[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Woodyball not really working for Knicks
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/20/2013  10:50 PM
After watching this team under Woodson for a full season it's clearer now that the fears I had about his offensive skills were well founded. He's just not doing what he needs to be doing to help put this team over the top. Reading comments from the players it reaffirms my observations.

Shumpert reflected on where the team ran into trouble, saying the offense needs to be adjusted next season.

"We need some more continuity as far as running something that everybody knows we're in it -- just something with more pace," he said. "We have a lot of dead possessions where we don't really have any cohesiveness. We're just sort of out there and it becomes watching whoever has the ball."

I can't agree more and it's a common theme from every observer that has commented on the Knicks offense. They had their moments when the ball and player movement was good, but overall it's nothing like the precision offense you see with a team like the Spurs. That should be the kind of smart and efficient offense this team plays. Woody has to take responsibility for that.

Woody often seems to display poor instincts offensively. Guys will be hot and then he'll take them out or he'll go too long with a player that isn't giving us anything. He'll give up on a guy like Novak rather than design plays that will give Novak a chance to get off good shots. Most teams with a gunner like him will specifically run sets that will create space for their best 3pt shooter. We used to have those sets for Novak, but they have barely been used by Woody. What's the point of having your coaching staff keep stats if you're going to ignore the best statistical shooters you have on your team? How do you not know that Prigs is a plus player and that Cope is one of your top FG% scorers?

Many of us were worried about this guy getting simplistic in the playoffs and that's EXACTLY what happened. Hope that Grunwald talked to Woody about that in his exit interview.

AUTOADVERT
IronWillGiroud
Posts: 25207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2012
Member: #4359

5/20/2013  10:53 PM
yea, you gotta run something,

this was brutal post season to watch and the pacers series was uglier than any series in the history of nba within last 18 years

The Will, check out the Official Home of Will's GameDay Art: http://tinyurl.com/thewillgameday
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/20/2013  11:01 PM
I thought you said Woodson was running D'Antoni's system.
NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
5/20/2013  11:01 PM
Our offense is at its best with shooters on the floor. Woody ignored Novak and didn't use Copeland till it was too late. And the mistakes were compounded by JR not shooting well- the offense doesn't go without the outside shooting.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
5/20/2013  11:06 PM
AnubisADL wrote:I thought you said Woodson was running D'Antoni's system.

+1.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/20/2013  11:43 PM
Woodsons regular season record with the Knicks is very very good. He cant help that the players we acquired one by one either was not available or shot
RIP Crushalot😞
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
5/21/2013  12:24 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/21/2013  12:25 AM
He's not running D'Antoni's system. I'm not sure we have a system on offense. I agree with Nixluva. The system seems to be pass the ball to Melo or Smith in an iso and hold until the shot clock is less than 5, then chuck. And then we run some pick and rolls and screen and rolls. That seems to be it. I think it works because Carmelo is one of the top scorers or our generation, but it's not maximizing the rest of the talent on the court. We have some good players, but with no ball movement (lowest assists in the league, most isos), we aren't maximizing that. I realized now, that's part of why we have the deceptively low stat in the turnovers category. It's hard to get too many turnovers when you aren't making that many passes, I suppose.

When things have gone well we had ball movement. That was about 40 games out of the 94 games we played this season in two stretches.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
5/21/2013  1:05 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/21/2013  1:38 AM
nixluva wrote:After watching this team under Woodson for a full season it's clearer now that the fears I had about his offensive skills were well founded. He's just not doing what he needs to be doing to help put this team over the top. Reading comments from the players it reaffirms my observations.

Shumpert reflected on where the team ran into trouble, saying the offense needs to be adjusted next season.

"We need some more continuity as far as running something that everybody knows we're in it -- just something with more pace," he said. "We have a lot of dead possessions where we don't really have any cohesiveness. We're just sort of out there and it becomes watching whoever has the ball."

I can't agree more and it's a common theme from every observer that has commented on the Knicks offense. They had their moments when the ball and player movement was good, but overall it's nothing like the precision offense you see with a team like the Spurs. That should be the kind of smart and efficient offense this team plays. Woody has to take responsibility for that.

Woody often seems to display poor instincts offensively. Guys will be hot and then he'll take them out or he'll go too long with a player that isn't giving us anything. He'll give up on a guy like Novak rather than design plays that will give Novak a chance to get off good shots. Most teams with a gunner like him will specifically run sets that will create space for their best 3pt shooter. We used to have those sets for Novak, but they have barely been used by Woody. What's the point of having your coaching staff keep stats if you're going to ignore the best statistical shooters you have on your team? How do you not know that Prigs is a plus player and that Cope is one of your top FG% scorers?

Many of us were worried about this guy getting simplistic in the playoffs and that's EXACTLY what happened. Hope that Grunwald talked to Woody about that in his exit interview.

Shump is absolutely on the button, mean while, Melo is satisfied with the teams accomplishments and the baby steps we have taken, Here's a guy who's been in the DAMN LEAGUE FOR 10 YRS, taking about baby steps and correcting little things..WILL SOMEBODY SMACK THIS DUDE AND WAKE HIM UP..

who can run an offense with this dude, remember when he got here AMRARE Had to beg the dude to stick to the game plan, were on a losing streak and all melo could say was "MAN WE JUST NEED TO PLAY BASKETBALL and not worried about anything else" Translation "MAN I DONT NEED NO PLAYS JUST GIVE ME THE BALL AND IM A SCORE"

YOU know why we led the league in the fewest turnovers, because we led the league in fewest assist
One guy gets the ball, one guy shoots the ball.

YOU know we get out rebounded damn near every night, One guy gets the ball, and everybody clears to one side of the court while melo or jr as the other side, nobody is in position to rebound, balls sailing over their heads, late boxing out cause your guards have switched on a big and your bigs are guarding the smalls

I would like someone to point out one, just good one thing that woodson has done in the playoffs since his been here, something that makes me think other wise, because right now, he's scratching ball head thinking WTF am i doing? Jumping shooting offense with a few screens..he's the one that needs some offseason training with some elite coaches

Why isn't no one ranting about woodson hiring some kind of a offensive coach like they were ranting about MDA hiring a defensive coach..

ES
JamesKPolk
Posts: 21204
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/15/2012
Member: #4093

5/21/2013  1:50 AM
AnubisADL wrote:I thought you said Woodson was running D'Antoni's system.

If isolation is D'Antoni's system then people don't know basketball.

"Peace, plenty, and contentment reign throughout our borders, and our beloved country presents a sublime moral spectacle to the world." - James K Polk
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/21/2013  2:27 AM
JamesKPolk wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:I thought you said Woodson was running D'Antoni's system.

If isolation is D'Antoni's system then people don't know basketball.

AnubisADL and CrushAlot are of course remembering that I did point out when Woody was running a lot of MDA's style BB early in the season and I might add that that style of play was when this team was most successful this year. Of course he didn't really run MDA's system in full as it's got over a 100 plays and multiple variations of those same plays and none of them are ISO plays. Any ISO that happens comes as a matter of last resort as it should since it's some of the least efficient BB there is.

Shump was making the point that when they got into the ISO stuff everything stopped. This is pretty much what Karl and MDA were not happy with but what Woody went out of his way to put back in after MDA left. Basically those "ME" plays are to make Melo and JR happy. NO ONE else on the team really wants to play that way. The main reason is what the hell are the rest of the players supposed to do while Melo or JR hold the ball for 10-15 seconds before they actually decide to make a move? Sure they can score like that and it all seems good when they do, but in the end you can't win that way. By that I mean win in the Playoffs.

Also just so we get it straight, going one on one is not the same as ISO Ball. You can have a player take his man off the dribble or a post up and have that be part of the flow of the offense. That's not what we're complaining about when it comes to Melo or JR. ISO Ball is much more exaggerated one on one. The ball stops, all player movement stops and his teammates move away if possible to not get in his way. Usually when it's done by Melo or JR it comes at the expense of breaking the play. It's not part of the flow of the offense. There are times at the end of a qtr when you call a clearout, which is fine, but that's not what we're talking about or what Shump, Prigs or Tyson was complaining about. If you watch how teams like SA, MIA, MEM and GS play it's all about ball and player movement and the ball not sticking. They play TEAM BALL, which is really all we're asking for.

playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

5/21/2013  5:42 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/21/2013  5:44 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Woodsons regular season record with the Knicks is very very good. He cant help that the players we acquired one by one either was not available or shot

Woodson had enough shooters to keep the Indiana defense busy, but they sat glued to the bench when needed. We weren't going to beat the Pacers with only defense, our team wasn't built that way.

Tone Loc played the funnies when it came to giving the Pacers the knockout punch.
When do you insert a player to score he knocks down a 3 pointer and 30 sec later you take him out, what made you do that ? STRANGE

JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
5/21/2013  6:14 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/21/2013  6:14 AM
Say what?

AnubisADL wrote:I thought you said Woodson was running D'Antoni's system.

Mike Woodson only runs Mike D'Antoni's system when the Knicks win.

One full season an the mutiny is in full force.

Cool.

once a knick always a knick
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/21/2013  7:50 AM
Woodson is next in line for blame over a roster which simply lacks talent. Don, Lenny, Herb, Isiah, Larry, Mike and Mike... what do they all have in common?

Its a talent issue. Always has been (shrug)

Nice to see the folks turn on Woody after we ejected the real problem with this team which was Mike Damphoney.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

5/21/2013  8:23 AM
do people realize the Knicks actually ran less iso against the pacers than in the regular season? There still is a stagnation problem. If they iso or post they need players to move on the weakside. their need to be plays out of the iso's and post ups. This is a team wide problem. Which shump contributes to. How many dumb shots did he force up in isolation. Especially, Melo and Jr too. The offense will be tweaked.
Jmpasq
Posts: 25243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/10/2012
Member: #4182

5/21/2013  8:33 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
nixluva wrote:After watching this team under Woodson for a full season it's clearer now that the fears I had about his offensive skills were well founded. He's just not doing what he needs to be doing to help put this team over the top. Reading comments from the players it reaffirms my observations.

Shumpert reflected on where the team ran into trouble, saying the offense needs to be adjusted next season.

"We need some more continuity as far as running something that everybody knows we're in it -- just something with more pace," he said. "We have a lot of dead possessions where we don't really have any cohesiveness. We're just sort of out there and it becomes watching whoever has the ball."

I can't agree more and it's a common theme from every observer that has commented on the Knicks offense. They had their moments when the ball and player movement was good, but overall it's nothing like the precision offense you see with a team like the Spurs. That should be the kind of smart and efficient offense this team plays. Woody has to take responsibility for that.

Woody often seems to display poor instincts offensively. Guys will be hot and then he'll take them out or he'll go too long with a player that isn't giving us anything. He'll give up on a guy like Novak rather than design plays that will give Novak a chance to get off good shots. Most teams with a gunner like him will specifically run sets that will create space for their best 3pt shooter. We used to have those sets for Novak, but they have barely been used by Woody. What's the point of having your coaching staff keep stats if you're going to ignore the best statistical shooters you have on your team? How do you not know that Prigs is a plus player and that Cope is one of your top FG% scorers?

Many of us were worried about this guy getting simplistic in the playoffs and that's EXACTLY what happened. Hope that Grunwald talked to Woody about that in his exit interview.

Shump is absolutely on the button, mean while, Melo is satisfied with the teams accomplishments and the baby steps we have taken, Here's a guy who's been in the DAMN LEAGUE FOR 10 YRS, taking about baby steps and correcting little things..WILL SOMEBODY SMACK THIS DUDE AND WAKE HIM UP..

who can run an offense with this dude, remember when he got here AMRARE Had to beg the dude to stick to the game plan, were on a losing streak and all melo could say was "MAN WE JUST NEED TO PLAY BASKETBALL and not worried about anything else" Translation "MAN I DONT NEED NO PLAYS JUST GIVE ME THE BALL AND IM A SCORE"

YOU know why we led the league in the fewest turnovers, because we led the league in fewest assist
One guy gets the ball, one guy shoots the ball.

YOU know we get out rebounded damn near every night, One guy gets the ball, and everybody clears to one side of the court while melo or jr as the other side, nobody is in position to rebound, balls sailing over their heads, late boxing out cause your guards have switched on a big and your bigs are guarding the smalls

I would like someone to point out one, just good one thing that woodson has done in the playoffs since his been here, something that makes me think other wise, because right now, he's scratching ball head thinking WTF am i doing? Jumping shooting offense with a few screens..he's the one that needs some offseason training with some elite coaches

Why isn't no one ranting about woodson hiring some kind of a offensive coach like they were ranting about MDA hiring a defensive coach..

The Minutes to Jason Kidd and Jr Smith when he obviously didnt have it was the most frustrating part of the series. Why there were ever minutes being played without Felton or Prigs on the floor I cant understand.

Check out My NFL Draft Prospect Videos at Youtube User Pages Jmpasq,JPdraftjedi,Jmpasqdraftjedi. www.Draftbreakdown.com
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/21/2013  9:01 AM
working better than

Woody has to improve and the offense needs to evolve into more than jumpshots. But I'll take a flawed coach biased towards defense than a flawed coach biased towards offense any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
5/21/2013  9:34 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:working better than

Woody has to improve and the offense needs to evolve into more than jumpshots. But I'll take a flawed coach biased towards defense than a flawed coach biased towards offense any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

What difference does it make you need both, especially in the playoffs..

IMO when you lack in other areas of the game, you have to pretty damn good in other areas

A bad rebounding team should shoot at a high %- not rely on jumpers

A slow pace team should be the more efficient- not with melo

a small team should be really fast- were small and slow

and a bad offensive team should be the best defensive team- a team that out works every opponent

ES
Red1976
Posts: 20206
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2013
Member: #4510

5/21/2013  10:22 AM
I would say Mike D'Antoni didn't work at all for the Knicks, concerning Mike Woodson I think the jury is still out ... after one year and 2 months he has reached 60% of the wins that D'Antoni took 3 full year and 3/4 of a year to achieve and has 7 more playoffs wins (D'Antoni has 0) ....

the author of this topic was still willing to give D'Antoni more time after these almost 4 seasons .... this is not to say that Woodson doesn't have to improve as the players do ... but a bit of balanced judgment would be nice

Red1976
Posts: 20206
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2013
Member: #4510

5/21/2013  10:24 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:working better than

Woody has to improve and the offense needs to evolve into more than jumpshots. But I'll take a flawed coach biased towards defense than a flawed coach biased towards offense any day of the week and twice on Sundays.

What difference does it make you need both, especially in the playoffs..

IMO when you lack in other areas of the game, you have to pretty damn good in other areas

A bad rebounding team should shoot at a high %- not rely on jumpers

A slow pace team should be the more efficient- not with melo

a small team should be really fast- were small and slow

and a bad offensive team should be the best defensive team- a team that out works every opponent

the difference is a losing record for D'Antoni and no playoffs win
versus a division title and a 2nd round playoffs appearance

still room to improve of course but for me the difference is glaring !

AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
5/21/2013  10:36 AM
Woodyball is NOT the problem.

Wooodyball just hides the fact we have mediocre PG play from Felton, suspect perimeter defense, and no offense in the post.

The Knicks are a jump shooting team. The person who is the best jump shooter is Melo.

Woodson is about getting RESULTS. He isn't committed to a particular style of play on the offensive end.

NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
Woodyball not really working for Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy