playa2 wrote:They have to be 100% behind a head coach for the players to buy into what he's selling. Red Holzman, Pat Riley and Jeff Vandummy were coaches the ownership backed and that's when the team was very successful.
Whenever coach and management don't believe the same thing we suffer as Knicks fans.
Isiah was personal friends with Dolomite, that time really doesn't count!
By looking around the association this is what I see in the league.
When management backs the headcoach players are moved not coaches.
So does the Knicks brass have Mike Woodson's back ?
It's the only way knicks players CONSISTENTLY buy in.
woodson has to get out of the second round, something he has not done ever. his history in the second round is very bad and the second round is the beginning of the real season. getting to the ECF would show his growth as a coach, one who has command over his players and gets them to play the right way instead of reverting to bad habits, especially carmelo anthony. one who can properly strategize game over game, one who will not allow his team to quit so that there are no blowouts.
the knicks were not properly prepared in game 1, and losing home court is just terrible. how can you not prepare for the 3-point line defense and rim defense when this is what the pacers are known for? this does not bode well.
lets hope woodson makes it to the ECF.
addendum edit:
meantime here is a quote from woodson that is symptomatic: “They’ve got to try to take better shots sometimes,” Woodson said of Anthony and Smith. “Sometimes, some of the difficult shots that you’ve been accustomed to making, that you’re not making, you’ve got to figure out a way to get better shots. I think they’re capable of doing that. Only time will tell.”
maybe this is just coach-speak but it reads like weak sauce.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%