1)
c-camby, foyle

or

2)
c-dampier, nazr

assuming we have to move kurt to make either deal happen.

i myself like #1. it would also alow us to move nazr to pf where he belongs (either as backup or starter).

it makes us more athletic and way better defensivly. we do lose a bit of paint points but i thibk sweets will make up for that next year.

i dont know how or even if camby would come back, just a hypothetical situation thats all.

IMO, Kurt has to go. However, Dampier/Naser could be a deadly combo. They are both interchangeable at the Center/PF position. We would have two backups at both positions

Sweet/Naser PF
Damp/Vinny Center

or
Sweet/Vinny
Damp/Naser

I would rather have none of those guys.

Camby has been injury prone and SHOCK had a good year before he was a free agent.

Dampier has been lazy and unmotivated, is older, and SHOCK had a good yaer before he was a free agent.

Foyle does nothing for me. He's a good shotblocker, but how are you going to get him.

Guys pull this act in the 3 major sports. Put up insane numbers, sign a new deal, and return to mediocrity.

Youth.

I don't want these old parts, go with the youth movement.

this is why I want Blount the more and more I think about it. He's a selfmade man.. just tons of hard work. Get him an you can move Kurt/Nazr/Deke in some kind of bad contract + good draft pick trade. Something like KT, #2, $3 mill for Booth and Sea #1. Whatever...