[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

When we won 12 games in a row late last year
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/9/2013  8:35 PM
Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/9/2013  9:41 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

Vastly overrated player. But on the Knicks he is the best they got.

anrst
Posts: 22707
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/7/2005
Member: #1054
USA
12/9/2013  9:43 PM
lol
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/9/2013  9:44 PM
When train went of rails it is... well... train wreck...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
SwishAndDish13
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/2/2013
Member: #5700

12/9/2013  10:13 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

So true. Chandler is a nice player but they can live without him. He is overpaid and injury prone. New Orleans had to blow the whole thing up bc of him. People who think we will be vastly improved when he comes back are delusional. He's not gonna do anything about nobody other than Melo or Bangs making a shot. He definitely isn't gonna help the backcourt defense. People talk about our weak side help and all this crap but our PG shouldn't be getting beat off the dribble every time down the floor. You can't be competitive or play defense when that happens.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/9/2013  10:18 PM
I think the felton, prigs lineup helped a lot. Not sure why that hasn't been revisited.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
12/9/2013  10:26 PM
CrushAlot wrote:I think the felton, prigs lineup helped a lot. Not sure why that hasn't been revisited.

Because our coach is a mental midget.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
12/11/2013  10:07 AM
What about the time we won 13 games in a row last season? Did Tyson have anything to do with that?

And if he didn't, did Felton play with a bad hammy and was Prigs a year older?

A better question would be how did we stop the opposing PG during that stretch, and how could we duplicate that now?

I hate Uncle Drew...

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/11/2013  10:13 AM
Vmart wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

Vastly overrated player. But on the Knicks he is the best they got.

thats sad, but true..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/11/2013  10:39 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/11/2013  10:41 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

If K-Mart gives you big #s, Melo plays the best ball of his career, and you're in a very weak conference, you can win 9 games with one of your all-stars being out.
It's odd but not surprising that Chandler is valued so much more around the league than by Knicks fans. I guess Tyson doesn't do enough flashy inefficient scoring.
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/11/2013  10:40 AM
MSG3 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I think the felton, prigs lineup helped a lot. Not sure why that hasn't been revisited.

Because our coach is a mental midget.

It's amazing he hasn't done what worked so well last year.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/11/2013  10:48 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

If K-Mart gives you big #s, Melo plays the best ball of his career, and you're in a very weak conference, you can win 9 games with one of your all-stars being out.
It's odd but not surprising that Chandler is valued so much more around the league than by Knicks fans. I guess Tyson doesn't do enough flashy inefficient scoring.

Chandler only has value for a team that is completely set at the other 4 positions as you can see the knicks are only set at one position. Dallas was set at all the other positions hence a Championship. OKC can use that blue print with Chandler.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/11/2013  10:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/11/2013  10:57 AM
Vmart wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

If K-Mart gives you big #s, Melo plays the best ball of his career, and you're in a very weak conference, you can win 9 games with one of your all-stars being out.
It's odd but not surprising that Chandler is valued so much more around the league than by Knicks fans. I guess Tyson doesn't do enough flashy inefficient scoring.

Chandler only has value for a team that is completely set at the other 4 positions as you can see the knicks are only set at one position. Dallas was set at all the other positions hence a Championship. OKC can use that blue print with Chandler.


but if he averaged 5 more points a game on 15% lower shooting (putting him at around 15 PPG on 48% shooting), you'd love him, right?
I really thought the crashing of this roster despite having so many volume scorers might change people's views on the importance of volume vs. efficiency.
blkexec
Posts: 28339
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
12/11/2013  11:29 AM
When u have too many volume scorers...your offense will be 90% iso. Can't have melo and other melo wanna bees. But it's hard. If you see melo putting up 30 shots to get 30 puts and receive a max contract....what do you think others will do? That's why it's hard to build around melo and other volume shooters.
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/11/2013  11:32 AM
Knixkik wrote:
MSG3 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I think the felton, prigs lineup helped a lot. Not sure why that hasn't been revisited.

Because our coach is a mental midget.

It's amazing he hasn't done what worked so well last year.

He tried it for 1 game, we lost and he never went back to it. A few days ago he was asked and he said he may reconsider it down the road..smh..he's turning into the biggest idiot in the business

ES
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/11/2013  11:35 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Vmart wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

If K-Mart gives you big #s, Melo plays the best ball of his career, and you're in a very weak conference, you can win 9 games with one of your all-stars being out.
It's odd but not surprising that Chandler is valued so much more around the league than by Knicks fans. I guess Tyson doesn't do enough flashy inefficient scoring.

Chandler only has value for a team that is completely set at the other 4 positions as you can see the knicks are only set at one position. Dallas was set at all the other positions hence a Championship. OKC can use that blue print with Chandler.


but if he averaged 5 more points a game on 15% lower shooting (putting him at around 15 PPG on 48% shooting), you'd love him, right?
I really thought the crashing of this roster despite having so many volume scorers might change people's views on the importance of volume vs. efficiency.

Why should FG suffer to get 5 more points. Instead of tapping out grab rebound go up strong get fouled get the points at the line or get an and one.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/11/2013  11:40 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/11/2013  11:41 AM
Vmart wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Vmart wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Tyson Chandler played in 3 of those games.

If K-Mart gives you big #s, Melo plays the best ball of his career, and you're in a very weak conference, you can win 9 games with one of your all-stars being out.
It's odd but not surprising that Chandler is valued so much more around the league than by Knicks fans. I guess Tyson doesn't do enough flashy inefficient scoring.

Chandler only has value for a team that is completely set at the other 4 positions as you can see the knicks are only set at one position. Dallas was set at all the other positions hence a Championship. OKC can use that blue print with Chandler.


but if he averaged 5 more points a game on 15% lower shooting (putting him at around 15 PPG on 48% shooting), you'd love him, right?
I really thought the crashing of this roster despite having so many volume scorers might change people's views on the importance of volume vs. efficiency.

Why should FG suffer to get 5 more points. Instead of tapping out grab rebound go up strong get fouled get the points at the line or get an and one.


I don't know who FG is but 48% but to put this in some more context: 5 more PPG would put him ahead of David West in points and FG% and would basically mean going 2 for 7 on his additional shot attempts and hitting a free throw. I'm sure other players are making more than 2 of the 7 extra shots they take because of his low volume. I'm sure he could force up 7 more shots a game and hit 2 of them also but that wouldn't help the team.
When we won 12 games in a row late last year

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy