“We already made our moves with Shannon and Earl,’’ Woodson said. “Then [Jimmer] got released right after we made our moves. There really was no considerations there.’’

Knicks really have their collective heads up their ass. Really frustrating. Didn't watch the game this afternoon. I did look at the box score to see who played how many minutes and what they did with them. I'm shocked at how consistently bad some nameless people have played al damn season and they are still getting major minutes....and the losses keep piling up.

Is he a good fit here? Would he have helped us get to the playoffs?

Lets get real here fellas, Jimmer will be available this summer.

Nalod wrote:Jimmer is a free agent this summer. He can help a good team.

Is he a good fit here? Would he have helped us get to the playoffs?

Lets get real here fellas, Jimmer will be available this summer.

He might be available, but then the Bulls kinda get first shot.

And as far as his fit here - granted, the Knicks are a soap opera, and I don't wish that on anyone - but the fact is he is better and younger than anyone we have as a PG candidate on the roster now.

I mean, Pablo is nearly 40. Felton may end up doing 40!

PG has been a problem all season. What are we watching and seeing that the Knick FO isn't? Or vice a versa?

Vmart wrote:

franco12 wrote:

Nalod wrote:Jimmer is a free agent this summer. He can help a good team.

Is he a good fit here? Would he have helped us get to the playoffs?

Lets get real here fellas, Jimmer will be available this summer.

He might be available, but then the Bulls kinda get first shot.

And as far as his fit here - granted, the Knicks are a soap opera, and I don't wish that on anyone - but the fact is he is better and younger than anyone we have as a PG candidate on the roster now.

I mean, Pablo is nearly 40. Felton may end up doing 40!

PG has been a problem all season. What are we watching and seeing that the Knick FO isn't? Or vice a versa?

LOL the 40-40 club.

And you can add JR - as I am sure Woodson would let him shoot 0 for 40 in a game if needed!

Go to the Bulls who will make the playoffs and only have 2 PGs on their roster or go to the Knicks who are a hot mess with 3 PGs on their roster?

Rookie wrote:

martin wrote:Why is this even a question?

Go to the Bulls who will make the playoffs and only have 2 PGs on their roster or go to the Knicks who are a hot mess with 3 PGs on their roster?

It's not a question of what Jimmer did, it's more an indictment of what we didn't do. It's not like the roster was so improved by adding Brown and Clark that we wouldn't continue to look at available players. Never on Knicks radar? Since when does a team that is a hot mess stand pat? PG is a position that with just the slightest of improvement in efficiency ould lead to more wins. Not even inquiring about an available PG who was vocal about wanting to be drafted by the Knicks. We need a new ****ing radar man

Jimmer made mention of the fact that he liked how hard the Bulls played.

I doubt we figured that he was too smart to come here - our FO is a disaster.

But whether or not the Bulls are going to make the play offs, Martin, the fact is that he could (with a real coach/more stable environment) probably get more playing time here with the three PGs we have (don't know I would call any of them PGs, but whatever!) vs. Chicago. That, closer to home, bigger stage, etc.

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/fredette-playing-knicks-lot-fun-article-1.1709589