NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Dalembert in my humble opinion is better than Tyson....they would get the same stats if given the same minutes, except Dalembert is a better shot blocker by far. Also as far as intangibles, the dude can score in the post. Tysn can't score in the post at all. Same can actually receive the ball and make a decisive move in the paint, especially after a rebound....Sam also will drop fools to the ground if need be. That's something Tyson refused to do as a Knick. Sam can also knock down the jumpshot, whether wide open or on the move.I love the deal and I hope Sam is apart of our future. I've always been a huge fan of his.
Samuel Dalembert is trash. There's a reason why he can't stick with a team anymore and why the Mavericks traded for Tyson Chandler.
Tyson was a bum to before he landed in Dallas.....he was coming off a horrible season in Charlotte with the Bobcats before he was picked up by Dallas. He rode those coattails in Dallas and it got him 14 million a year from the stupid ass Knicks.
So it's a matter of opportunity.
The truth is Samuel Dalembert puts up better stats than Tyson per 36 mins.....Sam actually has basic fundamental basketball skills, which Tyson absolutely does not.
State facts my friend not just bull****. Dalembert played well in the playoffs this year too. If he was given the minutes Tyson gets he would get significantly better stats. I'ts not about the numbers either because like I said Tyson has no fundamental basketball skills. Sam on the other hand does.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast
https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC
https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast