[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks leaning towards not picking up Larkin's 15-16 option
Author Thread
blkexec
Posts: 27851
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
10/26/2014  8:46 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/26/2014  8:47 AM
CrushAlot wrote:Larkin, Shane 5' 10.25'' 5' 11.5'' 170.8 5' 10.75'' 7' 5.5'' 3.8 7.5 8.75. Nash is reported actual height is 6'1. That is still three inches taller than Shane.

This is true...Larkin and Nash are not the same height. The problem with Larkin compared to other 6ft and under guards....is his arm length...which is very short and doesnt make up for his height. This is why Iverson was so good. Look at Rondo. These guys have longer arms and can play in traffic. Tony Parker is nice but hes 6'3 i believe. Speed...jumper....passing....breaking down the defense and Basketball IQ must be a high skill set or hes easily replaceable by the plethora of 6ft guards thats available like me.....lol.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
AUTOADVERT
Knicks leaning towards not picking up Larkin's 15-16 option

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy