[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

SAS reporting Brian Shaw to Knicks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/16/2014  3:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/16/2014  3:02 PM
shaw trying to get out of his contract. He wasn't a great fit in Denver so they might allow him to leave without compensation.

It's a no brainer if that happens and we don't give up a pick. I will believe it when I see it. Shaw is Phil's #1 guy ahead of Kerr even. He will be a more commanding figure than fisher, Lue or Walton imo. Was one of Phil's top assistants for a long time

If it requires even a 2nd round pick than I go elsewhere
AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
5/16/2014  3:04 PM
I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well
so here is what phil is thinking ....
Swishfm3
Posts: 23312
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
5/16/2014  3:42 PM
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

good question.

Maybe he didn't feel he had the right personnel to implement it in Denver?....or maybe he's just not a fan of it.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/16/2014  3:45 PM
No Phil to back him up with support
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538
5/16/2014  4:15 PM
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538
5/16/2014  4:16 PM
What does Woj. say?
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
5/16/2014  4:23 PM
So it's Dunleavy, Shaw, Fisher, and Marc Jackson- glad these journalists aren't just making stuff up!
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
5/16/2014  4:23 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.

I could see Gallo and Chandler being successful in a triangle.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/16/2014  4:25 PM
smackeddog wrote:So it's Dunleavy, Shaw, Fisher, and Marc Jackson- glad these journalists aren't just making stuff up!

Who is saying anything about Mark Jackson? Also you are forgetting Lue and Walton
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
5/16/2014  4:40 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
smackeddog wrote:So it's Dunleavy, Shaw, Fisher, and Marc Jackson- glad these journalists aren't just making stuff up!

Who is saying anything about Mark Jackson? Also you are forgetting Lue and Walton

A couple of articles said Phil was no willing to look outside the triangle so Marc is an option. It's completely made up by them because they think it's what Knick fans want.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/16/2014  4:44 PM
Oh you mean Marc Jackson the former Warrior PF/C?
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39941
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/16/2014  4:45 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.


Shaw was following management's wishes. I think Shaw was anxious for almost any job after being turned so many times.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/16/2014  4:54 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.


Shaw was following management's wishes. I think Shaw was anxious for almost any job after being turned so many times.

Are you sure that was the case? I thought he had been highly coveted for a couple of years and wanted to take his time until the right job came along. I could be wrong though.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39941
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
5/16/2014  4:59 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/16/2014  5:03 PM
Knixkik wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.


Shaw was following management's wishes. I think Shaw was anxious for almost any job after being turned so many times.

Are you sure that was the case? I thought he had been highly coveted for a couple of years and wanted to take his time until the right job came along. I could be wrong though.


Yeah and then he got passed over for the Lakers sand GSW jobs. Everyone thought he was a shoe in to replace Phil, but Mike Brown got hired. He also got passed over the Nets and 76ers jobs.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
5/16/2014  4:59 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Oh you mean Marc Jackson the former Warrior PF/C?

Ha! Yes- he's my prediction! (I have an inside source)
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/16/2014  5:00 PM
lol
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/16/2014  5:48 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:I wonder why shaw did not implement the triangle if he knew it so well

J. McGee says hello. Maybe Moz would have been good but Hickson and Faried are not good fits. If Faried was a better defender he could have settled into a Rodman like role but his lack of skills in that area coupled with not being a good high post player or passer would not work.

Not looking at their numbers, I think there off reb. #s were good though which is great for a triangle big.


Shaw was following management's wishes. I think Shaw was anxious for almost any job after being turned so many times.

Are you sure that was the case? I thought he had been highly coveted for a couple of years and wanted to take his time until the right job came along. I could be wrong though.


Yeah and then he got passed over for the Lakers sand GSW jobs. Everyone thought he was a shoe in to replace Phil, but Mike Brown got hired. He also got passed over the Nets and 76ers jobs.

Ok now i remember the lakers and Nets jobs, don't remember him getting passed over on the other 2.
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/16/2014  5:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/16/2014  5:58 PM
I think Kerr as Head Coach and Brian Shaw as leading assistant would have been great
Fisher as one of the assistants with some of the other rumored assistants

Along with Ron Harper, Pippen, Kukoc, and Rasheed Wallace as development/assistant coaches
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/16/2014  6:02 PM
I would offer Duncan a Kerr like contract to see if he bites

His solid fundentals, experience, knowledge, respect, work ethic, championship pedigree, proffesionalism, and the greatest student of Poppavich's himself would attract and develop talents
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
5/16/2014  6:14 PM
RonRon wrote:I would offer Duncan a Kerr like contract to see if he bites

His solid fundentals, experience, knowledge, respect, work ethic, championship pedigree, proffesionalism, and the greatest student of Poppavich's himself would attract and develop talents

Thats very interesting ... talk about a slap to Ewing but Duncan will certainly be a coach or Gm in the future (if he wants to be).

Got me thinking ... How about Shane Battier?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
« Reply To Topic
SAS reporting Brian Shaw to Knicks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy