BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178 USA
|
Haha my bad, Marquise Walker was a WR for UMichigan a few years ago, I was just playing Madden so I had his name in my head.
I'd much rather have Okur over Dampier because he can shoot. I bet teams could offer more to Okur too, but the fact is players can MAKE more money in NY through endorsements and marketing, since its the most popular city in the NY and garners the most attention of possibly any city in the world.
Secondly, Okur is absolutely deadly on the pick and roll. I'm sure all Knicks' front office people would have to do is show Okur a highlight tape of Marbury to Doleac/KThomas and let him imagine how well he could do. He averaged 8 points in 22 minutes, KT averaged 11 in 31 minutes. With Marbury off the screen and roll I'd pencil Okur in for at least 15 a night (same height as Doleac with a better outside touch than both Doleac and Thomas). He really wouldn't have to work for his shot, just screen, roll, shoot, 2 points.
He's pretty good on the offensive glass too, was in the top 15 in rebounding per 48 minutes.
Maybe teams will offer him more, but show up on his doorstep at 12:01 AM on Day 1 of FA signing and give him the full thing. I bet he'd sign. He'd be a huge boost to the stagnant offense. I just don't see the Knicks getting Rasheed, don't see the point in Stro Swift (after watching him he's so unpolished and with his lack of motivation, offering a lot of money would be a big gamble), and don't really see anybody else of value in the FA Market who would sign for the MLE.
Dampier is a rebounder and a pretty efficient shotblocker, but I'd say he asks for more $$ and don't see the point of adding a rebounder. Knicks need more offense. Who knows, I'd be happy with either.
I just think its essential to get guys who fit around Marbury, like the Nets did with Kidd and the 76ers did with Iverson in their Finals run. Kidd excelled in full court, so they got athletes to finish off his alleyoops. Iverson was a great defender who was unstoppable in the halfcourt one-on-one, so they surrounded him with guys who played tough defense and gave Iverson a chance to win the game in the 4th (why Larry Brown dismantled that team boggles my mind to this day). Marbury's favorite play is the pick and roll, and he's much better in a slow down, halfcourt offense as opposed to a fast break or transition game. Plus, he had those guys in Phoenix (Stoudemire and Marion) and he never really pushed it, so I assume thats how he likes to play. So get him guys who will hit open shots off the pick and roll (he's done it with Thomas and Doleac very effectively), can work well in a halfcourt, and go from there.
I think KThomas will be traded in the offseason, so get a guy who does his job as well or better (Okur), trade KThomas, and that's how you get better. If the Knicks trade Thomas and wind up without anybody who can run the pick and roll, then that hurts a lot and will impede on progress. Trade KT and the expiring contracts to Chicago for Curry/Crawford and one of their big contracts (I think Chicago would do Curry and Eddie Robinson for Kurt Thomas and Othella Harrington) and go from there, something along those lines. (The hypothetical starting 5 after that type of deal would be Marbury, Houston, TThomas, Okur, and Curry, with FWilliams, Penny, Mohammed rounding out an 8 man rotation. Not bad.)
That's how you improve your team, by strengthening in while not subsequently weakening it.
[Edited by - bigsm00th on 04/27/2004 17:03:17]
#Knickstaps
|