Since no one has the gal to step up to WaterMELON, the media needs to shine the light on the coaching staff's ineptitude in that department.

Further, why is our ofensive rebounding so poor? As soon as a shot is released, at least two Knicks (preferably a guard and a center) should be designated to crash the board.

mreinman wrote:nice .... start a bash melo thread when he actually played a good game on both ends.

You called that a good game? Do you actually know how many points he gave to Milsap?

We lost this game at the C and PG positions. Look at the differential. Melo played well

BRIGGS wrote:These threads are obnoxious.

We lost this game at the C and PG positions. Look at the differential. Melo played well

PG play was decent,but the same can't be said for the Center spot.

Knicks1969 wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:These threads are obnoxious.

We lost this game at the C and PG positions. Look at the differential. Melo played well

PG play was decent,but the same can't be said for the Center spot.

pg play was decent? Really? Barry Lakins kidd or barry's daddy prigs? Which one was good?

GustavBahler wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:Hope the mods see this bigoted crap.

I am one of Melo's biggest fans, I just find his desire to be great putrid. He is way too cool if you ask me; even Clyde referenced his lack of aggression during the game.

Then lose the "waterMELOn" tag. Poor choice of words. other ways to get your point across.

Since when is watermelon considered to be an Offensive word?

Knicks1969 wrote:

mreinman wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:These threads are obnoxious.

We lost this game at the C and PG positions. Look at the differential. Melo played well

PG play was decent,but the same can't be said for the Center spot.

pg play was decent? Really? Barry Lakins kidd or barry's daddy prigs? Which one was good?

I thought Larkin did ok, he did not turn the ball over and was able to come up with a couple if steals. He did not do a good job guarding Shroeder, but Shroeder mostly got his points in The paint against our bigs.

Larkin was better than prigs (who I like but was awful) but he was not good.

We have horrible guards and zero guard penetration

gunsnewing wrote:

Nalod wrote:Media crucifix not needed. The games speak for themselves.

I'd rather them lose running the triangle than abandon it.

This will develop into something meaningful.

problem is they are losing NOT running the triangle

This is true.The triangle is not being consistenly run. Most of the players on the team run around like headless chickens. Melo did not always do the right thing in terms if the set offense, but I was a few rows behind the basket and saw him trying to direct traffic a lot, which most people on here asked for today. Either it wasn't on TV on people are choosing to neglect it. In addition, many times when Melo had the ball in the post the rest of the team abandoned the triangle and hung him out to dry. Phil said he'll dispose of people not buying in. Melo's stats and actions in the game said otherwise. This thread is pointless.

mreinman wrote:nice .... start a bash melo thread when he actually played a good game on both ends.

He played a very good game 7 assists and 9 rebounds. Only thing I would say is he took 7 or 8 shots to many. If he drove to the hoop he might of gotten to the line more which would have reduced his shots taken.

Side note 5 shots for their best interior player.