To me almost every guy is available other than Melo. I can see clubs having interest in Dalembart Prigs possibly Calderon Jr Smith maybe Jason Smith Shumpert. Dump all of our 1 yr contracts for the best deals we can--then go to the young players Hardaway Larkin Wear and guys we pick up. Let these guys develop over the 2nd half with extended minutes--and hope they can all be a part of the plan going 4 ward

BRIGGS wrote:Love games like this--shows we have talent and guys who can help other teams'.

To me almost every guy is available other than Melo. I can see clubs having interest in Dalembart Prigs possibly Calderon Jr Smith maybe Jason Smith Shumpert. Dump all of our 1 yr contracts for the best deals we can--then go to the young players Hardaway Larkin Wear and guys we pick up. Let these guys develop over the 2nd half with extended minutes--and hope they can all be a part of the plan going 4 ward

You might've been right about flipping JR for Derrick Williams. Throw in some cash and the Kings might budge.

And in the past, I've been steadfast AGAINST keeping Calderon. I felt that he was good enough to play us out of a top tier lottery pick but not good enough to make us into a worthwhile team. After tonight though, he kind of nestled himself into my sports heart. He might be a great mentor to Reggie Jackson (who I agree that we should sign). But how can we inactive/limit Calderon for the season? And would doing so be worth the opportunity cost ($7 million more in cap space, the next 3 years)?

TeamBall wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:...I get the feeling that Fisher is showcasing JR and Shumpert and something has to give, lol.

JR especially. You can only hope it ends up like we're all hoping.

Yeah but JR is screwing up that plan with boneheaded play. Like I alluded to in the game thread, he does the exact opposite of what you need him to do. So if you want to win, he'll help you lose but if you want to lose, he'll help you win. To say that he's an enigma would be an understatement. I can't wait until he's some other team's problem.

gunsnewing wrote:If we are showcasing JR after the performance tonight we are screwed

If the sixers are serious about tanking, Jr would be perfect for them

Leaving teams in a state of turn off

We have to find a way to get teams Turnt Up

On J.R. and the best way to do that is to not play him

NardDogNation wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Love games like this--shows we have talent and guys who can help other teams'.

To me almost every guy is available other than Melo. I can see clubs having interest in Dalembart Prigs possibly Calderon Jr Smith maybe Jason Smith Shumpert. Dump all of our 1 yr contracts for the best deals we can--then go to the young players Hardaway Larkin Wear and guys we pick up. Let these guys develop over the 2nd half with extended minutes--and hope they can all be a part of the plan going 4 ward

You might've been right about flipping JR for Derrick Williams. Throw in some cash and the Kings might budge.

And in the past, I've been steadfast AGAINST keeping Calderon. I felt that he was good enough to play us out of a top tier lottery pick but not good enough to make us into a worthwhile team. After tonight though, he kind of nestled himself into my sports heart. He might be a great mentor to Reggie Jackson (who I agree that we should sign). But how can we inactive/limit Calderon for the season? And would doing so be worth the opportunity cost ($7 million more in cap space, the next 3 years)?

Calderon's contract only runs 2 years after this one. Not sure if you meant 3 years after this one but if so I just wanted to put this here cause after next season yes an expiring and can probably be traded easily if need be.

BRIGGS wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:If we are showcasing JR after the performance tonight we are screwed

If the sixers are serious about tanking, Jr would be perfect for them

The Sixers are 0-15 right now I think they have

The Blueprint To Tanking

What the sixers are doing is fraud.

The NBA promotes this so I don't think it is fraud at all.

He had 13 & 13 meanwhile TYSON had 17 & 25

gunsnewing wrote:No way Briggs. Has he ever had 5-6 games like that in his entire career?

He had 13 & 13 meanwhile TYSON had 17 & 25

Yeah did we forget what Tyson did

How come fans aren't outraged

Tyson pretty much Hibbert Dalembert