Posted by diderotn:
I disagree with those of you who think that Demarr can't be a starter. What has Anderson given us so far? He is not as good of a defender that everyone claim that he is. I have watched many games, and I am not impressed at all with his defense. At least we know this much about Demarr, he can score; and that is an asset that we are lacking now that Houston is not on the roster. All year we haven't played any defense, what makes you think that we will be doing that now? I would much rather have the intangibles that Demarr can offer over what Anderson can. NOw that is me talking.
Just as there is an intensity level difference between high school and college ball, college ball and the NBA, there is a HUGE jump between the NBA regular season and the playoffs. And we're are not even talking about the difference between playing against second line scrubs and starters.
Anderson has a ton of faults. He also has a ton of experience and that counts down the stretch, but it does not discount a younger inexperienced player from stepping up either. Can DerMarr bring it? Has the coach seen the fire in his play during practice? Can he be counted on? How does he shoot under pressure? Have we even seen that of DerMarr.
Defense is not only about giving your man a fit on the defensive end. It's about rotations, it's about help, it's about knowing how to play the pick-and-roll, how to get around picks, getting back on D after a missed shot, going after rebounds, diving after loose balls, blocking out after freethrows are shot, and so forth. Only the Knicks players and coaches can really qualify all of those attributes with Anderson and DerMarr. After you have noted all of the above, get back to me.