Just imagine what equipment you would need to pick both of them up!

Badda - Bing!

NardDogNation wrote:

tj23 wrote:What's with the obsession of getting ex-knicks back? Just curious. Harrelson was a good defender but he'd be getting murdered on the boards in this series not to mention he had zero offensive game. An occasional shot followed by an airball.

I actually thought he was a good rebounder and that his shooting game was coming along. I personally thought his career arc would be this season's version of Rasheed Wallace although I believe that most would disagree. I suppose it all comes down to a matter of perspective. I also think that Jerome Jordan is athletic enough and focused enough to score with his back to the basket that he'll eventually emerge into a viable rotation player.

VCoug wrote:Want nothing to do with Kaman, not a fan of his at all.

We need more injury prone front court players!

tj23 wrote:

NardDogNation wrote:

tj23 wrote:What's with the obsession of getting ex-knicks back? Just curious. Harrelson was a good defender but he'd be getting murdered on the boards in this series not to mention he had zero offensive game. An occasional shot followed by an airball.

I actually thought he was a good rebounder and that his shooting game was coming along. I personally thought his career arc would be this season's version of Rasheed Wallace although I believe that most would disagree. I suppose it all comes down to a matter of perspective. I also think that Jerome Jordan is athletic enough and focused enough to score with his back to the basket that he'll eventually emerge into a viable rotation player.

He is young, has limited upside, but could develop. I thought he was smart, boxed out well, but I don't think he had enough explosion to the ball. I just think we can do better but I don't hate the idea of bringing him back.

I don't think he was anything remarkable but when you've got a team that can contend, the guys willing to shirk individual glory are the ones that mean a great deal to the teams success. Harrellson is not going to take any shots he's not suppose to take and will do the dirty things necessary to win and make other guys look good. At worst,he becomes a liability in some respective of the game and remains a 3rd string player. At best, he works his way into an end of the rotation player and does some of the same things that made Sheed a nice player for this team (assuming his jump shot becomes more consistent).

Knixkik wrote:

callmened wrote:i dont want Kaman here (cant play def) and how would we get him anyways? no one wants cambys contract

Camby is an expiring contract next season. He is very tradeable.

Yes....tradable for junk. Teams aren't that willing to dump quality players for expirings.

Andrew wrote:

Knixkik wrote:

callmened wrote:i dont want Kaman here (cant play def) and how would we get him anyways? no one wants cambys contract

Camby is an expiring contract next season. He is very tradeable.

Yes....tradable for junk. Teams aren't that willing to dump quality players for expirings.

One team's junk is another's treasure. Teams will give good players if they are trying to accomplish something like rebuild. For example, you can see a team like phx trading qualities players like Dudley, Frye, and Brown to save some money. Camby plus cash can net us a very good player somewhere.