[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Like to see if we could get Nate Wolters for a couple of 2's
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2014  11:46 AM
and move Prigs to someone else. Bucks have 4 PG's--I like the potential of Wolters at 6-5 from that position
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
11/9/2014  2:42 PM
I agree. I always liked him.
Nalod
Posts: 71363
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/9/2014  3:33 PM
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
11/9/2014  4:07 PM
BRIGGS wrote:and move Prigs to someone else. Bucks have 4 PG's--I like the potential of Wolters at 6-5 from that position

I think it's more likely that they move Mayo before they move any of their other lead guards.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
NumberTwoPencil
Posts: 20936
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2003
Member: #481
USA
11/9/2014  4:49 PM
Deal. However, with Calderon coming back . . . I doubt it will happen.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2014  4:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/9/2014  5:25 PM
NumberTwoPencil wrote:Deal. However, with Calderon coming back . . . I doubt it will happen.

I would be looking at him as our number 2 PG who can play with Jose if needed but also learn from him. He put up good enough numbers and his play was too good to sit on a bench. At 6-5 with his style of play and already proven game--there is 0 downside.


RIP Crushalot😞
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  6:06 PM
haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.
so here is what phil is thinking ....
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2014  6:11 PM
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
11/9/2014  6:12 PM
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.
He played well against the Knicks last year. I think he was their starter for awhile because of injuries last year. He held his own.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  6:19 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2014  6:23 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.
He played well against the Knicks last year. I think he was their starter for awhile because of injuries last year. He held his own.

The way to help build our team is to identify guys who are not being used by their teams--but should be. Right now Im sure Nate's agent and Nate are not happy that he went from nearly making the all rookie team playing very well in the SL to bench warmer. This helps facilitate trades. Not every deal needs to be a 9 player deal or go for broke. Piece meal trades--heck offer them a 2 plus 1 mm in cash. We need to see if we can pull a couple of these types of trades off. If they blow up--no biggie--if you hit you just bought very low--so youre a big winner. I dont really care about Melo--he'll be ok. But our PG position needs rebuilding.

RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2014  6:30 PM
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

If you have not seen Nate Wolters play--then why even bother responding on this thread?

RIP Crushalot😞
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/9/2014  6:30 PM
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  6:32 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

If you have not seen Nate Wolters play--then why even bother responding on this thread?

Don't get defensive. I stated clearly that I have not seen him play.

You have ... though his stats are awful. Is he just mr. intangible?

I am asking why his stats are so awful. The eye test does not completely trump stats.

Ever think that maybe this is why he has not earned PT?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  6:34 PM
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/9/2014  6:42 PM
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.


The minutes dont matter though, you're posting stats when he has limited attempts to base them on.

By your logic Steve Nash should have quit the NBA after his third year since .471TS% just aint gonna cut it.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  6:52 PM
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.


The minutes dont matter though, you're posting stats when he has limited attempts to base them on.

By your logic Steve Nash should have quit the NBA after his third year since .471TS% just aint gonna cut it.

Nice analogy.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/9/2014  7:04 PM
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.


The minutes dont matter though, you're posting stats when he has limited attempts to base them on.

By your logic Steve Nash should have quit the NBA after his third year since .471TS% just aint gonna cut it.

Nice analogy.


yet your beating down a rookie?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
11/9/2014  7:08 PM
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.


The minutes dont matter though, you're posting stats when he has limited attempts to base them on.

By your logic Steve Nash should have quit the NBA after his third year since .471TS% just aint gonna cut it.

Nice analogy.


yet your beating down a rookie?

I did not beat down a rookie.

I want to know what is seen that is so impressive (eye test) to overcome bad stats.

Is his defense great? Is he a great passer? Glue guy?

Do you feel empowered when you reply to post like an azzhole?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
11/9/2014  7:14 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/9/2014  7:14 PM
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
knickscity wrote:
mreinman wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
mreinman wrote:haven't seen him play but the advanced stats on him are really ugly.

They guy had a 3.2-1 TO ratio last year--his first year and shot 44% as a 6-5 PG with really good skills. You need to be able to see the talent and it's pretty easy with him. Phil likes big smart PG's and he would immediately be a guy who could help us and at the same time be a piece for the long term future.

5 assist per 36 minutes is not too good.

48.6 TS is terrible and even worse than Felton.

He is a bad FT shooter and a terrible 3 point shooter.

Again, I have not seen him, all I have is his stats to go on.

How is his defense?

He did well in college, in all the areas you're referring to...so the talent is certainly there. As an NBA rookie he didnt shoot nearly enough to gauge statistically. Imo i see a Tony Wroten situation developing with him and would love to acquire him for a 2nd rounder.

He played 1300 minutes last year. That is significant minutes for a rookie.


The minutes dont matter though, you're posting stats when he has limited attempts to base them on.

By your logic Steve Nash should have quit the NBA after his third year since .471TS% just aint gonna cut it.

Nice analogy.


yet your beating down a rookie?

I did not beat down a rookie.

I want to know what is seen that is so impressive (eye test) to overcome bad stats.

Is his defense great? Is he a great passer? Glue guy?

Do you feel empowered when you reply to post like an azzhole?


Not really, but do you feel empowered to use stats while admitting you aint seen him at all? Did you at least watch the kid in college...he was very good there, everyone dont translate to the NBA immediately, thats why I used the Nash example.

It was based to help you understand such things, but it really doesnt matter, this is the second time of recent note you're using stats and havent watched the subject your bashing.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Like to see if we could get Nate Wolters for a couple of 2's
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy