CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:maybe he had a better chance today if he played copeland

Nice.

I feel a playa2 post coming.

BigDaddyG wrote:

mreinman wrote:maybe he had a better chance today if he played copeland

Lol yeah. Cope played less with Indiana than he did with us. Also, I think we should have made that Teague trade. What was it again? Shump straight up?

I think that the knicks insisted that they take back Felton in the deal.

mreinman wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

mreinman wrote:maybe he had a better chance today if he played copeland

Nice.

I feel a playa2 post coming.

thought he got the boot??

He may have. I didn't know that he did.

mreinman wrote:

BigDaddyG wrote:

mreinman wrote:maybe he had a better chance today if he played copeland

Lol yeah. Cope played less with Indiana than he did with us. Also, I think we should have made that Teague trade. What was it again? Shump straight up?

I think that the knicks insisted that they take back Felton in the deal.

Hindsight is 20/20. We should've just kept Felton and waited for the gun charge conviction. We would'v had a solid PG and gotten rid of Felton.

holfresh wrote:

tkf wrote:

holfresh wrote:Paul Pierce showed you why you put the ball in the hands of a closer time and time again...

dude what are you hinting at? I don't think anyone needed to see Pierce hit that shot to know how much of a clutch playoff performer he is...dude won MVP of the finals... are you trying to live vicariously through another player? hey it would be nice to have a player like that.. hopefully the knicks get a player like that one day.

or better yet why not get a player like teague and a coach like atlanta has and just win in blow out fashion... I do find it funny how knicks fans felt the hawks should be trying to miss the playoffs as if they were not deserving..LOL.... but we were deserving and couldn't catch a team that was losing at an alarming rate without their best player...

Is it willful ignorance or just in denial ??..U can look up it up yourself on who some of the most clutch players the last five years have been..Melo is all over those list..

you must be kidding me... how can you sit here and talk about clutch.. this dude has not hit a clutch shot in the playoffs that I can recall.. tell me holfresh, when has carmelo been clutch in the playoffs? how about regular season. Dude you are delusional when it comes to carmelo and this team... I bet you still think the knicks have a shot at the playoffs this year and that the games being played now are all a joke... you just don't get it..

Carmelo has been a brick shooting chucker in a kNicks uniform and a playoff busta... look on the list of playoff bustas and he is all over it...

The ref's ruined the Warriors/Clips game- I found it almost unwatchable.

BigDaddyG wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

Uptown wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:Posters didn't want to trade Shump for reddick. smh.

Still don't. We need 2way players. We already have THJ for Reddicks role. I can't wait to see Shump next year after giving the vote of confidence from Phil

+1....I always hated the small lineup with Melo @ the 4 and 6'5 Shump @ SF. People wonder why Shump isn't as good now, as he was on the defensive end during his rookie year. Look no further than Woodson playing him @ SF. Can see Shump playing the Ron Harper role for us next year. Shump is better off playing the 2 and some 1 as opposed to play SF.....

Exactly look at his perimeter D when Woodless finally put him back at the 2 albeit off the bench

I think that is an excuse. Shump is a good on ball defender at times but needs to expand his defensive skills. I hope he can round out his game but I am very skeptical.

Shump isn't as good because he dropped from shooting 40% from three to 33%. It doesn't matter if the lineup is small or big. It kills your offense if you have a wing player who poses no threat on offense.

I'm talking defensivley....

Granger leaving lockeroom might have an impact.