mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:Melo ... 45 minutes

legs were def gone

Yeah. I thought his limp was more pronounced by the end of the game.

not looking good that we are locked for 5 years

and I really did not like the way he finished

6 points on 8 shots, 0 ft's and 0 assists.

BRIGGS wrote:Okafor=Demarcus Cousins without the charachter issues.

really?

thats a bold statement

TPercy wrote:How did Daly do overall for those that watched a lot..11 points and 4 blks that aint bad

I thought he looked good. Cousins is a bulky and he played him tough.

nixluva wrote:

mreinman wrote:

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Okafor=Demarcus Cousins without the charachter issues.

really?

thats a bold statement

and cousins is a dominating rebounder

Cousins is so talented but I just can't stand his demeanor and hot headedness. If we can land Okafor I'd be pretty happy.

I would be happy too.

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

did I mention option? I am not a GM and don't claim to be one.

Larkin did not play both sides of the ball? Did you watch the game on the radio?

CrushAlot wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.

don't bother ...

its like talking to a wall

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

F500ONE wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.

Of course he's being slobbed over

But

Collison had

29/10/1/2 only missed 1 shot

McCallum 10/4/2 shot high%

Staukus 11/2/1/1 shot high%

Larkin had second half impact more mid 3rd mid 4th qrt impact

He wasn't good in the first half

In my opinion Larkin looked like he was trying to not make mistakes when he was on the court earlier in tge year. He seems like he is comfortable, taking risks and being opportunistic now. He played very well tonight

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

another phil stinker decision

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil