H1AND1 wrote:tkf wrote:NardDogNation wrote:Dagger wrote:But I thought Griffin was so good he doesn't need cp3! Hogwash, just as I said, this overrated dunker will be exposed now that cp3 is out. Without the best pg in the league feeding this dude he's a good player at best, not a star. I do not want this dude on the Knicks, talk about one-dimensional!
You know what's really comical to me? Blake Griffin, according to the Melo-haters, is suppose to be this multi-dimensional player that affects the game in so many different ways. Taking points out of the equation, Blake Griffin averages 11rpg, 3apg, 1spg and 0.7bpg in 37mpg. Meanwhile Melo averages 9rpg, 2.8apg, 1spg and 0.7bpg in 39.3mpg. When you ponder all of that, bare in mind that Melo gives up 20lbs, 2 inches and otherworldly leaping ability to Blake. Evidently these huge physical advantages can only create a 2rpg, 0.2apg difference between both players and evidently that is the difference between being a Renaissance Man (Griffin) and one-dimensional (Melo). You gotta love irrational hate and bias sometimes, lol.
This is just pathetic.. you resort to attacking blake Griffin to defend this bum carmelo... I don't know why? the clippers don't want anything to do with melo.. Blake is a great player.. Blake not only has better numbers but he is not even close to reaching his prime.. If you are pissed that people are bashing carmelo, bashing blake does not make it go away...
tkf: Let me preface this by saying that my opinion on Melo's basketball abilities aligns much closer to posters like you, Bonn, guns, dk7th, etc. I don't necessarily hate the guy personally but am not a fan of his game and think volume scoring is vastly overrated.
However, I would honestly be interested in your thoughts (or any other posters for that matter who is versed in advanced metrics)on the numbers NardDog posted comparing Blake to Carmelo. I am HORRIBLE at math, stats, all that stuff in general but I have faith in those basketball stats gurus like Morey, etc who do understand and evaluate this stuff and generally agree with their opinions.
Basically, if someone on here who is a stats person could address the numbers NardDog posted to compare the two id like to see a statistically based rebuttal instead of "don't bash Blake to defend Carmelo". I know for one you could say Blake is much younger and can improve. But what else? Honest question.
I also agree with GustavBahler that most fans wouldn't mind seeing Melo be traded if we got something halfway decent in return. Love him or hate him, signing one dimensional players on the wrong side of 30 to 120+ mil contracts isn't smart. Allan Houston, AHEM, cough, Allan Houston.
Yellowboy has some good numbers too but I would point a few things out:
A) From the beginning, it's a bad idea to base an analysis of two players on only 40% of one season.
B) Melo's and Blake's #s are closer this year than career-wise. This year, there probably isn't much of a difference between the two.
C) Career-wise, Blake is the more efficient scorer, better rebounder, and better passer.
D) Blake is younger and probably going to also be paid less in future years than Melo.
E) I wouldn't pursue Blake at his contract size but he's a good enough player that I'd be excited to have him.