ers record of 9-73, the worst mark in NBA history. And it’s not just the losses, but how they are losing — with a group of marginally talented, lackadaisical players who aren’t even keeping it close anymore. A 45-point deficit to Charlotte hours after Jackson spoke may have been the worst, but they’ve been down by double figures in the past 15 games and have trailed by at least 30 in four games, an unlikeable and unwatchable mess.

Among Jackson’s parting shots Saturday were an admission that the deep pockets of James Dolan and Cablevision weren’t enough to fix the problems and that he was ready to do the job he was brought here to do. But in his first year as Knicks’ president he has quickly learned the job is not as easy as handing the ball to Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant.

These are new lessons for Jackson, who has seen reality slap him in the face. The job may be harder than he thought and maybe it is harder than he can even imagine now. We reached out to a front office official from another NBA team, a pro scout and an agent to seek out unbiased — OK, outside — opinions.

Their take? There is blame to go around. The roster is an ill-fitting disaster. While Jackson tried to take the pressure off of coach Derek Fisher, the scout pointed out, “I think Derek is responsible. They don’t guard at all. You can be competitive with a bad team.” No one is unscathed at 5-36.

What Went Wrong?

Jackson inherited a team that won 37 games — and many pieces of the 54-win team of two years ago — and his first move was to decide what to do with the star free agent, Carmelo Anthony. Rather than bottom out after firing coach Mike Woodson, Jackson blinked and handed Anthony a five-year, $124 million deal to be the centerpiece of the organization — with a no-trade clause. He then tagged his next best asset, Chandler, into a deal to unload Felton.

“Phil is right — this is his fault,” said a scout. “He took this job like, ‘I’m here, everything will be great.’ And then he gave away the assets he had.”

Jackson stripped down the roster and gathered precious few assets in return. That leaves the Knicks with a roster that has very few pieces any other franchise would want.

“The value of these guys were decimated after what’s happening,” said a front office executive. “All the assets value was not there, not working, so he cleaned out. I know it’s easier to get rid of people. The next part is the hardest part, getting good players to come forward. This is a process and it’s not happening overnight.”

One of the observers said that Calderon is the only keeper on the roster, not because he’s played well — he hasn’t — since coming over in the Chandler trade, but dealing away one of the few professionals left on the roster just opens another hole.

“His money is not crazy,” the executive said. “It’s a decent, fair contract and you can say, ‘I have my point guard,’ and address other positions because every one other than Carmelo is a problem.”

The Path Forward

The faith in Phil is what the Knicks ownership and fans are clinging to and he is armed with more than $30 million in salary cap space this summer as well as a first round draft pick that figures to be in the top four spots. But as one of the subjects said, “I was talking to a general manager from another team and he said, ‘Are you going to trust the guys who put that roster together to make the draft pick and pick the free agents?’”

There was unanimous agreement that the Knicks roster is barren after Anthony. One marveled at how Hardaway Jr. has struggled and the scout pegged Calderon as ideally a backup on a good team. Quincy Acy and Travis Wear at least drew some shrugs that they could possibly be a bench player on an improved team and Lance Thomas, with a 10-day contract, was pointed to as the type of blue-collar bench player they could use.

There was one more unanimous agreement — that the team should just waive Andrea Bargnani. “Get him out of the locker room, off the team,” the front office official said, casting doubt on whether Bargnani will even be able to get a veteran minimum deal on another team.

The Knicks right now are on track for the most ping-pong balls in the draft lottery — and if Anthony opts for surgery they aren’t about to get better. So will Duke center Jahlil Okafor solve the problems? Kentucky’s Karl Towns? Emmanuel Mudiay, who opted to play in China rather than in college?

As tempting as it is to grab for the brass ring, one of the officials suggested trading down if they get one of the top picks to get more talent because there are so few pieces in place to build with. But the Knicks, in need of something for fans to cling to, are unlikely to do that, and as the scout noted, this is not expected to be a deep draft.

Free agency presents a similar dilemma. There are several free agents that the Knicks and their fans can dream about, but landing a Marc Gasol or LaMarcus Aldridge is a long shot. The agent — as much as agents enjoy it — cautioned that the Knicks need to avoid overpaying for second-tier talent: “They can’t do what they always do — get tied up in deals you don’t want.”

The scout agreed, noting, “If they were to get Gasol, all right, then you have ’Melo, Gasol and the rest of those misfits. You’re better, but you’re not there. Keep your cap room available. Don’t overspend on a mediocre player and fill in the holes.”


The Bargnani snipit is so pure and full of win

Spot on about trading down I was one of the first to mention this


As a real plan B because we never really had a plan A

Spot on about overpaying a "SHOWING OUT STIFF" in Monroe


Or "I'M PLAYING FOR MY NEXT CONTRACT SO HARD" Jackson

Good to see them not mention passing on Crack Baby was a monumental error


Maybe the only thing Phil got right this year

AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/17/2015  3:47 PM
I see us targeting 2nd tier guys who can turn into 1st tier guys soon. Dragic is close. Monroe and Harris possibly could in a couple of years. We might not be able to steal someone else's top tier guy, but how about finding a future one. Draft the right player and find the right free agents under 30 that can help Melo now but still have room to improve. Although Dragic is going to be 29, I mention him in that group because I feel he is a late bloomer who will age well similar to Nash. But the options aren't as simple as missing 1st tier guys and avoiding 2nd tier guys. There are future stars in that group we just need to identify.
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

1/17/2015  4:06 PM
You can be competitive with a bad team

I made the same exact point in one of my posts. Fisher is HORRIBLE

Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/17/2015  5:26 PM
F500ONE wrote:Interesting what was said about Calderon below

Wonder if anyone catches the contradiction


The early points hit home

The Mavs and Cavs trades were awful like really really awful


Phil Jackson stood in front of the world a week ago and took the blame for the Knicks’ predicament on his shoulders, admitting that he had bungled the building of the roster that had stumbled to a 5-36 record.

As hard as it may have been for Jackson, who has crafted an image tethered to the mystique of the triangle offense and the tangible clang of 11 championship rings, to admit he was wrong, that was the easy part. Tearing down a roster is far easier than building it up.

Jackson has pared problems and talent from the Knicks roster, but done it with a clumsy chainsaw rather than a surgeon’s scalpel. To get rid of Raymond Felton he paired him with one of the few valuable assets, Tyson Chandler. To shed J.R. Smith’s $6.4 million player option for next season he gave up Iman Shumpert and got nothing back but a 2019 second-round pick and salary cap exceptions.

What he is left with now is not only a roster that has prompted the networks to dump one of their nationally televised games after another, but a 16-game losing streak and a team at the halfway mark of the season that is challenging the 1972-73 Philadelphia 76ers record of 9-73, the worst mark in NBA history. And it’s not just the losses, but how they are losing — with a group of marginally talented, lackadaisical players who aren’t even keeping it close anymore. A 45-point deficit to Charlotte hours after Jackson spoke may have been the worst, but they’ve been down by double figures in the past 15 games and have trailed by at least 30 in four games, an unlikeable and unwatchable mess.

Among Jackson’s parting shots Saturday were an admission that the deep pockets of James Dolan and Cablevision weren’t enough to fix the problems and that he was ready to do the job he was brought here to do. But in his first year as Knicks’ president he has quickly learned the job is not as easy as handing the ball to Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant.

These are new lessons for Jackson, who has seen reality slap him in the face. The job may be harder than he thought and maybe it is harder than he can even imagine now. We reached out to a front office official from another NBA team, a pro scout and an agent to seek out unbiased — OK, outside — opinions.

Their take? There is blame to go around. The roster is an ill-fitting disaster. While Jackson tried to take the pressure off of coach Derek Fisher, the scout pointed out, “I think Derek is responsible. They don’t guard at all. You can be competitive with a bad team.” No one is unscathed at 5-36.

What Went Wrong?

Jackson inherited a team that won 37 games — and many pieces of the 54-win team of two years ago — and his first move was to decide what to do with the star free agent, Carmelo Anthony. Rather than bottom out after firing coach Mike Woodson, Jackson blinked and handed Anthony a five-year, $124 million deal to be the centerpiece of the organization — with a no-trade clause. He then tagged his next best asset, Chandler, into a deal to unload Felton.

“Phil is right — this is his fault,” said a scout. “He took this job like, ‘I’m here, everything will be great.’ And then he gave away the assets he had.”

Jackson stripped down the roster and gathered precious few assets in return. That leaves the Knicks with a roster that has very few pieces any other franchise would want.

“The value of these guys were decimated after what’s happening,” said a front office executive. “All the assets value was not there, not working, so he cleaned out. I know it’s easier to get rid of people. The next part is the hardest part, getting good players to come forward. This is a process and it’s not happening overnight.”

One of the observers said that Calderon is the only keeper on the roster, not because he’s played well — he hasn’t — since coming over in the Chandler trade, but dealing away one of the few professionals left on the roster just opens another hole.

“His money is not crazy,” the executive said. “It’s a decent, fair contract and you can say, ‘I have my point guard,’ and address other positions because every one other than Carmelo is a problem.”

The Path Forward

The faith in Phil is what the Knicks ownership and fans are clinging to and he is armed with more than $30 million in salary cap space this summer as well as a first round draft pick that figures to be in the top four spots. But as one of the subjects said, “I was talking to a general manager from another team and he said, ‘Are you going to trust the guys who put that roster together to make the draft pick and pick the free agents?’”

There was unanimous agreement that the Knicks roster is barren after Anthony. One marveled at how Hardaway Jr. has struggled and the scout pegged Calderon as ideally a backup on a good team. Quincy Acy and Travis Wear at least drew some shrugs that they could possibly be a bench player on an improved team and Lance Thomas, with a 10-day contract, was pointed to as the type of blue-collar bench player they could use.

There was one more unanimous agreement — that the team should just waive Andrea Bargnani. “Get him out of the locker room, off the team,” the front office official said, casting doubt on whether Bargnani will even be able to get a veteran minimum deal on another team.

The Knicks right now are on track for the most ping-pong balls in the draft lottery — and if Anthony opts for surgery they aren’t about to get better. So will Duke center Jahlil Okafor solve the problems? Kentucky’s Karl Towns? Emmanuel Mudiay, who opted to play in China rather than in college?

As tempting as it is to grab for the brass ring, one of the officials suggested trading down if they get one of the top picks to get more talent because there are so few pieces in place to build with. But the Knicks, in need of something for fans to cling to, are unlikely to do that, and as the scout noted, this is not expected to be a deep draft.

Free agency presents a similar dilemma. There are several free agents that the Knicks and their fans can dream about, but landing a Marc Gasol or LaMarcus Aldridge is a long shot. The agent — as much as agents enjoy it — cautioned that the Knicks need to avoid overpaying for second-tier talent: “They can’t do what they always do — get tied up in deals you don’t want.”

The scout agreed, noting, “If they were to get Gasol, all right, then you have ’Melo, Gasol and the rest of those misfits. You’re better, but you’re not there. Keep your cap room available. Don’t overspend on a mediocre player and fill in the holes.”


The Bargnani snipit is so pure and full of win

Spot on about trading down I was one of the first to mention this


As a real plan B because we never really had a plan A

Spot on about overpaying a "SHOWING OUT STIFF" in Monroe


Or "I'M PLAYING FOR MY NEXT CONTRACT SO HARD" Jackson

Good to see them not mention passing on Crack Baby was a monumental error


Maybe the only thing Phil got right this year

everything stems from his first "move." note that this tidbit comes under the part titled "what went wrong?" how do you seriously pursue "culture change" and retain this kind of employee with this kind of contract? seriously. this was a classic moment of disassociation on a collective scale, ie the other employees and the fanbase. the 5-36 record, this disaster of a season, is the result. the knicks can expect to have a nightmarish future.

this whole situation-- easily preventable-- screams bad karma and diminished opportunities and potentials.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/17/2015  5:59 PM
The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone. I'd remind you all that this is just one set of opinions about what happened and what lays ahead. It's not proof that this team will never get out of this mess and rebuild properly. The only long term commitments Phil made were to Melo and Jose. Outside of them he didn't lock himself into anything going forward. It really doesn't matter anymore what went wrong. All that matters is what can be done from here on out. Phil took a chance on one direction for this season and now he's scrapped that attempt and is going in a different direction. Once again he made no long term commitments outside of Melo and Jose. Contrary to popular opinion scrapping this plan and starting over was always an option if things failed. No more leftovers from previous regimes. Phil has the freedom to build it completely the way he sees fit.

The key here is that from here on Phil has to make positive that he adds quality to the roster starting with the draft and then in Free Agency. Having flexibility isn't a negative. All that lays ahead is opportunity. Make great decisions from here on and that solves the problem. There are no guarantees only the opportunity to get it right this time.

F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

1/17/2015  6:14 PM
dk7th wrote:everything stems from his first "move." note that this tidbit comes under the part titled "what went wrong?" how do you seriously pursue "culture change" and retain this kind of employee with this kind of contract? seriously. this was a classic moment of disassociation on a collective scale, ie the other employees and the fanbase. the 5-36 record, this disaster of a season, is the result. the knicks can expect to have a nightmarish future.

this whole situation-- easily preventable-- screams bad karma and diminished opportunities and potentials.

You know how you said "What has been said can't be unsaid", well the contract Phil signed Melo to can't be unsigned. I'm interested in how Phil can get himself out of the Abyss. You'd think they would have talked up the Early and Thanasis as being great ROI from trade with Dallas. I'll wait on the Calderon catch. Phil's recovery starts with acquiring picks by the deadline if he doesn't, then he's pretty much toast. Even if all get gets are 2nd rounders.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
1/17/2015  6:25 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Phil is gonna find out how the players of the NBA view him in about six months.
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
1/18/2015  10:46 AM
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/18/2015  10:51 AM
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Knicks1969
Posts: 25394
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2014
Member: #5915

1/18/2015  11:19 AM
Phil biggest mistake this season was the 5 year contract he offered Fisher. You can always trade a player; but when it comes to a coach, if you fire him, you have to eat his contract. As terrible as this dude is, we have no choice but to keep him around for at least another season.
Thank God Fisher is no longer our coach, now let's get Calderon out of here:)
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

1/18/2015  11:28 AM
Knicks1969 wrote:Phil biggest mistake this season was the 5 year contract he offered Fisher. You can always trade a player; but when it comes to a coach, if you fire him, you have to eat his contract. As terrible as this dude is, we have no choice but to keep him around for at least another season.

It's pretty funny that we took a just retired player and made him one of the highest paid coaches in the league. Personally, I would have gone after Shaka Smart or Fred Hoiberg but, OMG, neither one runs the triangle.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/18/2015  11:43 AM
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach

A lot of mediocre players become great coaches. Fisher certainly appeared to have the pedigree to be successful. He has been a part of teams that won championships. He is a good communicator and has been in a leadership role in the past. How different would things be if Kerr were in Ny? How different would things be in Golden State if Fish was there? Also, was Kerr more than a mediocre player?

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/18/2015  11:47 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach

A lot of mediocre players become great coaches. Fisher certainly appeared to have the pedigree to be successful. He has been a part of teams that won championships. He is a good communicator and has been in a leadership role in the past. How different would things be if Kerr were in Ny? How different would things be in Golden State if Fish was there? Also, was Kerr more than a mediocre player?

Kerr here would be miles better and fish in GS would make them a bit worse.

Kerr was a much much better and smarter player.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/18/2015  12:02 PM
VCoug wrote:
Knicks1969 wrote:Phil biggest mistake this season was the 5 year contract he offered Fisher. You can always trade a player; but when it comes to a coach, if you fire him, you have to eat his contract. As terrible as this dude is, we have no choice but to keep him around for at least another season.

It's pretty funny that we took a just retired player and made him one of the highest paid coaches in the league. Personally, I would have gone after Shaka Smart or Fred Hoiberg but, OMG, neither one runs the triangle.

Hoiberg! My top choice.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/18/2015  12:11 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/18/2015  12:32 PM
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach


So "tanking and drafting" counts as a direction for us but not for Philly? Regarding "trading drafted players," I don't think any team does that more than us.

*On edit: I was replying to Smackdog, not Mreinman

VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

1/18/2015  12:16 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach


So "tanking and drafting" counts as a direction for us but not for Philly? Regarding "trading drafted players," I don't think any team does that more than us.

Not to mention that Plan A was a complete, unmitigated disaster. Phil's tinkering that was supposed to make this a playoff team turned a 37-win team into a team on pace to win 10 games.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/18/2015  12:33 PM
VCoug wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach


So "tanking and drafting" counts as a direction for us but not for Philly? Regarding "trading drafted players," I don't think any team does that more than us.

Not to mention that Plan A was a complete, unmitigated disaster. Phil's tinkering that was supposed to make this a playoff team turned a 37-win team into a team on pace to win 10 games.


Yeah, "Plan B" isn't really a plan. It's the league's safety net for teams that completely screw up
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/18/2015  12:35 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach


So "tanking and drafting" counts as a direction for us but not for Philly? Regarding "trading drafted players," I don't think any team does that more than us.

Not to mention that Plan A was a complete, unmitigated disaster. Phil's tinkering that was supposed to make this a playoff team turned a 37-win team into a team on pace to win 10 games.


Yeah, "Plan B" isn't really a plan. It's the league's safety net for teams that completely screw up

and plan C will be to fire their coach.

How long do you think Fisher lasts?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/18/2015  12:46 PM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach

A lot of mediocre players become great coaches. Fisher certainly appeared to have the pedigree to be successful. He has been a part of teams that won championships. He is a good communicator and has been in a leadership role in the past. How different would things be if Kerr were in Ny? How different would things be in Golden State if Fish was there? Also, was Kerr more than a mediocre player?

Kerr here would be miles better and fish in GS would make them a bit worse.

Kerr was a much much better and smarter player.


Really. You think Kerr has this team winning more? What do you think his record would be? The Knicks essentially are running their summer league squad plus Calderon out there every night. (Opps, forgot about Amundson and Thomas).
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
VCoug
Posts: 24935
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2007
Member: #1406

1/18/2015  12:49 PM
mreinman wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
VCoug wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
TripleThreat wrote:
nixluva wrote:The problem I have with this and many other similar articles is the pessimistic tone.


The problem, nixluva, that you seem to ignore, even when it's shoved right in your face, is that this team and franchise needs a direction.

Philly has a direction. Tank and keep taking, amass assets, try to push forward their young talent and then try to get them to gel together while still on their rookie deals. Will it work? Will it not? Either way, it's a direction, the entire franchise is moving in the same direction from top to bottom. At least Philly fans can say they can see a plan in place that makes sense from a timetable and asset standpoint and how the league is structured in terms of the draft and free agency.

New York has NO DIRECTION. Tanking and rebuilding from the ground up is one thing. Trying to make a playoff push is another. Picking neither or picking one then ending up with the other by coincidence is not a plan. Melo makes this a treadmill team. The Chandler trade, even if it worked, would have made this a treadmill team. A team stuck on the fringes of that 8th playoff spot or that dreaded 9th spot with no real chance to get better.

You call people too negative but this is clearly a negative situation. Not making a choice is making a choice, often it's worse than picking Direction A or Direction B. At least in one of those cases, you have momentum and a trajectory and something to sell to your fans.

Tanking because your effort to make a push blew up in your face is not a sign of an organization that has a cohesive plan in place.

Nothing you conjure up fixes the timetable vs development vs assets problem nixluva. In order to build a roster around Melo, you need to use the draft. With no 2016 pick, and with picks actually needing time to develop, your "help" for Melo will arrive, if at all, when his contract ends and when he's out of what's left of his prime playing ability/years. Every other instance of getting him help on this spiraling franchise will likely mean a free agent overpay, which will doom the roster to the same kind of problems it's had for the last 15 years. Do you think the Dallas Cowboys really wanted to trade their only marketable and franchise player in Herschel Walker? They did it because of the assets vs development vs timetable issue.

You want to put a "label" on a type of tone? Well here it is son. You ignore things you don't want to hear or don't like. You don't fully understand the way the cap works or even consider what other people have to say unless it lines up to your viewpoint. You don't own any of the things you've said before previously. Then you talk down to everyone like they are stupid because they remember your needling hack job predictions. Then you blame everyone else when they have the audacity to have opinions of their own. I know an entire group of our population who act just like you. They are called women. The problem you have is you are in a room full of men, who think like men, and you act like a woman.


We have direction. Plan A: tinker with the roster and try to make the playoffs, then try to recruit a top FA like Gasol. Didn't work out so we're onto Plan B (clear salary, tank for a top pick, build in piece meal fashion). Use the remains of this system to see which players can play the triangle and be our bench for next year. Is that really hard to understand? Sixers have no direction- they tank, draft, then want to trade the players they just drafted, so they can tank more and draft. That ain't direction.

and higher a mediocre player as a mediocre coach


So "tanking and drafting" counts as a direction for us but not for Philly? Regarding "trading drafted players," I don't think any team does that more than us.

Not to mention that Plan A was a complete, unmitigated disaster. Phil's tinkering that was supposed to make this a playoff team turned a 37-win team into a team on pace to win 10 games.


Yeah, "Plan B" isn't really a plan. It's the league's safety net for teams that completely screw up

and plan C will be to fire their coach.

How long do you think Fisher lasts?

I think we're still really terrible next season and Fisher's gone by the Summer of 2016.

Now the joy of my world is in Zion How beautiful if nothing more Than to wait at Zion's door I've never been in love like this before Now let me pray to keep you from The perils that will surely come
A Very Good Read From Bergen Record on Phil & Fish

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy