[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

When 100% healthy --- this lineup is Legit
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139
11/14/2013  12:42 PM
Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
11/14/2013  12:44 PM
Maybe if you replace Felton. He kills you on both ends
NYY1NYK2
Posts: 21013
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/16/2010
Member: #3067
11/14/2013  1:02 PM
felton is a scrub
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359
11/14/2013  1:06 PM
This is like saying, "when 100% motivated, they're legit",

yea, the ideal case is always good news, that's true for every team in the league.

The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
11/14/2013  1:34 PM
No. Bargnani is playing better now at the 5. He needs to back up Tyson.

Felton, JR, Shump, Melo, Tyson is the way to go if we're going away from the Felton/Prigs back court.
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784
11/14/2013  1:38 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Maybe if you replace Felton. He kills you on both ends

Felton is the weak link on defense. He's the true definition of "Matador Defense" as everyone flies by him. Bring Shump in as the point guard to defend the position. Much better results.

"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/14/2013  1:47 PM
By legit do you mean Championship worthy or some wins here and there?
Knixkik
Posts: 35603
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
11/14/2013  2:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/14/2013  2:03 PM
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

If that's the case then might as well work to trade shumpert for the best possible PG. Other than the PG position I would agree. I think Felton would make a strong 6th man.
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139
11/14/2013  2:26 PM
Knixkik wrote:
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

If that's the case then might as well work to trade shumpert for the best possible PG. Other than the PG position I would agree. I think Felton would make a strong 6th man.

good point
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139
11/14/2013  2:28 PM
Vmart wrote:By legit do you mean Championship worthy or some wins here and there?

Legit ---meaning a season better than last year ---which would be good until we get K. Love to win the Chip
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/14/2013  2:29 PM
helloharv wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

If that's the case then might as well work to trade shumpert for the best possible PG. Other than the PG position I would agree. I think Felton would make a strong 6th man.

good point

No way Felton takes a demotion. The only way you get anything out of his is to play him a lot. At least then he has his every third good game. Off the bench he gets fat and pouts. Ask Blazer fans
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
LivingLegend
Posts: 26301
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645
11/14/2013  2:30 PM
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

We have awful perimeter players - they are lethargic and dumb defensive players. Our concepts suck on defense and our ball movement on offense is mostly non-existent.

Our leader is the most inefficient so-called super-star in NBA history and may be one of the worst stars to play with when considering how he holds the ball, the bad shots he takes and his on-off effort on the defensive end of the court.

Our team doesn't work -- lots of chemistry issues all over the place.
helloharv
Posts: 20457
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/22/2012
Member: #4139
11/14/2013  2:34 PM
LivingLegend wrote:
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

We have awful perimeter players - they are lethargic and dumb defensive players. Our concepts suck on defense and our ball movement on offense is mostly non-existent.

Our leader is the most inefficient so-called super-star in NBA history and may be one of the worst stars to play with when considering how he holds the ball, the bad shots he takes and his on-off effort on the defensive end of the court.

Our team doesn't work -- lots of chemistry issues all over the place.

It worked last year don't you think?-----and we had a 80% Tyson and we added another scorer that we lacked against the Pacers
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/14/2013  3:17 PM
helloharv wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

We have awful perimeter players - they are lethargic and dumb defensive players. Our concepts suck on defense and our ball movement on offense is mostly non-existent.

Our leader is the most inefficient so-called super-star in NBA history and may be one of the worst stars to play with when considering how he holds the ball, the bad shots he takes and his on-off effort on the defensive end of the court.

Our team doesn't work -- lots of chemistry issues all over the place.

It worked last year don't you think?-----and we had a 80% Tyson and we added another scorer that we lacked against the Pacers

I thought it worked last year because of Kidd and Wallace. They got the Knicks off to a fast start. That leadership is missing and I don't see Melo taking the leadership role and Felton is a backup at best.
Knixkik
Posts: 35603
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
11/14/2013  3:26 PM
fishmike wrote:
helloharv wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
helloharv wrote:Felton
JR
Melo
Bargs
Tyson

Actually have a little of everything --- defense/quickness/3 point shooting/rebounding/fast break/half court sets/2 man game/etc.

If that's the case then might as well work to trade shumpert for the best possible PG. Other than the PG position I would agree. I think Felton would make a strong 6th man.

good point

No way Felton takes a demotion. The only way you get anything out of his is to play him a lot. At least then he has his every third good game. Off the bench he gets fat and pouts. Ask Blazer fans

As a 6th man he can still play 30 mpg between both guard positions. He may not like the demotion but I think he would prefer it over getting traded again.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/14/2013  3:36 PM
Its hard to determine--we have a month or two of checking out Bargs at C. If he can give us 20-10-2 then I would look at moving Chandler for a PG of similar value. We cant allocate 25mm for any one position and I dont think bargs Melo and Chandler is a good fit.
RIP Crushalot😞
MSG3
Posts: 22788
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/2/2009
Member: #2476
USA
11/14/2013  3:39 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Its hard to determine--we have a month or two of checking out Bargs at C. If he can give us 20-10-2 then I would look at moving Chandler for a PG of similar value. We cant allocate 25mm for any one position and I dont think bargs Melo and Chandler is a good fit.

Or let Bargs increase his value and trade him. I'd rather trade Bargs given the choice.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/14/2013  3:43 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Its hard to determine--we have a month or two of checking out Bargs at C. If he can give us 20-10-2 then I would look at moving Chandler for a PG of similar value. We cant allocate 25mm for any one position and I dont think bargs Melo and Chandler is a good fit.

I feel the same way. How about Chandler and Shump for Faried, Gallo and Miller obviously Knicks would have to sweeten the pot as always.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/14/2013  4:28 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Its hard to determine--we have a month or two of checking out Bargs at C. If he can give us 20-10-2 then I would look at moving Chandler for a PG of similar value. We cant allocate 25mm for any one position and I dont think bargs Melo and Chandler is a good fit.
He's a CAA player so I doubt we could pull it off but if Bargs is getting 20/10 we would be utterly idiotic not to trade him.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/14/2013  4:37 PM
Wait... Why would we be trading Bargs if he was avg'ing 20/10? 1st of all I don't think we need to be talking about trading Tyson or Bargs. This fan base is so all over the place. rather than be patient and wait for Bargs to get his bearings we had a group who were convinced he was a bum based on a few shaky early games. Then you have the contingent that doesn't really like Tyson. Both groups are off base. Just let this team keep playing and developing chemistry. Let's see if down the line we can get something from Jeremy Tyler when he gets healthy. I don't think we need to make any trades. We still have Murry who could be developed. We have THJ to develop. We need to stop panicking and let things develop. we've got time before the trade deadline.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
When 100% healthy --- this lineup is Legit
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy