[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

With Bargs out--Id go to a smaller faster line up 9 man
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/24/2014  2:57 AM
C-Tyson
F-Carmelo
F-Shumpert
SG Hardaway JR
PG Felton

C-Aldrich
G Prigs
G-Smith
G-Udirih

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359
1/24/2014  3:05 AM
You gotta,

don't know if Woody has the time to make that type of adjustment on the fly, you would need at least a training camp to implement change like this,

so we gotta slug it out somehow and box for a while.

truth to face: bargs played like a 6'2" guy, so it's really not like we're losing a big--- real talk. this that and the third. word is bond.

The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/24/2014  7:04 AM
BRIGGS wrote:C-Tyson
F-Carmelo
F-Shumpert
SG Hardaway JR
PG Felton

C-Aldrich
G Prigs
G-Smith
G-Udirih

didn't realize we had 9 healthy players?

What about Tyler- I think he might get off the bench before Aldrich.

Woody won't start Hardawy JR- he'll probably go with Prigs and bring Beno in when needed with JR and Hardaway spotting in at the SF & SG spots respectively. Tyler first big off the bench to spot Tyson.

He has no real choice but to use a smaller line up.


Best thing that can happen is Melo gets injured - with all his minutes, just a matter of time.
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694
1/24/2014  7:09 AM
i send tyson to the bench and promote jr smith to start. also send felton to bench and start toure murry. switch all day on defense baby. carmelo's job being the hardest of course. but on offense we have a super fast lineup.
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/24/2014  7:57 AM
I thought you said Tyson can't be part of a faster lineup?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/24/2014  8:20 AM
id take felton out of the lineup.. he's been absolutely god awful
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/24/2014  8:25 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/24/2014  8:50 AM
Forget Felton

It's time to audition. Starters:

C Tyson, back up your talk
F Tyler, for rebounding and defensive presence
F Melo, point forward, has never missed the playoffs in his career
SG Hardaway JR, yes, he can play
PG Murry, defensive ability, long live the BBC


Next

F - Shumpert, sixth man
G - Prigs, 15 good minutes
G - Smith, do something other than shoot


C - Aldrich
G - Udrih

once a knick always a knick
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/24/2014  8:56 AM
misterearl wrote:Forget Felton

It's time to audition. Starters:

C Tyson, back up your talk
F Tyler, for rebounding and defensive presence
F Melo, point forward, has never missed the playoffs in his career
SG Hardaway JR, yes, he can play
PG Murry, defensive ability, long live the BBC


Next

F - Shumpert, sixth man
G - Prigs, 15 good minutes
G - Smith, do something other than shoot


C - Aldrich
G - Udrih

Never happen, but I like it.

I don't mind Felton when he is playing well. He's probably just in the wrong shape right now (round, out of-)
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
1/24/2014  9:24 AM
franco12 wrote:
misterearl wrote:Forget Felton

It's time to audition. Starters:

C Tyson, back up your talk
F Tyler, for rebounding and defensive presence
F Melo, point forward, has never missed the playoffs in his career
SG Hardaway JR, yes, he can play
PG Murry, defensive ability, long live the BBC


Next

F - Shumpert, sixth man
G - Prigs, 15 good minutes
G - Smith, do something other than shoot


C - Aldrich
G - Udrih

Never happen, but I like it.

I don't mind Felton when he is playing well. He's probably just in the wrong shape right now (round, out of-)

This is going for most of his NBA career.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/24/2014  9:28 AM
BRIGGS - what makes Felton faster?

Go big or get out rebounded

once a knick always a knick
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/24/2014  4:59 PM
BRIGGS wrote:C-Tyson
F-Carmelo
F-Shumpert
SG Hardaway JR
PG Felton

C-Aldrich
G Prigs
G-Smith
G-Udirih

prigioni-- better orchestrator
hardaway jr-- good shooter, good energy
shumpert-- he can hit that corner three
anthony-- necessary evil
aldrich-- bigger body, stronger legs and can board, tyson's minutes should be limited

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
1/24/2014  5:27 PM
Once Amare comes back he should start.
Melo sf
Amare PF
Chandler c
Hardaway sg
Felton pg
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/24/2014  11:35 PM
Biggest difference between last year and this year bargs. Remove him and look what happened. I knew it the second I heard bargs was done
RIP Crushalot😞
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
1/24/2014  11:50 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Biggest difference between last year and this year bargs. Remove him and look what happened. I knew it the second I heard bargs was done
I liked Bargs. I think you needed to remove a big. Tyson or Bargs. Tyson barely played tonight. Left the game with a little more than 5 minutes left in the first and didn't return until the third quarter. Tyson was brought in for d, intangibles, chemistry, leadership and a championship pedigree. I have found him to be really disappointing in all of the areas that are supposed to be his strengths. Tyler was really impressive. I liked the Tyler bargs pairing in the limited minutes they played together. Knicks should check out the market for Tyson. He is a luxury on the knicks if you like what he brings. The locker room drama, poor play, losing streaks that occur when he comes back aren't worth 15 mil in my opinion.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/24/2014  11:59 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Biggest difference between last year and this year bargs. Remove him and look what happened. I knew it the second I heard bargs was done
I liked Bargs. I think you needed to remove a big. Tyson or Bargs. Tyson barely played tonight. Left the game with a little more than 5 minutes left in the first and didn't return until the third quarter. Tyson was brought in for d, intangibles, chemistry, leadership and a championship pedigree. I have found him to be really disappointing in all of the areas that are supposed to be his strengths. Tyler was really impressive. I liked the Tyler bargs pairing in the limited minutes they played together. Knicks should check out the market for Tyson. He is a luxury on the knicks if you like what he brings. The locker room drama, poor play, losing streaks that occur when he comes back aren't worth 15 mil in my opinion.

Bargs is probably one of the best players we had who actually would not settle for jacking a jump shot and actually drive to the hoop.

Tyson and Bargs should never have seen court time together.

I agree- Tyson is a luxury and if we can move him for value- a PG- then by all means - lets try.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/27/2014  2:13 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Biggest difference between last year and this year bargs. Remove him and look what happened. I knew it the second I heard bargs was done
I liked Bargs. I think you needed to remove a big. Tyson or Bargs. Tyson barely played tonight. Left the game with a little more than 5 minutes left in the first and didn't return until the third quarter. Tyson was brought in for d, intangibles, chemistry, leadership and a championship pedigree. I have found him to be really disappointing in all of the areas that are supposed to be his strengths. Tyler was really impressive. I liked the Tyler bargs pairing in the limited minutes they played together. Knicks should check out the market for Tyson. He is a luxury on the knicks if you like what he brings. The locker room drama, poor play, losing streaks that occur when he comes back aren't worth 15 mil in my opinion.

Nope bargs is an inconsistent teases of a player. Its pretty simple--going 4ward IF Carmelo stays here----9 man fast. Ive even reconsidered on Tyson for now--you still need a 5 man and there is just none of them. If we play a 4-1 --lets look to improve and plays this way. BIG mistake--changing this style. WE needed to enhance it--we did with THJR --also keep Tyler. I think with two seasons he'll be very good.

RIP Crushalot😞
« Reply To Topic
With Bargs out--Id go to a smaller faster line up 9 man
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy