nixluva wrote:Never liked C. Barkley. Hate the way he stomps all over other peoples lines during broadcast. He's more wrong than right and says too many stupid things. He was wrong about the Knicks in terms of how good they were vs the Nets. It only seems like he was right about the Knicks offense, because Kidd wore down, JR was hurt and Woody refused to play our other shooters, Cope and Novak. Also Woody didn't play Prigs and Shump enough. The Spurs also took a ton of 3's and were a lucky game 6 from winning the title. Barkley just throws out cliches and acts like he's some expert. I love when Kenny Smith clowns him.
he was right about lack of rebounding, jump-shooting dependency, and being pretenders as a result.
so he got it wrong about the nets. BFD he is still a terrific basketball mind. i am also a fan of shaq and smith. add chris webber to that list, who is also terrific. you should listen to webber's color commentary-- just great.
anyway don't we care more about how insightful barkley was about the knicks?
barkley is enjoying himself and he comes across that way to me, and he enjoys clowning and being the butt of jokes. he won an emmy award for his work for what it's worth.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%