You mean to tell Ny could not have
Pursued $ a pg like S.Telfair, D.Collision
Or 2way pg Shaun Livingston in 1 yr
Deals? Without hurting 2015/2016 cap.

You also have our overrated Nyk heroes in
Losing to very bad nba teams all the
Time now.

Don't wanna here about Milwaukee Bucks
Being upcoming good team.

Bucks, Magic, and pending 76ers all
Bad nba teams. Ny need to get the point/pg
And stop losing to putrid nba asbins or
The Knicks will be on their way to 45+ losses
During season.

1 - Never overestimate the makings of the home team

2 - Never underestimate the makings of the competition

The East is better, this was clearly evident first day of season

nixluva wrote:What is the point of this TROLL-fest? Just cuz they've lost some early games doesn't mean this team is on it's way to losing 45 games. It's not the pace of winning losing in a given stretch of games it's how they play overall that matters. They could just as well go on a winning streak or simply play better ball and reach a higher 5 of basketball the rest of the way. None of this current losing is an indicator of what they will do the rest of the season. That's like assuming when they had that hot start in the 54 win season that they'd maintain that level of play for the entire season.

People need to be careful making huge overarching assumptions based on how things have gone early this season. Yeah it's been bad but you can also see that there is potential for them to right the ship and play better as many of these games were very winnable. My guess is that Phil isn't going to make a panic move just to have a better record this year. We all know that this season isn't really about the final record. It would be nice if the Knicks were fully healthy and came out stronger but it's not the end of the world as long as they can get it right over the next few weeks. 12 games doesn't make a season.

Reread that before you call people delusional.

To NOT lose 45 games means going at least 38-44 for the season.

They are 3-9.

That means they'd have to go 35-35 the remaining games.

If you want to tell us this team will play .500 ball from this game forward, then you may be the one who is tripping.

Splat wrote:

nixluva wrote:What is the point of this TROLL-fest? Just cuz they've lost some early games doesn't mean this team is on it's way to losing 45 games. It's not the pace of winning losing in a given stretch of games it's how they play overall that matters. They could just as well go on a winning streak or simply play better ball and reach a higher 5 of basketball the rest of the way. None of this current losing is an indicator of what they will do the rest of the season. That's like assuming when they had that hot start in the 54 win season that they'd maintain that level of play for the entire season.

People need to be careful making huge overarching assumptions based on how things have gone early this season. Yeah it's been bad but you can also see that there is potential for them to right the ship and play better as many of these games were very winnable. My guess is that Phil isn't going to make a panic move just to have a better record this year. We all know that this season isn't really about the final record. It would be nice if the Knicks were fully healthy and came out stronger but it's not the end of the world as long as they can get it right over the next few weeks. 12 games doesn't make a season.

Reread that before you call people delusional.

To NOT lose 45 games means going at least 38-44 for the season.

They are 3-9.

That means they'd have to go 35-35 the remaining games.

If you want to tell us this team will play .500 ball from this game forward, then you may be the one who is tripping.

Keep throwing up negativity but you can't predict how a team is gonna play based on a small sample size like 12 games. It's entirely possible for this team to play at a much better clip than this. You aren't Nostradamus and you can't guarantee that this team won't play much better the rest of the way. Maybe they play above .500 the rest of the way. We don't know. It's not a lock that they will keep losing games at this rate.

Splat wrote:It would be really hard to keep losing games at this rate. That's why I still have them winning about 28-30 games instead of the 19-21 rate they're currently on. Those fun streaks happen even to the worst teams, so I expect we'll have a 4 game streak and we'll all have fun and enjoy it. But streaks don't mean much if the result is a non-competitive product. This is not a team capable of competing for anything so go ahead and point fingers at people and go rah rah rah all day long if it makes you happy.

That is what worries me is those half azz tank jobs. Usually leaves the Knicks in the wrong position to pick up great talent.

Splat wrote:It would be really hard to keep losing games at this rate. That's why I still have them winning about 28-30 games instead of the 19-21 rate they're currently on. Those fun streaks happen even to the worst teams, so I expect we'll have a 4 game streak and we'll all have fun and enjoy it. But streaks don't mean much if the result is a non-competitive product. This is not a team capable of competing for anything so go ahead and point fingers at people and go rah rah rah all day long if it makes you happy.

No one borrows time against the season better than Nix

You have some teams .500 or better and they haven't played

Their best ball either, look no further than the 6-5 Bucks

Oh wait they got new ownerhship, a new coach, a new culture

Just like we did, I guess tha's what Kidd and Ersan are there for

To get the Bucks to 48-50wins or thereabouts

We haven't even got into the heart of playing our division

Nor the stately teams out West

Here's what the Bucks got that we didn't in the offseason

They got a great young kidd in Jabari Parker, who's game

May mimic Melo's but he has the steadiness and poise of a Paul Pierce

We didn't get that this offseason, but we're currently

Headed that direction next offseason, hopefully the players

Continue their remarkable dedication to fulfill Phil and Fish's plan

Big Bucks No Whammies in the Lotto

look we're all fans I love it here
and our Knicks

But they been as bad as Mike Woodson's worst times last year and Woodson got axed' from Knicks
with at least a respectable > .500 winning record with MELO and bunch of guys, which is what we got now.

There is no negativity I am just good at telling the truth,
The team is going no where faster than Dec. 31 2014.

At Knicks pace they will be off TNT and ESPN games prior to NewYear 2015 cause of poor ratings/ boring.

Knicks at least need to give fans something to cheer on
So far
so BAD.

Knicksfan wrote:Better they lose. I already made up my mind I dont care if they lose. Learn the triangle and get a lottery pick.

LOL
Good one !

DJMUSIC wrote:Good points

look we're all fans I love it here
and our Knicks

But they been as bad as Mike Woodson's worst times last year and Woodson got axed' from Knicks
with at least a respectable > .500 winning record with MELO and bunch of guys, which is what we got now.

There is no negativity I am just good at telling the truth,
The team is going no where faster than Dec. 31 2014.

At Knicks pace they will be off TNT and ESPN games prior to NewYear 2015 cause of poor ratings/ boring.

Knicks at least need to give fans something to cheer on
So far
so BAD.

nixluva wrote:

Splat wrote:

nixluva wrote:What is the point of this TROLL-fest? Just cuz they've lost some early games doesn't mean this team is on it's way to losing 45 games. It's not the pace of winning losing in a given stretch of games it's how they play overall that matters. They could just as well go on a winning streak or simply play better ball and reach a higher 5 of basketball the rest of the way. None of this current losing is an indicator of what they will do the rest of the season. That's like assuming when they had that hot start in the 54 win season that they'd maintain that level of play for the entire season.

People need to be careful making huge overarching assumptions based on how things have gone early this season. Yeah it's been bad but you can also see that there is potential for them to right the ship and play better as many of these games were very winnable. My guess is that Phil isn't going to make a panic move just to have a better record this year. We all know that this season isn't really about the final record. It would be nice if the Knicks were fully healthy and came out stronger but it's not the end of the world as long as they can get it right over the next few weeks. 12 games doesn't make a season.

Reread that before you call people delusional.

To NOT lose 45 games means going at least 38-44 for the season.

They are 3-9.

That means they'd have to go 35-35 the remaining games.

If you want to tell us this team will play .500 ball from this game forward, then you may be the one who is tripping.

Keep throwing up negativity but you can't predict how a team is gonna play based on a small sample size like 12 games. It's entirely possible for this team to play at a much better clip than this. You aren't Nostradamus and you can't guarantee that this team won't play much better the rest of the way. Maybe they play above .500 the rest of the way. We don't know. It's not a lock that they will keep losing games at this rate.

after last night's debacle you need to look squarely at the main issue which is the horrid defense that the knicks were destined to play this season. there is no cure for that, not even a top 5 offense-- so unless fisher puts the hammer down and gets these guys to start pressing and trapping the knicks are going to continue sucking-- of course conditioning will remain an issue in that scenario but he's already playing 12 guys so there's no harm in it.