CrushAlot wrote:

WP76 wrote:When was the last time you saw a game with 35 minutes of garbage time?

This was a surprise. Two good performances prior to this one despite them both being loses.

Not for me. OKC normally runs us out of the building and tonight was no exception. I live in Oklahoma and couldn't get the game on MSG bur rather the Fox OK network. The Thunder announcers were trying to be classy about the Knicks in spite of the obvious dumpster fire we saw from NY on the court.

Splat wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:I will shocked if we win 30 games

We won't

U might be right

CrushAlot wrote:

VCoug wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:Some organizations are so lucky......

Good planning creates its own luck. They stockpile draft picks, scout well, and make overall smart decisions. We don't.

They drafted very well. Durant, Westbrook and Ibaka, and Harden in consecutive years.

As did the Warriors, the draft can be a beautiful thing

Knicks1969 wrote:I will be shocked if we win 30 games

Anything more than 20 wins is unacceptable- I'll be fuming if we have a pointless resurgence late in the season like last year. I'm fed up for settling for the number 7 or 8 pick, like in bad seasons past- we need the number 1.

Splat wrote:

knickscity wrote:with or without melo, this team is way worse than i thought they would be.

I think everyone feels that way regardless of their other opinions. I was pretty sure they wouldn't qualify for the playoffs, but I didn't realize they'd be total crap. When key pieces of your team are named JR, Stat or Bargs, eventually the team rots from the inside out.

The fish rots from the head down

What I find shameful, this team

Can't even manage to meet the lofty expectations

Of the group labeled HATERS

I said 34 wins looks like I'll be proven wrong

For the worst but actually may prove to be for the better

If you catch my drift