[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Lin or Felton? One year later
Author Thread
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/10/2013  12:11 PM
So this thread isn't intended to start a slanging match on 'who was right'. I'm starting it because it seems like the emotion has gone out of the issue now, so we can have a better debate.I guess I'm just wondering if anyone's view has altered now a full season has passed.

I was a bit gutted at the time, when we decided not to match Lin's offer sheet, but also angry at him. But then I was pleased when we got Felton, but worried about whether he'd be in shape.

Now I'm not really bothered- I think Felton is a better fit for us, and I'm glad we don't have to put up with all the Lin vs Melo stories that there would have been. Also pleased Felton seems to be taking keeping in shape seriously.

Did Lin get over rated or has he been wrongly used in Houston? Would he have been a good fit with this current Knick squad? Must say I remember our offense was lethal with him, and so was the Rockets this year, so I wonder if he deserves a bit more credit for his ability to run an offense.

AUTOADVERT
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
8/10/2013  12:23 PM
I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

8/10/2013  12:28 PM
finally a thread to compete with the bargs is a steal thread. Lin was a better pg last year at a higher price. They both fought through injuries and finished well. Ray had an ok post season and Lin not so much. Who knows what would have happened if Lin stayed and Woody pulled Lin like McHale did. That would have been an amazing sight to see. Also, what kind of hit would Lin have taken this off-season if he got hurt during the Boston series after not playing last year.
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/10/2013  12:37 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:finally a thread to compete with the bargs is a steal thread. Lin was a better pg last year at a higher price. They both fought through injuries and finished well. Ray had an ok post season and Lin not so much. Who knows what would have happened if Lin stayed and Woody pulled Lin like McHale did. That would have been an amazing sight to see. Also, what kind of hit would Lin have taken this off-season if he got hurt during the Boston series after not playing last year.

Ha, just ask Tyson!

smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/10/2013  12:43 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

It would have been nice watching Lin and Shumpert develop as our backcourt over 3 years, but then again with that huge salary in year 3, I doubt we would have kept JR, or taken on Bargs contract (some folks would be see it as win, win, win, though I'm not one of them). What worries me is that Lin seems to always charge at the basket, and end up face down on the floor- he did it with us and continued with it in Houston- he's tough, but I do wonder about injuries- can't keep that up if he wants to last a long time in the league.

Felton is an average PG with less upside, but I like him. He's tougher than Lin, and surprisingly seemed to raise his game in the playoffs (really wasn't expecting that). He's not great at running an offense though. I think Lin improved as the season went on, but would his confidence have survived such a slow start in NY? Not sure it would have...

NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/10/2013  12:46 PM
Lin getting hurt on both years was due to his aggressive play and the other team taking him out. Kidd the year before and Sefolosha last year. I mean these aren't due to a pulled hamstring or groin. These were due to football type hits delivered to Lin. I don't think you can blame him for getting hurt. He times McHale let Lin have the ball, Lin produced. He also actually got a lot better being a stationary shooter in the corners in he last 3 months of the regular season shooting around .400.

I still think Lin would be the better PG here. His pushing the ball up would give Melo at least 6 extra easy buckets per game. I also think Lin is the better on-ball defender. He gets in trouble when there are picks but if the big knows how to play the PnR like Fishlips where you show first then Lin is ok. Lillard is one of few players that took Lin at will to the paint. Westbrook had trouble with Lin due to Lin's speed and length.

Felton just kills me when he misses open players and when he starts chucking perimeter shots. His game management is also suspect at best.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/10/2013  12:49 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

I think Felton is a better fit. Also, Lin's contract in this cba is an albatross. Even with the Rockets getting the average 8 mil a year versus the poison pill deal that the Knicks would have gotten Lin is still overpaid. It will probably cost the Rockets Asik to get out from under his deal.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

8/10/2013  1:51 PM
smackeddog wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

It would have been nice watching Lin and Shumpert develop as our backcourt over 3 years, but then again with that huge salary in year 3, I doubt we would have kept JR, or taken on Bargs contract (some folks would be see it as win, win, win, though I'm not one of them). What worries me is that Lin seems to always charge at the basket, and end up face down on the floor- he did it with us and continued with it in Houston- he's tough, but I do wonder about injuries- can't keep that up if he wants to last a long time in the league.

Felton is an average PG with less upside, but I like him. He's tougher than Lin, and surprisingly seemed to raise his game in the playoffs (really wasn't expecting that). He's not great at running an offense though. I think Lin improved as the season went on, but would his confidence have survived such a slow start in NY? Not sure it would have...

I don't think Lin would have affected any of the deals NY made this year except maybe udrih.

Nalod
Posts: 71312
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/10/2013  1:59 PM
Lin a year later would have been measured by his growth and maturation post "linsanity". that brief time would be hard to repeat and maybe its best he moved on.

Felton had a very good year with much different time team. Rockets got Harden late, Lin was not 100% early on. Felton helped knicks get off to a great start!

If its about developing players then I prefer to have Lin on the roster. Since its not, Im good with Felton.

Good with either player!

earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
8/10/2013  2:41 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

I think Felton is a better fit. Also, Lin's contract in this cba is an albatross. Even with the Rockets getting the average 8 mil a year versus the poison pill deal that the Knicks would have gotten Lin is still overpaid. It will probably cost the Rockets Asik to get out from under his deal.

Seriously, if you like ISO ball, then yes, Felton is a better fit. But, that is a self defeating ideology to have in a team game. But Lin clearly can see the floor better and distribute the ball better and most would say a better defender. Regarding seeing and distributing, remember what he did to a bunch of no names here? Lin is on another level there.
Money can't be weighed into the equation as you are talking about a billionaire. It is like 1000 more bucks over the course of a year to a common man. You feel it a little, but not too bad.

Lin is only overpaid in year 3 and Houston is averaging the deal out over 3 years, at 8 per. So that is reasonable. But we have deep pockets (and couldn't do that as we were over the cap or some reason).

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
8/10/2013  2:55 PM
Rather have neither, both were marginal at best.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/10/2013  3:37 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
earthmansurfer wrote:I think we would be a more dangerous team with Lin. He played well on the stage and you can't overlook that. He was a different player here. In Houston he just isn't the "it" like he was here.

Now, the ball is often in Harden's hands and it is hard to really see what Lin can do. He's had his ups and downs.
But I'll say this, at the end of close games, not having him sucks. We have Melo who is clutch but no one else. I would love to have Lin back as our #2.

Regarding Felton, I like him, I just think he is better suited as a backup on most teams. He does play pretty good for us though, so he isn't a terrible starter.

If we could do it all over again, I'd take Lin and it wouldn't be close. Especially after how things went with Camby, Kidd and Novak. I think it ended up costing us, not saving us anything - which was actually questioned by many people.

I think Felton is a better fit. Also, Lin's contract in this cba is an albatross. Even with the Rockets getting the average 8 mil a year versus the poison pill deal that the Knicks would have gotten Lin is still overpaid. It will probably cost the Rockets Asik to get out from under his deal.

Seriously, if you like ISO ball, then yes, Felton is a better fit. But, that is a self defeating ideology to have in a team game. But Lin clearly can see the floor better and distribute the ball better and most would say a better defender. Regarding seeing and distributing, remember what he did to a bunch of no names here? Lin is on another level there.
Money can't be weighed into the equation as you are talking about a billionaire. It is like 1000 more bucks over the course of a year to a common man. You feel it a little, but not too bad.

Lin is only overpaid in year 3 and Houston is averaging the deal out over 3 years, at 8 per. So that is reasonable. But we have deep pockets (and couldn't do that as we were over the cap or some reason).

If money isn't a factor in his deal do you think Morey keeps Lin? Morey got Lin and Asik because money was a factor. Things changed in Houston with D12 and Harden. I think Houston keeps Asik if they can but 8 mil for Lin in this cba is a lot.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
NYKBocker
Posts: 38419
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/10/2013  4:05 PM
I think with Lin against Indiana we would had a better chance in reaching the finals. His ability to push the ball would have taken Hibbert out of the equation.
blkexec
Posts: 28338
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
8/10/2013  5:49 PM
I can't believe people are still overrating this kid. He's a decent role player that hit the lotto by coming to ny playing for danfoni. Felton is the better player for this team....especially contract wise. Both players have their flaws. Ill take felton right now. A bull dog ready to go to war.
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/10/2013  6:01 PM
knickscity wrote:Rather have neither, both were marginal at best.

Very true. There's so many ridiculous PGs in the league now. Felton and Lin could easily be backups on a lot of teams in the league. You could actually make the argument they are two of the worst point guards in the NBA. That really says more about how good everyone else is.

Are Lin and Felton better then anyone in that bottom group (Vasquez, Chalmers, etc)?

Not very well thought out PG order. Most of these guys are in the right groups at least I think.

Chris Paul
Derrick Rose
Tony Parker

Russell Westbrook
Kyrie Irving
Steph Curry
Deron Williams
Rajon Rondo


Mike Conley
Ty Lawson

John Wall
Jrue Holliday
Steve Nash
Damian Lillard
Jeff Teague
Ricky Rubio
Kyle Lowry
Goran Dragic
Brandon Jennings

Kemba Walker
George Hill
Greivis Vasquez
Jose Calderon
Ray Felton
Jameer Nelson
Jeremy Lin
Brandon Knight
Mario Chalmers

Trey Burke
Michael Carter-Williams

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
8/10/2013  6:03 PM
I will admit that I way overreacted when we let him go.

But it was still stupid for a capped out team to not take advantage of having Lin's Bird Rights. There's 100% chance we've seen the best Raymond Felton will every play. There's a good chance Linsanity was the peak of Lin's career but he's still young.

Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
8/10/2013  6:04 PM
Crush - True. The new CBA changed everything.

NYKBocker - I think Lin would have GREATLY improved our chances. He would have been a great #2 to have. Smart pg that won't just give the ball to JR. Sets up his teamates ,etc.

blkexec - Do you forget what he did here? It was the greatest thing I've witnessed in almost any sport. It was out of this world. Partly cause he loved the stage. Now things are different in Houston. Some people just perform better in NY. (Even Felton does). DAntoni didn't do to well with more in LA, did he? The thing that mattered was that Lin ran the team. Now with Felton it's more of an ISO or whatever Woody wants type of team. We are good, but I think with Lin we were quite a bit better.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
8/10/2013  7:11 PM
The love is still strong, but most people see he isn't a all world prospect the knicks decided to let go. He was easily replaced by felton, that's pretty much the end of the story.

He should hope he keeps his starting in Htown.

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
TheGame
Posts: 26637
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
8/10/2013  8:01 PM
I think Lin would not have disappeared in that Indy series like Felton did, but overall, I thought Felton played well and was at least a wash with what Lin did in Houston. However, when you compare the contracts, it is no competition. We are better off without Lin and his overpriced contract. I think Ben U. may be as good a PG as either of them, and he will really help our depth.
Trust the Process
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/10/2013  8:14 PM
It took Lin some time to work his way back from injury and adjust to a new team. But post all-star break he averaged 15 points on just 11.8 shots and shot 38% from 3 point range. I could see him being a 15/6 player for many years. Beverly is a very good player though and Lin may not get as much playing time.
Lin or Felton? One year later

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy