holfresh wrote:4. I don't mind Melo taking the last shot, I think he should, but Woody, could u just run him off a screen, a misdirection, put in Tim Jr., Bargs, 3 pt. shooters to keep the defense honest and out of the lane in case Melo wants to drive or maybe just a quick option to Tim Jr. in the corner, he has been money...Can u show some imagination than just give it to Melo every damn time...Come on man!!!

This is just the thing that burns us OVER AND OVER again with Woodson. You look at the plays a coach like Doc Rivers calls and there's no comparison. You want to see a play that is going to create the BEST and most high % shot you can get and that the play has other options if the defense shuts down option one. We have to put Melo in a better position and having off ball motion and setting a screen for Melo isn't that freakin hard. Melo shoots very well off curl plays. You could run any number of misdirection plays before the ball even gets inbounded to loosen up the defense.

Melonoma wrote:- The non-call that should have sent Felton to the line for three shots with the game tied late.

- Woodson playing Melo-ball late in the 4th after a 10-0 run that saw great team play and ball movement. They settled for a bunch of Melo iso's and he missed most of them. How does it make any sense to settle for inferior shots, especially when Melo is being guarded by a great defender in Deng?

- Melo's last shot. Holy ****, do anything but that.

Dis be da knicks. Who said anything had to make sense? IF we were trying to make sense, Melo would't even be here.