[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Tyson Chandler for Eric Gordon...anybody interested?
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/5/2013  6:52 PM
I mentioned this before, but I think the Knicks still need more fire power....

Tyson Chandler sucks but he actually does fit well with Bargnani and Melo on paper...

The pelicans actually need a center and Tyson supposedly is a leader. I think he along with Holiday and Tyreke Evans make them a play off team.

The knicks would have a starting lineup of Bargnani, Melo, Shump and Eric Gordon with whoever at center. A lot of you would want to punch me in the face cuz we have no center, but there are a few guys out there we could pick up to fill in on the cheap. Zaza Pachulia? Sam Dalembert?

Keep in mind that Amare, JR and Raymond would be coming off the bench. That is a stacked lineup. A lot of offensive depth and enough guys still around from last year to still have a competitive defense. A lot for guys that can guard multiple positions.

I can see this team moving the rock and having everyones minutes low and simply blowing teams away....cuz who do you guard? You can always dump it to Melo at the end. Or go small with an all guard lineup. Or go bigger and still have offense out there.

Tyson got exposed in the playoffs and has been regressing even though he had the defensive player of the year award and first team all defense. I think both titles were given because of reputation. The knicks defense got better because Woodson took over. His schemes are really good and guys bought in early. I think Woodson could do it with this group I mentioned.

Anyway, Eric Gordon even though he's injury prone, he is a dynamic offensive threat. Bargs is coming off injuries, Amare, Melo too...we'd be taking a big gamble but the talent would be greatly improved on this team. I maintain that the Knicks could definitely find someone to man the middle for the veterans minimum and split time with Amare at Center.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/5/2013  7:02 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/5/2013  7:03 PM
I'm up for moving Chandler if a good offer is there, but I would rather trade or sign for a big first before moving Tyson. If he was gone and we couldn't find a decent replacement we would be in trouble IMO. Even with his flu spells he is still one of the better defensive big men in the league.

Chandler also played in a strike shortened season, followed by the olympics, then right into last season. Maybe with a full summer off to rehab we'll see less flu Tyson. But like I said, I'm still open to offers.

STATMELO
Posts: 20199
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2011
Member: #3637

7/5/2013  7:05 PM
GustavBahler wrote:I'm up for moving Chandler if a good offer is there, but I would rather trade or sign for a big first before moving Tyson. If he was gone and we couldn't find a decent replacement we would be in trouble IMO. Even with his flu spells he is still one of the better defensive big men in the league.

Chandler also played in a strike shortened season, followed by the olympics, then right into last season. Maybe with a full summer off to rehab we'll see less flu Tyson. But like I said, I'm still open to offers.


Tyson Chandler was actually a terrible defensive big last year, and had a huge statistical regression from his DPOY season.
martin
Posts: 76390
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/5/2013  7:10 PM
Hell no
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
GustavBahler
Posts: 42864
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

7/5/2013  7:12 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/5/2013  7:12 PM
STATMELO wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I'm up for moving Chandler if a good offer is there, but I would rather trade or sign for a big first before moving Tyson. If he was gone and we couldn't find a decent replacement we would be in trouble IMO. Even with his flu spells he is still one of the better defensive big men in the league.

Chandler also played in a strike shortened season, followed by the olympics, then right into last season. Maybe with a full summer off to rehab we'll see less flu Tyson. But like I said, I'm still open to offers.


Tyson Chandler was actually a terrible defensive big last year, and had a huge statistical regression from his DPOY season.

I agree that he regressed last season but he is still one of the better big men on D when he's healthy. Still doesn't excuse some of his performances however. Like I said, I don't mind trading him but lets see who his replacement is first before shipping him out, or just trade him for another big and some complimentary pieces to make the deal work.

martin
Posts: 76390
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/5/2013  7:12 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
STATMELO wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I'm up for moving Chandler if a good offer is there, but I would rather trade or sign for a big first before moving Tyson. If he was gone and we couldn't find a decent replacement we would be in trouble IMO. Even with his flu spells he is still one of the better defensive big men in the league.

Chandler also played in a strike shortened season, followed by the olympics, then right into last season. Maybe with a full summer off to rehab we'll see less flu Tyson. But like I said, I'm still open to offers.


Tyson Chandler was actually a terrible defensive big last year, and had a huge statistical regression from his DPOY season.

I agree that he regressed last season but he is still one of the better big men on D when he's healthy. Still doesn't excuse some of his performances however. Like I said, I don't mind trading him but lets see who is replacement is first before shipping him out, or just trade him for another big and some complimentary pieces to make the deal work.

same

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/5/2013  8:07 PM
martin wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
STATMELO wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:I'm up for moving Chandler if a good offer is there, but I would rather trade or sign for a big first before moving Tyson. If he was gone and we couldn't find a decent replacement we would be in trouble IMO. Even with his flu spells he is still one of the better defensive big men in the league.

Chandler also played in a strike shortened season, followed by the olympics, then right into last season. Maybe with a full summer off to rehab we'll see less flu Tyson. But like I said, I'm still open to offers.


Tyson Chandler was actually a terrible defensive big last year, and had a huge statistical regression from his DPOY season.

I agree that he regressed last season but he is still one of the better big men on D when he's healthy. Still doesn't excuse some of his performances however. Like I said, I don't mind trading him but lets see who is replacement is first before shipping him out, or just trade him for another big and some complimentary pieces to make the deal work.

same

Tyrus Thomas, Elton Brand, Kmart, Sam Dalebert, Zaza Pauchila, Brendan Haywood, Jerome Jordan? Allanfan?

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Tyson Chandler for Eric Gordon...anybody interested?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy