[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Amare and JR smith are the odd men out
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  6:35 AM
Everyone in the team is playing well except these two. Jr Smith is too frustrated with the offense. He came out and said it will take until January for the team to get it. I think by the last pre season game the Knicks will have it down. Shump and thjr are thriving in the new style of play. Looks like jr is the one that needs to sit now.

Amare is not a team ball player. He needs the ball and he wants to score. He wants the offense to focus on him. He thinks highly of himself and wants individual success over team success. You can see it in his body language. Bargs played well enough in the first game to get my support. Jason smith to me won the starting 4 spot. Dalembert won the starting center spot. Quincy Acy deserves minutes too. Amare adds nothing to the equation.

this is the culture change. You want guys to buy in. Your stars have to be the first to buy in. Amare and JR are not buying in. I smell a trade.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  6:42 AM
I thought that at first, but late in the game last night amare stepped up and showed his repertoire.

Hitting jumpers, driving to the hoop, blocking shots and sharing the ball.

So, I disagree with your assessment and question where it's coming from.


Looks like JR had back spasms so the jury is still out, but I can't allow you to bash amare with no proof other than your random gut.

Amare is playing extremely well and contributing within the framework of the triangle.

Nice try though.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
10/15/2014  6:48 AM
Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  8:01 AM
babyKnicks wrote:Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Hoes gonna ride the dick too.

What's wrong with not like a players game? I think the guy doesn't fit. Stays don't tell the whole story. Just like +/- serves no purpose.

Amare looks majestic when he scores or when he goes all out on a block.... as far as the team concept he does nothing. Will we win any more games by playing him over any other guy? No. I think we would be better off letting him go for the Better of the team. Chemistry wise and culture wise. I could be wrong but don't label be a hater cuz i don't like a guy. You can be a dick rider. Anyway it takes away from the conversion

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/15/2014  8:15 AM
EnySpree wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Hoes gonna ride the dick too.

What's wrong with not like a players game? I think the guy doesn't fit. Stays don't tell the whole story. Just like +/- serves no purpose.

Amare looks majestic when he scores or when he goes all out on a block.... as far as the team concept he does nothing. Will we win any more games by playing him over any other guy? No. I think we would be better off letting him go for the Better of the team. Chemistry wise and culture wise. I could be wrong but don't label be a hater cuz i don't like a guy. You can be a dick rider. Anyway it takes away from the conversion

come on man disagreeing is fine but using profanity laced insults is not respectful. Anyway in regards to Amare he is what he is we cant move him because of his salary but he can still be effectiive. Jason Smith is what he is too a big guy off the bench who can shoot and provide some interior defense
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/15/2014  8:19 AM
I could go Jason Smith or Acy in the starting unit. Either or -- doesn't matter to me, as long as they're both playing. Bargnani's my odd man out -- I feel he's redundant if we're playing Jason Smith 25 minutes a night. Plus, his strained hammy just makes the decision all the more easier...Simple as that. It's not gonna happen, but it's what I'd do. I'm sure Bargs is gonna play in some capacity (at whose expense though?)...Up to me, Smith and Acy are my 2 bigs off the bench.

Also, Amar'e Stoudemire absolutely, positively sees court time. In fact, I'd start him. No way I'm sitting our 2nd best player... He may not be the 2nd best player next year (if he returns, which he very well could depending on how he looks this year & what type of off-season we have) but right now this second, on this team, he's hands down our 2nd best player. I think it's imperative that the man is brought up to speed as soon as possible. We need to get him working on all cylinders...Last night, I thought he looked good (it didn't count--a whistle had just blown--but how 'bout the lightning quick baseline blow-by for a dunk he had on Nerlens Noel in the 2nd half -- if you blinked or looked away for a sec., you would've missed it. That move was damn impressive and pretty telling on where he is and what he could potentially do for us). As I've seen every game so far, his offensive movements have be real good (he's making his moves with force, a renewed quickness we haven't seen the last 2 seasons & conviction), a couple of more shots fell last night as a result, and he was a factor on the glass... Only adjustment I really wanna see--I think working with Jose Calderon over Shane Larkin, strangely something we haven't seen yet, could help Amar'e get up to speed ever quicker. I think Calderon could bring out the best in Amar'e...You wanna tell me the best thing to do is trade the guy off -- OK, fine. Go get me a trade worth making. Until I see a worthwhile proposal, he's my 2nd best player that I feel we need to feature heavily in our attack. And the better he plays, the better trade package we could get for him by the deadline. No need to move him now. A trade like Jason Richardson and a 2nd rounder will be there at the deadline no matter how STAT plays, unless Philly falls back out of the race. It's minimal value. However, if he plays well, I think we could see some better offers (not that we have to take them--playing this thing out & simply letting his monster salary expire off the cap still feels like the way to go). In the meantime, if we want to win and have a good year this season, I think he could help us. He gives us a post presence unlike any other big on the roster...Bargnani's the guy that I feel maintains minimum value throughout. Pound for pound, I'd argue Jason Smith's the better player anyway. STAT's a different animal entirely. It's imperative that we get him going in the right direction. Just how I see it all as of right now.

knickknack
Posts: 20054
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/17/2014
Member: #5891

10/15/2014  8:30 AM
jr is gonna have a tough time beating out shump and THJ because they're both hungry and way more efficient then him right now. Stat on the other hand will be in the rotation and probably receive a good share of the big man minutes to go around because although he hasn't been the clear front runner no one has in the front court so then you go by what you know a guy can do when healthy and stat has the best resume in the bunch.
trust the kristaps-cess!
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/15/2014  8:39 AM
I would be shocked if they really are the odd men out. Whether people like it or not (when healthy) they are still our 2nd and 3rd best players. Considering we arent scoring much keeping Amare and his 55% shooting on the bench doesnt make much sense. Same with JR who when playing well is an impact player.

Guys like Acy get a lot of burn in the preseason because coach wants to see what he has against NBA talent (76rs and Celtics barely qualify but we wont go there).

Fisher can play who he wants, but how do you think this thing is going to go down if the Knicks start 3-10 with Amare and JR not playing or involved and we are scoring 80 points a game? Makes zero sense. Fisher needs to get what he can get from these guys. If its only to ship them out later fine. I can tell you if they are malcontents on the bench not getting time while we are losing games and Quincy Acy is playing 20 mpg they will have zero value and this thing will get ugly fast.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/15/2014  8:44 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/15/2014  8:45 AM
fishmike wrote:I would be shocked if they really are the odd men out. Whether people like it or not (when healthy) they are still our 2nd and 3rd best players. Considering we arent scoring much keeping Amare and his 55% shooting on the bench doesnt make much sense. Same with JR who when playing well is an impact player.

Guys like Acy get a lot of burn in the preseason because coach wants to see what he has against NBA talent (76rs and Celtics barely qualify but we wont go there).

Fisher can play who he wants, but how do you think this thing is going to go down if the Knicks start 3-10 with Amare and JR not playing or involved and we are scoring 80 points a game? Makes zero sense. Fisher needs to get what he can get from these guys. If its only to ship them out later fine. I can tell you if they are malcontents on the bench not getting time while we are losing games and Quincy Acy is playing 20 mpg they will have zero value and this thing will get ugly fast.

Excellent points. I mean the same people saying we're not scoring enough points are the same ones who want Amar'e to sit. Does that make any sense??

fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/15/2014  9:15 AM
Finestrg wrote:
fishmike wrote:I would be shocked if they really are the odd men out. Whether people like it or not (when healthy) they are still our 2nd and 3rd best players. Considering we arent scoring much keeping Amare and his 55% shooting on the bench doesnt make much sense. Same with JR who when playing well is an impact player.

Guys like Acy get a lot of burn in the preseason because coach wants to see what he has against NBA talent (76rs and Celtics barely qualify but we wont go there).

Fisher can play who he wants, but how do you think this thing is going to go down if the Knicks start 3-10 with Amare and JR not playing or involved and we are scoring 80 points a game? Makes zero sense. Fisher needs to get what he can get from these guys. If its only to ship them out later fine. I can tell you if they are malcontents on the bench not getting time while we are losing games and Quincy Acy is playing 20 mpg they will have zero value and this thing will get ugly fast.

Excellent points. I mean the same people saying we're not scoring enough points are the same ones who want Amar'e to sit. Does that make any sense??

some guys hate Amare, and he's not part of the future. I get it. If the Knicks are going to effectively rebuild this roster they must get value where there is value. Take the emotion out of it. Knicks finished 16-5 and Amare put up 15/6 and shot 55% in 28 minutes during that stretch. If you dont think that type of production is valuable in the NBA your just not thinking with your head.

Lets face it... there are still big changes coming, and some of those changes mean we have to hang onto the past a little longer. We still need something from Amare and JR, even if its simply a little effort before they are shown the door. To say we dont need them is pure denial. These guys arent robots.

When the season starts you will see plenty of Amare and JR. Deal with it and hope they play well.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  10:59 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Hoes gonna ride the dick too.

What's wrong with not like a players game? I think the guy doesn't fit. Stays don't tell the whole story. Just like +/- serves no purpose.

Amare looks majestic when he scores or when he goes all out on a block.... as far as the team concept he does nothing. Will we win any more games by playing him over any other guy? No. I think we would be better off letting him go for the Better of the team. Chemistry wise and culture wise. I could be wrong but don't label be a hater cuz i don't like a guy. You can be a dick rider. Anyway it takes away from the conversion

come on man disagreeing is fine but using profanity laced insults is not respectful. Anyway in regards to Amare he is what he is we cant move him because of his salary but he can still be effectiive. Jason Smith is what he is too a big guy off the bench who can shoot and provide some interior defense

I apologize but in the context of being called a hater, I take it as some one disregarding my opinion because of envy. To me that's worse than using a curse word. I don't hate or envy another person. We're talking basketball. I already explained that I don't like Amare and I believe he keeps proving why. My opinion can change just like it had with shump so far in pre season.

Anyway I do apologize but you see where it came from.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
10/15/2014  11:06 AM
Amare is a mainstay if your planning on going far. He is going to help fg percentage for the team. The last thing anyone wants is a 42% shooting team. Amare and Dalembert might be the only players on the team to shoot over 50%. The rest are not going to come close to 50% shooting. You need consistent interior scoring and Amare provides that.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/15/2014  11:34 AM
Both Amare and JR are highly talented scorers. This team still needs guys who can get it done even against good D. IMO we need to still put this in context. It's SUPER early in this process of changing LONG held ways of playing the game. This is a complete reboot of how these players play and now think the game. Not everyone will pick it up right away. I have confidence in Fish and the staff to keep teaching and eventually get thru to everyone. Now that doesn't mean every player will excel playing this way but they can all get better than they are right now.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

10/15/2014  11:54 AM
EnySpree wrote:Everyone in the team is playing well except these two. Jr Smith is too frustrated with the offense. He came out and said it will take until January for the team to get it. I think by the last pre season game the Knicks will have it down. Shump and thjr are thriving in the new style of play. Looks like jr is the one that needs to sit now.

Amare is not a team ball player. He needs the ball and he wants to score. He wants the offense to focus on him. He thinks highly of himself and wants individual success over team success. You can see it in his body language. Bargs played well enough in the first game to get my support. Jason smith to me won the starting 4 spot. Dalembert won the starting center spot. Quincy Acy deserves minutes too. Amare adds nothing to the equation.

this is the culture change. You want guys to buy in. Your stars have to be the first to buy in. Amare and JR are not buying in. I smell a trade.

You can add Bargnani to that list. He looked good in the first game but I still prefer Jason Smith, Quincy Acy, Samuel Dalembert, Cole Aldrich and Travis Wear to him and Amare. Worse comes to worse, we could always add Kenyon Martin for insurance purposes.

NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

10/15/2014  11:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/15/2014  12:01 PM
EnySpree wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Hoes gonna ride the dick too.

What's wrong with not like a players game? I think the guy doesn't fit. Stays don't tell the whole story. Just like +/- serves no purpose.

Amare looks majestic when he scores or when he goes all out on a block.... as far as the team concept he does nothing. Will we win any more games by playing him over any other guy? No. I think we would be better off letting him go for the Better of the team. Chemistry wise and culture wise. I could be wrong but don't label be a hater cuz i don't like a guy. You can be a dick rider. Anyway it takes away from the conversion

come on man disagreeing is fine but using profanity laced insults is not respectful. Anyway in regards to Amare he is what he is we cant move him because of his salary but he can still be effectiive. Jason Smith is what he is too a big guy off the bench who can shoot and provide some interior defense

I apologize but in the context of being called a hater, I take it as some one disregarding my opinion because of envy. To me that's worse than using a curse word. I don't hate or envy another person. We're talking basketball. I already explained that I don't like Amare and I believe he keeps proving why. My opinion can change just like it had with shump so far in pre season.

Anyway I do apologize but you see where it came from.

I'm not sure "dick riding" constitutes profanity. Some people are just overly sensitive. I don't think you need to apologize.

P.S., I think you've been on point with Amar'e. I like Amar'e the person plenty but Amar'e the player is detrimental to this team.

EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  12:09 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
babyKnicks wrote:Last night...

Amare: 4/10, 5 boards, 1 block, 1 turnover
Jason smith: 5/10, 5 boards, 0 blocks, 3 turnovers

Looks pretty even to me, but hey, haters are gonna hate.

Hoes gonna ride the dick too.

What's wrong with not like a players game? I think the guy doesn't fit. Stays don't tell the whole story. Just like +/- serves no purpose.

Amare looks majestic when he scores or when he goes all out on a block.... as far as the team concept he does nothing. Will we win any more games by playing him over any other guy? No. I think we would be better off letting him go for the Better of the team. Chemistry wise and culture wise. I could be wrong but don't label be a hater cuz i don't like a guy. You can be a dick rider. Anyway it takes away from the conversion

come on man disagreeing is fine but using profanity laced insults is not respectful. Anyway in regards to Amare he is what he is we cant move him because of his salary but he can still be effectiive. Jason Smith is what he is too a big guy off the bench who can shoot and provide some interior defense

I apologize but in the context of being called a hater, I take it as some one disregarding my opinion because of envy. To me that's worse than using a curse word. I don't hate or envy another person. We're talking basketball. I already explained that I don't like Amare and I believe he keeps proving why. My opinion can change just like it had with shump so far in pre season.

Anyway I do apologize but you see where it came from.

I'm not sure "dick riding" constitutes profanity. Some people are just overly sensitive. I don't think you need to apologize.

P.S., I think you've been on point with Amar'e. I like Amar'e the person plenty but Amar'e the player is detrimental to this team.

Just don't want to take away from the conversation

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  12:17 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
EnySpree wrote:Everyone in the team is playing well except these two. Jr Smith is too frustrated with the offense. He came out and said it will take until January for the team to get it. I think by the last pre season game the Knicks will have it down. Shump and thjr are thriving in the new style of play. Looks like jr is the one that needs to sit now.

Amare is not a team ball player. He needs the ball and he wants to score. He wants the offense to focus on him. He thinks highly of himself and wants individual success over team success. You can see it in his body language. Bargs played well enough in the first game to get my support. Jason smith to me won the starting 4 spot. Dalembert won the starting center spot. Quincy Acy deserves minutes too. Amare adds nothing to the equation.

this is the culture change. You want guys to buy in. Your stars have to be the first to buy in. Amare and JR are not buying in. I smell a trade.

You can add Bargnani to that list. He looked good in the first game but I still prefer Jason Smith, Quincy Acy, Samuel Dalembert, Cole Aldrich and Travis Wear to him and Amare. Worse comes to worse, we could always add Kenyon Martin for insurance purposes.

That's how I feel about it too. I give credit when is due though. I would definitely be fine with Jason smith starting with Dalembert and Melo up front. Acy, Bargs and Cole all earned the right to play too.

Amare is now in the wrong team. It's funny how that goes.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/15/2014  12:21 PM
We're trying to change the culture. We're running an offense. We're not paying hero ball. Alot of fans were sick of Melo chucking shots but now we want to get Amare up to speed so we can dump it down to him?

Which is it? Do you want team ball or you want to watch one guy taking all the shots?

I want to win. Except what the Knicks are doing now. Realize who is playing well and formulate a new found love for the Knicks damn it

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/15/2014  12:54 PM
EnySpree wrote:We're trying to change the culture. We're running an offense. We're not paying hero ball. Alot of fans were sick of Melo chucking shots but now we want to get Amare up to speed so we can dump it down to him?

Which is it? Do you want team ball or you want to watch one guy taking all the shots?

I want to win. Except what the Knicks are doing now. Realize who is playing well and formulate a new found love for the Knicks damn it

I don't anticipate that any one player will bring this team down. The system prevents that kind of impact. It's easy for Fish to limit the impact of a single player. If you compare the Triangle to MDA's system it's easier to have problems if the PG and PF/C isn't working because that is the focus of the majority of plays. In the Triangle there isn't the same reliance on individual players. Literally EVERYONE is given a role and that spreads out the responsibility from just a few key players to more of the entire team. For example PG is minimized and everyone has to share in making very simple passes and moving without the ball this makes it harder to shut down by opposing defenses.

If STAT or anyone for that matters becomes a problem they can be removed and another capable big can be inserted. Phil was right to tweak the roster so that it's more versatile and balanced. Rather than relying on the greatness of a single player Phil has refocused the franchise on TEAM. This is a good approach and less prone to disaster if you don't get what you want from one of your top players.

Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

10/15/2014  12:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/15/2014  1:00 PM
EnySpree wrote:We're trying to change the culture. We're running an offense. We're not paying hero ball. Alot of fans were sick of Melo chucking shots but now we want to get Amare up to speed so we can dump it down to him?

Which is it? Do you want team ball or you want to watch one guy taking all the shots?

I want to win. Except what the Knicks are doing now. Realize who is playing well and formulate a new found love for the Knicks damn it

That is the point. Melo was resigned by Phil because he was confident Melo could thrive in the Triangle.

Melo has always been a player who was best used as first option in a well schooled passing game, because he has a quick trigger and he is actually better utilized that way than by having him do ISO sets. But Melo could ISO and get his points too so feeble coaches like Woodson let that become Melo's default play. Melo will be a better player now.

Stat in Phoenix was the ultimate big man on a running team. He was fed the ball in motion most of the time and with his power he thrived in that scenario. After he lost his athleticism, his glaring lack of defense was highlighted further and he had to go back to the drawing board for his offensive moves. He retooled enough to be a player again, but he doesn't fit here now. He remains a liability on defense and I cannot say that like Melo he will be a better player as a result of the system.

That's the big difference between the two. Melo is still our future. Stat is certainly not. And if Stat can't understand the system, why should he expected to play well on the court the same time as Melo now if it was a problem before having a coherent system?

I do understand why some still want him to play, but he is just a lousy fit now.

But I do not understand how his potential point production is continually invoked while his liabilities get swept under the rug. He is well-documented as a plus/minus disaster. How can this be blithely ignored by so many?

His overall contribution within the whole scheme is what matters. His points are not the core story. It is his aggregate impact on the game as a whole which is not good. We have seen so many times how teams go on runs with him on the floor.

I'm not interested in insulting others who value Amare. I think he is simply a deep rotation backup player at best, but I'd be glad if he did not play at all.

We'll get our points while also keeping other teams' production down if we have better defenders than Stat in the game. The spread between our points and the opponents is what matters. We can find 15 points from other players just fine.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Amare and JR smith are the odd men out

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy