TeamBall wrote:Stupid documentary and really exposes the whole "my heart never wavered" thing with Melo. Definitely won't be watching this. That being said, we all knew the man wanted his money and this thread has "agenda" written all over it.
Why do you say on the hand it exposes Melo's values, yet on the other hand you discount the thread as agenda driven?
This notion that threads that discuss a player's values as much as their BB strengths and weaknesses are agenda-driven and other threads are not agenda-driven doesn't compute.
Since when is having a bias prior to starting a thread a disqualification of the thread's value?
Just asking since your post was of two minds, so I found it odd.
Not referring to you, but I think anytime somebody bleats "Agenda" it is just as lame a debating mechanism as saying "Hater" or other labels meant to squash dissent against prevailing opinions. Now that the consensus has shifted due to the continued implosion of the club, that may change somewhat, but I don't understand why people think they come off as anything other then thick-headed when they say such things.
We all have predispositions when we start or post in a thread and should take that for granted without needing to reach for weak labels.
Per this thread, if Melo comes off looking one way or another due to the documentary, then discussing that is relevant, not comments on why a thread was started. If the thread had zero value, you could say so, but considering this is current events it is commenting on it has every right to exist as any other thread on the board.
(Again, just general thoughts, not being overly personal here).