TripleThreat wrote:nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Can we apply this same logic to a 7 game win streak in February of 2012 when the combined records of those teams was well below .500?
It's ok Crush. The strength of schedule to end the year wasn't really as important as the fact that the team finally started playing as it should have all year. TripleThreat can try to poo poo the way the team closed the year but it was wins against the same teams we couldn't beat earlier in the year when the team was underperforming.
Here's the underlying issue. We have a group of fans who think this team sucks and is much closer to the 37 wins we saw last year than a playoff team their talent suggests they should be. These same fans don't give any credit to Phil, Fish or the staff as being capable of fielding a winning team. They won't be happy until we have KD, Lebron and CP3! There is no sense of reason about the process of remaking this team and just taking this coming season for what it is. We can't magically change the team. It's a process. Meanwhile Phil isn't just throwing this year away. This team needs to have a good year and establish the new culture for the future.
You mean the teams that the Knicks couldn't beat earlier because many of them were actually TRYING TO WIN instead of tanking and trying to establish early wins so they could rest their players late in the season for setting up for the playoffs?
The typical strength of schedule issues for the NBA and Knicks, including the reality of tanking and half hearted playoff teams near the end of the regular season mean nothing to you because it doesn't fit your specific narrative.
Here's a crazy thought, there are a group of fans here who think the Knicks need to rebuild, that they aren't one amazing comeback STAT season away, that teams right now in the position of the Knicks should treat players like STAT and Bargs as "sunk costs" and accept they have no trade value and have no place in the Knicks future and should focus on using precious minutes on the floor to developing rookies and young players and seeing what you have before you must make the CRITICAL DECISION on them whether to give them a 2nd contract with the team and become part of the team's future core or decide it's a player that you want to trade or let go period.
You use all these quotes from Zen Master and Fisher without realizing that it's just media fluff pieces. Whenever a new coach and new regime comes into town, the press writes a lot of fluff and soft hitting stuff in the preseason and off season for a couple of reasons
1) It costs you nothing to butter yourself up to the new regime. Without their cooperation, you can't get the access and quotes to do your job. Plenty of sports beat writers assigned to cover a specific sports team has lost their job that way, by wrangling a little too hard and too fast with the franchise in place. Those sports writers know they can always be more critical of that regime later, that playing it soft now and letting Zen Master and Fish just give throwaway quotes is good business for them. Also since it's basically a CAA built team, there's general pressure from a powerful agency like CAA to push its influence with the media to give a positive spin right now on the Knicks. Of course Zen Master and Fish are going to talk up all the things they want to do, it gives the media something to write about, it doesn't actually mean when the METAL HITS THE MEAT DURING THE ACTUAL SEASON that they are going to hold to all of that.
2) This is the part of the year where publications and news outlets and such have to do their part to help hype up a team to help sell tickets. Esp those expensive courtside seats and luxury boxes. Many of the same advertisers who support those sites and publications also have a relationship with the NBA and local teams. Hyping up the team is a good business. Again, a team can only market two things, Winning or Hope. Since the Knicks can't offer winning, it can only offer a sense of potential hope to fans this year.
Yes, it's a process. You seem to get jilted when people disagree with your outlandish ideas for how the Knicks should operate in the near future. You'll cherry pick stats to try to prove STAT is going to magically turn this season around for the Knicks, press on for 30 minutes a game and that these random game samples can prove something like Bargs can play defense.
You also seem to fail to understand that part of the reason the Knicks pressed hard at the end last year was because Melo was pressing hard. Why? To try to ensure his appeal as a free agent. To try his best to get courted by the clearly interested Bulls and Rockets. He wasn't trying to showcase himself just to ensure his max contract potential with the Knicks, but also to hope to try to convince the Bulls and Rockets that they should see him as valuable enough to press for a sign and trade since Melo loves his money so much. If Melo could have gotten 120 million from the Rockets or Bulls, he would be GONE.
You also seem to fail to understand that shutting out rookie minutes and trying to win a few more games ( which dooms you to the treadmill cycle, just good enough to barely fight for that last playoff spot, but never quite bad enough to get that high draft pick to get an impact rookie that can really help you for the future) isn't going to set up this culture that free agents care about. No one cared about Cleveland as a destination. LeBron goes back and now it's a hot spot. Squeaking out a few more wins from playing veterans who aren't part of your future isn't going to magically draw free agents to you. Having a roster that offers youth, upside, draft picks and cap flexibility will entice them.
It is a "process", you just don't seem to understand it ( how the media works, that this team needs to actually rebuild, that you can't ask the current Knicks to do things the current Spurs are doing and expect the same results, that skewing stats like you do doesn't change that overpaid far in decline veterans on the roster that Zen Master couldn't get rid of in the off season have no real future on this team)
You don't get it, Phil Jackson isn't throwing this year away because the past decade of ineptitude and poor management and just caving into Melo's demands have ALREADY THROWN THIS SEASON AWAY. The Knicks started the offseason with NO DRAFT PICKS in what was seen as one of the deepest drafts in recent NBA history. They are a luxury tax paying team that is poorly constructed with team killing contracts that can't be jettisoned yet and had the team morale sapping trifecta of having burned out or traded away so many of it's future draft picks, had no real stable of young players on rookie contracts with upside who were seen as breaking out and outperforming said contracts and due to the Melo resigning lost much of it's cap flexibility.
The Knicks don't have the luxury of playing a Spurs like rotation.
Yes, there are a "group of fans" different from you. The ones who think the Knicks would be better off doing WHAT EVERY OTHER REBUILDING TEAM IN THE LEAGUE IS DOING. Which is giving young players minutes to see what you have, accept losing now is part of the process, trying to gain more assets, trying not to lock into bad contracts and players and seeing a long term vision of success, not hopping onto the 8th seed chase/treadmill of doom.
And CrushAlot, if you can't see the difference between Linsanity ( where the team was winning because of team basketball, buying into doing what's right for the entire team, giving gritty and gusty defensive performances, seeing a young high IQ player and leader emerge who cost the Knicks nothing but filled the biggest weakness on the team) and last year's "Melo Wants His Cash" end of the year drive against teams already given up or thinking about the playoffs, then I don't know what to say.
Dude you are living in a box of some sorts, you're entire post is clouded with assumptions and hate. First of all, every beat writer and NBA analysis through out the country acknowledge that melo had his best season last yr, weather a contract yr or not, he was playing hard from day 1 of the season. Every player in NBA history turns it up in a contract yr.
Jackson has never ever, not even remotely,have been accuse of fluffing up expectations from any team he has been associated with. I don't think you quite understand the NBA or the recipe for success, because it goes way beyond the court. It starts with the mental, something that woodson and MDA have no idea, or just ain't deep enough to translate that to their players.
When you realize that the knicks didn't lose (last yr) because of the lack of talent, more then it was the lack of preparation, and understanding their roles, you will come to appreciate more, what Phil brings.
You want me to believe that a MAN who has 11 titles is fluffing up the roster to make CAA and the fans happy and excited. Not only has phil won 11 titles, 2 of them he earned as a player in what was (arguable) the most unselfish roster in knicks history. The garden was top 10 in attendance when we won 23 games, the garden was selling out when we we were in the middle of a 8 game losing streak, you don't need to hype sht up to sell tickets to a knick game.
Some of You guys need to wake the hell up and stop clamoring for young guys to get playing time so you can evaluate them for the future, who the hell does that but a bottom feed lottery team .