Author | Thread |
Splat
Posts: 23774 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2014 Member: #5862 |
10/16/2014 12:03 AM
Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true.
Dalembert http://nypost.com/2014/10/15/gritty-acy-has-good-chance-to-be-knicks-starting-power-forward The article cites many of the basic reasons speculated on here by myself and others. Acy's a classic workhorse PF fit next to Melo. Acy knows his role and fills it. Acy + Shump = high energy tone for 1st unit D. With Dalembert and more D from Melo, its a competent defensive starting 5 that is enough to compensate for Calderon's inability to contain penetrators. Bargs is muffing it so Acy has stepped in. I think that is good luck for the team to not to have to start Bargs. Fish is definitely using this as a way to excuse himself from starting Bargs. You can see the political usage of the media already being deployed. They made some puffy comments earlier about how great the expiring vets will be, but they always have their out clauses as the coach. I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
|
AUTOADVERT |
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
10/16/2014 12:17 AM
Not surprised. Very happy about this
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
10/16/2014 2:21 AM
Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. What this does puts poor balance in the roster. Essentially you have three highly inconsistent players on offense to start the game which gives the opponent leeway to key on Melo. I will defintely take my chances with Acy Shumpert and Dalembart shooting the ball. And the next unit--we took the defensive players and put them all in unit 1--so you would have Smith Bargs JR and Hardaway and they all are shooters. Maybe it goes well a few games? but give it time and they will key hard on Melo if that is the starting unit. RIP Crushalot😞
|
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
10/16/2014 9:27 AM
BRIGGS wrote:this... they have a gravity metric now in the NBA. It measures how much attention a players gets away from the ball. Its a pretty cool stat because it spells out which player opposing teams target the most. The two guys in the NBA who had the highest score were Melo and Paul George (I honestly forget who was 1 and 2). Last year we saw Melo chased constantly and worn down by the end of games. Now are going to surround him Acy and Dalembert... two guys who are total non entities on offense, and Acy is totally unproven as far as even being a rotation player in the league. Shump is a wildcard but we have seen when he's asked to do too much he's wildy inconsistant at best. Last year Shump had 37 games where he scored five points or less. He had 7 games he didnt score at all.Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. Hard to see that lineup working for any extended period of time. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
10/16/2014 9:55 AM
Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true.the great thing about this article however is it seems that Fisher is focused on the best team, not catering to personalities. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
10/16/2014 10:49 AM
fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:this... they have a gravity metric now in the NBA. It measures how much attention a players gets away from the ball. Its a pretty cool stat because it spells out which player opposing teams target the most. The two guys in the NBA who had the highest score were Melo and Paul George (I honestly forget who was 1 and 2). Last year we saw Melo chased constantly and worn down by the end of games. Now are going to surround him Acy and Dalembert... two guys who are total non entities on offense, and Acy is totally unproven as far as even being a rotation player in the league. Shump is a wildcard but we have seen when he's asked to do too much he's wildy inconsistant at best. Last year Shump had 37 games where he scored five points or less. He had 7 games he didnt score at all.Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. It's a obviously a lineup that will live and die on how Shumpert and Acy shoot the ball. They seem to like what Acy brings to the table on D, and remember, he can also switch with Anthony and play D at the 3 if Melo is having problems. You cannot do this with Smith or Amare. If Acy can actually hit the midrange jumper on a somewhat consistent basis and can give you 7-8 rebounds/game, + give you the toughness, hustle, and D he is known for, he is going to get 25-30 mpg, IMO. On the other hand, Acy might also be a guy who starts, but gets his minutes adjusted if his shooting is off and we want/need more offense. Jason Smith will get his minutes, whether at the 4 or 5. His jumper is solid and he seems like a smart player who finds ways to compensate for his limited athleticism. Have to think that there will be a lot of shuffling in the first part of the season as Fisher experiments. We seem to have some frontline flexibility, since Amare and Smith can both get minutes at the 5 if they want to go with a more offensive minded and defensively challenged lineup. I don't think anyone knows what the starting lineup of the Knicks will be 30 games into the season- just have to hope that everyone plays to their capabilities, and trust that Fisher and Jackson know what they are doing. Big thing right now is that everyone buys into the offensive scheme and shows some f'n pride and tenacity on the defensive end. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
jrodmc
Posts: 32927 Alba Posts: 50 Joined: 11/24/2004 Member: #805 USA |
10/16/2014 10:52 AM
fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:this... they have a gravity metric now in the NBA. It measures how much attention a players gets away from the ball. Its a pretty cool stat because it spells out which player opposing teams target the most. The two guys in the NBA who had the highest score were Melo and Paul George (I honestly forget who was 1 and 2). Last year we saw Melo chased constantly and worn down by the end of games. Now are going to surround him Acy and Dalembert... two guys who are total non entities on offense, and Acy is totally unproven as far as even being a rotation player in the league. Shump is a wildcard but we have seen when he's asked to do too much he's wildy inconsistant at best. Last year Shump had 37 games where he scored five points or less. He had 7 games he didnt score at all.Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. You're comparing the new team to an old iso-metric, right? If opponents this season replicate that melo-centric gravity, that should open up Acy and SamD at point blank around the basket, right? It would also include getting Shump moving and grooving, rather than the oft-mentioned sitting in the corner waiting on Iso sets in order to launch those patented my knees are cold today threes. Add in a PG who can shoot and does not suffer from any shooting bashfulness. Homery butter flavored optimism, I know... |
Knixkik
Posts: 34908 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #11 USA |
10/16/2014 10:54 AM
fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:this... they have a gravity metric now in the NBA. It measures how much attention a players gets away from the ball. Its a pretty cool stat because it spells out which player opposing teams target the most. The two guys in the NBA who had the highest score were Melo and Paul George (I honestly forget who was 1 and 2). Last year we saw Melo chased constantly and worn down by the end of games. Now are going to surround him Acy and Dalembert... two guys who are total non entities on offense, and Acy is totally unproven as far as even being a rotation player in the league. Shump is a wildcard but we have seen when he's asked to do too much he's wildy inconsistant at best. Last year Shump had 37 games where he scored five points or less. He had 7 games he didnt score at all.Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. One thing about this lineup is it has many similarities to the lineup in 2012 that gave us one of the hottest starts of all time. Melo, Felton, Kidd, Chandler, and Brewer just had a chemistry like non other, and maybe with a few more games together this team can build that chemistry. That being said, the lack of scoring and balance could be a concern. |
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
10/16/2014 10:56 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. They will key in on Melo and the rest of those guys will get good shots and hit them Welcome to the Triangle |
fishmike
Posts: 53134 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
10/16/2014 10:59 AM
jrodmc wrote:well you figure the guy who sags on Melo would be a wing, not a big, or at least guarding the big who isnt in the post. If your defending that lineup is this simple: Sag on Melo. Do NOT let Calderon get an open look from deep and force Shump/Sammy/Acy to beat you with midrange jumpers. Force those other guys to beat you.fishmike wrote:BRIGGS wrote:this... they have a gravity metric now in the NBA. It measures how much attention a players gets away from the ball. Its a pretty cool stat because it spells out which player opposing teams target the most. The two guys in the NBA who had the highest score were Melo and Paul George (I honestly forget who was 1 and 2). Last year we saw Melo chased constantly and worn down by the end of games. Now are going to surround him Acy and Dalembert... two guys who are total non entities on offense, and Acy is totally unproven as far as even being a rotation player in the league. Shump is a wildcard but we have seen when he's asked to do too much he's wildy inconsistant at best. Last year Shump had 37 games where he scored five points or less. He had 7 games he didnt score at all.Splat wrote:Sounds like the lineup I predicted is going to be the starting 5 if this is true. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|