[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why is Shump still starting??...
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/10/2014  4:25 PM

Shump has looked really bad and it's time to move on...We essentially have 4 guys in the starting lineup who has difficulty scoring...Chandler is dogging it and I'm glad Hubie pointed it out on National TV..Chandler seems to only wake up on offensive touches...We need to cut Feltons minutes to 25/28 mins per to allow him to be in attack mode every time on the court...He can't play the entire game at that pace...Melo is playing hard and it's affecting him game in the 4th quarters...He can't continue to log the most minutes in the NBA...Prig passed up a layup again to hit a point shooter..It's maddening...We have to use Amare offensively anytime he is in the game..He doesn't do much else and it's hard to watch him coming out on the perimeter to guard someone... His lateral movement are almost gone...

Yet another top tier team showed the Knicks a little pressure and they wilted...
AUTOADVERT
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/10/2014  4:52 PM
holfresh wrote:
Shump has looked really bad and it's time to move on...We essentially have 4 guys in the starting lineup who has difficulty scoring...Chandler is dogging it and I'm glad Hubie pointed it out on National TV..Chandler seems to only wake up on offensive touches...We need to cut Feltons minutes to 25/28 mins per to allow him to be in attack mode every time on the court...He can't play the entire game at that pace...Melo is playing hard and it's affecting him game in the 4th quarters...He can't continue to log the most minutes in the NBA...Prig passed up a layup again to hit a point shooter..It's maddening...We have to use Amare offensively anytime he is in the game..He doesn't do much else and it's hard to watch him coming out on the perimeter to guard someone... His lateral movement are almost gone...

Yet another top tier team showed the Knicks a little pressure and they wilted...

How can you ask these obvious question then say it's not the coach..smh, becuase most of us are asking ourselves these same exact questions..

ES
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/10/2014  5:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2014  5:30 PM
I feel for Shump. His rookie year he was one of teh best perimeter defenders in the nba I still think that ACL injur really hurt him. Also the trade rumors really go to him. I think he needs a fresh start somewhere else. I wiuld liek to see Hardaway get more time
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/10/2014  6:50 PM
holfresh wrote:
Shump has looked really bad and it's time to move on...We essentially have 4 guys in the starting lineup who has difficulty scoring...Chandler is dogging it and I'm glad Hubie pointed it out on National TV..Chandler seems to only wake up on offensive touches...We need to cut Feltons minutes to 25/28 mins per to allow him to be in attack mode every time on the court...He can't play the entire game at that pace...Melo is playing hard and it's affecting him game in the 4th quarters...He can't continue to log the most minutes in the NBA...Prig passed up a layup again to hit a point shooter..It's maddening...We have to use Amare offensively anytime he is in the game..He doesn't do much else and it's hard to watch him coming out on the perimeter to guard someone... His lateral movement are almost gone...

Yet another top tier team showed the Knicks a little pressure and they wilted...
Wow Hubie pointed out Chandler's lazy play. I only saw the first quarter as we had a family event. Everything you said he said is what I see. Chandler is constantly calling for the ball on offense but just watches guys penetrate and take the ball to the rim on defense. Agree about Shump. Shump is like an athletic dleague player at this point. No reason for him to start or even play. Also, Knicks need to move on from Tyson's finger pointing, back stabbing non defending ways. If there is a deal for him they need to do it.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/10/2014  6:57 PM
I think this is a fair question. I'd like to see Woodson (anyone in there?) try to shake things up with a new line up - get Amar'e in the SL. Move Chandler to the bench. Move Shump to the bench- and go with either JR or THjr.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/10/2014  7:33 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2014  7:34 PM
franco12 wrote:I think this is a fair question. I'd like to see Woodson (anyone in there?) try to shake things up with a new line up - get Amar'e in the SL. Move Chandler to the bench. Move Shump to the bench- and go with either JR or THjr.

That would be great. I don't think shump gets off the bench and maybe Tyson sits for a couple of games so he can use his keen observation skills when he comes back to explain his poor play and negative impact on the team. Woodson could go with a strong 8 man rotation with Tyler, jr or Tim, and Metta off the bench. Give cole any leftover big man minutes.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
blkexec
Posts: 28339
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
2/10/2014  8:23 PM
Woodson will go down with chandler and shump....As a so called defensive coach...He will go down with the only defensive players on the team....
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/10/2014  8:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2014  8:27 PM
blkexec wrote:Woodson will go down with chandler and shump....As a so called defensive coach...He will go down with the only defensive players on the team....
The problem is that both chandler and shump have regressed defensuvely. two years ago both were tremdenous. One was a DPOTY and one was one of the best perimeter defenders as a rookie
Dagger
Posts: 22065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/12/2012
Member: #4184

2/10/2014  8:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/10/2014  8:41 PM
blkexec wrote:Woodson will go down with chandler and shump....As a so called defensive coach...He will go down with the only defensive players on the team....

A plausible theory if not for the fact that Shumpert and Chandler are probably the two players that despise Woodson most on the entire roster.

blkexec
Posts: 28339
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
2/11/2014  6:49 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/11/2014  6:57 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
blkexec wrote:Woodson will go down with chandler and shump....As a so called defensive coach...He will go down with the only defensive players on the team....
The problem is that both chandler and shump have regressed defensuvely. two years ago both were tremdenous. One was a DPOTY and one was one of the best perimeter defenders as a rookie

And this is why we are so bad. ... Our Top defensive players have regressed. While our old aka meta and young guns are hungry on the bench. Woodson is just as stubborn as mda. I thought Woodson would be an upgrade. ... but I now see he's a defensive version of MDA . Both are decent coaches when they have a team that covers their deficiencies. Otherwise they are not fit for high profile head coaching jobs in a major market like NY or LA.

Since Dolan isn't going anywhere....we need a Coach that's adaptable to any roster style. ...similar to Boston celtic coach. These old Larry brown / Phil Jackson types will not work with dolans micromanagement style or lack of basketball management IQ.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2014  6:56 AM
blkexec wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
blkexec wrote:Woodson will go down with chandler and shump....As a so called defensive coach...He will go down with the only defensive players on the team....
The problem is that both chandler and shump have regressed defensuvely. two years ago both were tremdenous. One was a DPOTY and one was one of the best perimeter defenders as a rookie

And this is why we are so bad. ... Our Top defensive players have regressed. While our old aka meta and young guns are hungry on the bench. Woodson is just as stubborn as mda. I thought Woodson would be an upgrade. ... but I now see he's a defensive version of MDA . Both are decent coaches when they have a team that covers their deficiencies. Otherwise they are not fit for high profile head coaching jobs in a major market like NY or LA.


It might be one of many reasons. Our team is bad on offense too.
blkexec
Posts: 28339
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
2/11/2014  6:58 AM
Since Dolan isn't going anywhere....we need a Coach that's adaptable to any roster style. ...similar to Boston celtic coach. These old Larry brown / Phil Jackson types will not work with dolans micromanagement style or lack of basketball management IQ.
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
2/11/2014  7:33 AM    LAST EDITED: 2/11/2014  7:47 AM
In the starting lineup

there are 4 mismatches

(MELO can be one at the 4, sometimes he is not, but I do think that Melo plays his best basketball at the 4)

Chandler is the best defender but he is also slow, in addition to most of the entire SL
We lack mobility, trust, constantly playing TEAM DEF, demanding help way too much by going through screen easily
Yes, Iman, Felton, and Chandler have regressed this year
JR took a big step backwards, his loss of athleticism is one of the reasons he isn't one of the better rebounders, defender, and playmaker this year

Iman should have been developed at SG/PG from the start of his career instead of moving to the SF where he is just another liability
Him playing at SF is detrimental to his development and is a liability for the Knicks
There is no confidence in Woodson's system's/philosophy on both ends and it has been showing
He is sacrificing for the better of the team, but it is going unappreciated

Woodson not doing anything about this, not trying to adjust to this, and not acknowledging this is the greatest problem
The players have taken things in their own hands and have not figured it out


We are not a very good team and giving Melo the opportunity to walk away for NOTHING is the biggest problem, he likely will
And if he doesn't and does indeed stay for a max contract, I rather he walk away signing with a team than overpaying him for a max contract
While we can actually rebuild in a quick 1.5 years, if we trade Melo for some picks/assets, along with trading some of our cap killers/Tyson Chandler and breaking up the team for whatever assets we could use to build a foundation with 2015's UFA' with a CORE of FA's in addition to the development of our young players

You can sell NYK's fans on rebuilding for 1.5 years, we cannot sell the team on sucking for another 5-10years, which would result in giving Melo 1/2 of the entire cap for a 12 man roster
It isn't money well spent, while other teams in the league will preserver salary, have young players/draft picks to develop, in addition to the cap space to sign multiple players while we can just sit there and watch, DOING NOTHING, because we will be left with the crap players with the salary cap left to use


I don't know HOLFRESH, you seem to be more focused on Melo than the future of the Knick's franchise
What is the point, you will blame the lack of talent on the team like you currently are, but you are unwilling to admit that resigning Melo at a max contract will result in the inability to build a team

Why pay Melo more, a player like Kevin Love at 17m, with another 11-13m, that would be equivalent to what Melo would be making in 2015
Now how you spend that extra money, whether for 1-3 players, would be much greater than what Melo would be
I think Kevin Love > Melo at the next contract *Melo's will be 35-36* and will be in huge decline like many NBA players around the age of 30*

Tmac
Steve Frachise
Marbury

Gereld Wallace
Ginobili
Fred Jones

along with many players, I would much rather the cap room, now if we can get some pick's to use to build around in 2015, that would be great
Along with moving Tyson Chandler and some bad contracts, for some assets
While focusing on development of our current players, tanking in 2014, utilizing the MLE this summer for TALENT, and building a plan for our future

But continue to root for Melo and blame the lack of talent around him because it will be the same story, another year, another game as he gets older and his flaws will get even more exposed

This is not an attack on Melo, this is about building and assembling the best possible team in order to contend, with 2015 so close away as probably the best FA's pool with UFA's in one season, and many teams/players seem to want to build a core of 2-4 STAR's because that is what the contending teams currently have and need in order to contend

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2014  7:34 AM
We need a coach who can take a team with the worst back-court in the league and a bunch of good but overpaid players in the front-court, and achieve great things.
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2014  8:18 AM
because the Knicks are better when he's on the floor, and thats a fact:
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314NYK.HTM

When Shump plays Knicks are +
When Shump sits Knicks are - (by alot)

Fact is Knicks are + with Melo, Shump, KMart and Prigs.

What does that tell you?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

2/11/2014  8:30 AM
fishmike wrote:because the Knicks are better when he's on the floor, and thats a fact:
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314NYK.HTM

When Shump plays Knicks are +
When Shump sits Knicks are - (by alot)

Fact is Knicks are + with Melo, Shump, KMart and Prigs.

What does that tell you?

Knicks are 20-31

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
fishmike
Posts: 53864
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/11/2014  8:43 AM
EnySpree wrote:
fishmike wrote:because the Knicks are better when he's on the floor, and thats a fact:
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314NYK.HTM

When Shump plays Knicks are +
When Shump sits Knicks are - (by alot)

Fact is Knicks are + with Melo, Shump, KMart and Prigs.

What does that tell you?

Knicks are 20-31

I hear you.. But Shump is going through growing pains. This is the Knicks. Do you elect to work with a struggling young player or dump him for the first shiney new object?

I mean when was the last time the Knicks actually rode out a young player's struggles do see him eventually become pretty good?

Let Ariza walk. Lin walk. Lee walk. Nate walk. We have given up on a lot of guys who are playing good ball around the league. Hell even Jordan Hill is playing pretty well.

Folks here talk about coveting draft picks in one thread, then want to trade all their young guys the minute they hit any kind of wall.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
sealy
Posts: 20683
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/1/2010
Member: #3291
USA
2/11/2014  8:52 AM
fishmike wrote:
EnySpree wrote:
fishmike wrote:because the Knicks are better when he's on the floor, and thats a fact:
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314NYK.HTM

When Shump plays Knicks are +
When Shump sits Knicks are - (by alot)

Fact is Knicks are + with Melo, Shump, KMart and Prigs.

What does that tell you?

Knicks are 20-31

I hear you.. But Shump is going through growing pains. This is the Knicks. Do you elect to work with a struggling young player or dump him for the first shiney new object?

I mean when was the last time the Knicks actually rode out a young player's struggles do see him eventually become pretty good?

Let Ariza walk. Lin walk. Lee walk. Nate walk. We have given up on a lot of guys who are playing good ball around the league. Hell even Jordan Hill is playing pretty well.

Folks here talk about coveting draft picks in one thread, then want to trade all their young guys the minute they hit any kind of wall.

good post. I think he still has alot of upside.

fitzfarm
Posts: 25165
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

2/11/2014  9:16 AM
This is Woodsons downfall... He's pretty stubborn and can't adjust. Got to give props he always played the players that gave him the best chance to win. Woodson should know he has one foot out the door and switch things up. It's not just shump it's his whole rotation. I've never got so excited when subs come in. But with this team I do especially when he takes chandler and shump,and ray out and we start playing well. Then he messes with the chemistry by subbing in those three when we are playing better with them off the court. I'm surprised we don't have a numbers guy on the team that tells woody his most successful line ups and to stick to them.... I yell at my tv when I see Woodson change our best line up. Of Tyler,amar'e,melo,thjr,Pablo this is our best plus minus line up and should be playing together for 35 minutes a game. Woodson wants to save his job he needs to start that line up
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/11/2014  9:29 AM
fishmike wrote:because the Knicks are better when he's on the floor, and thats a fact:
http://www.82games.com/1314/1314NYK.HTM

When Shump plays Knicks are +
When Shump sits Knicks are - (by alot)

Fact is Knicks are + with Melo, Shump, KMart and Prigs.

What does that tell you?


He plays at the same time as our only player with a good +/-. So of course his will be good too.
Why is Shump still starting??...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy