Posted by Chico:
those reasons aren't remotely good enough to ban someone. its censorship. let him back. look i disagree with him. i disagree with you. i disagree with lots of people. who wants a board where everyone agrees? its unamerican. even if 99 of his posts are lame or stupid, one is gonna be good. i certainly believe 999 out of every thousand posts on the realgm boards are retarded poppycock, but that one out of a thousand makes it worth checking every couple of days.
chico, i'll engage you on this. What do you mean about "those reasons aren't remotely good enough to ban someone". I have posted - one page back - why Andrew and I ban posters. Let me know how you feel about them. Andrew and I are trying to create a space where people can come back and have good converstaion about Knicks, and we hold that as out standard. Nothing more.
