Shane Larkin PG
| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Caseloads
Posts: 27725 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/29/2001 Member: #41 |
5/2/2013 12:58 PM
agreed. can we get him?
|
|
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851 Alba Posts: 11 Joined: 1/3/2012 Member: #3806 USA |
5/2/2013 12:58 PM
Can we scoop up Patrick Beverley(Jeremy Lin's upgrade) on the cheap somehow?
I would love to team him and Felton up next year in the backcourt. Dude's only 24 with room to improve. |
|
callmened
Posts: 24448 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/26/2012 Member: #4234 |
5/2/2013 1:33 PM
@Briggs..im a big fan of larkin. He might fall down to us cuz hes not a lottery pic
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
|
|
callmened
Posts: 24448 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/26/2012 Member: #4234 |
5/2/2013 1:34 PM
Id love to get beverly...hes exactly what we need. But we dont hv money to afford him
Knicks should be improved: win about 40 games and maybe sneak into the playoffs. Melo, Rose and even Noah will have some nice moments however this team should be about PORZINGUS. the sooner they make him the primary player, the better
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39933 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
5/2/2013 2:36 PM
callmened wrote:@Briggs..im a big fan of larkin. He might fall down to us cuz hes not a lottery pic Yeah, I wouldn't mind drafting Larkin. There are other point guard I'd rather have, but Larkin would be a solid pick ate where we are drafting. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
5/2/2013 2:44 PM
I don't think Larkin will be there when the Knicks pick. Besides Woodson would never play him he loves vets and so does Grunwald.
|
Shane Larkin PG