StarksEwing1 wrote:

jazz74 wrote:i am disgusted with the past few games save the san antonio game. however, the schedule was harder and melo was suspended and we dealt with injuries. the games for the next two weeks, though, are what will seperate us from the rest of the pack (hopefully). very winnable games. we cant let lesser teams beat us like last year. plus with shump coming back to help with or perimeter defense which has been weak all year we can do well.

there is no such thing as winnable the way the knicks are playing. Even the spurs game we caught them at the right time because they played like 4 games in 5 nights. i wnat to see the november knicks because they played smart and played good defense

very true but if they want to win the division they have to win games agaisnt temas they think they are better than. they cant lose against charlotte, new orleans, etc. and think it is fine. i hope these three games are a wake up call.

Vmart wrote:

MSG3 wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's a lazy assessment. I guess the Bulls only won tonight because we've had 2 in a row.

Knicks have dealt with some issues. I'm not an apologist and I hate excuses, but we're in a rut caused partially by injuries. And we've had a tougher schedule lately. Add to that we're trying to mix STAT in and all of a sudden JR and everyone else are in shooting slumps.

We will be fine. Stay afloat until Felton is healthy. When we have a lineup of Felton, Kidd, Shump, Melo and Tyson out there our defense will be just fine and our offense will be back. We've lost 3 in a row. These things happen over the course of a long season. I'm pissed also, but we'll be fine.

When are you going to realize that injuries are a part of this team. It is expected that the knicks are going to have injuries. No team gets through the year njury free. At least some good news Shump going to play with Erie Bayhawks when Knicks go to London.

I realize that. I don't think Felton was expected to be injured, but having old backups seems like a miscalculation at this point. However, it is what it is. The PG is very important and we're struggling without him right now. All good teams go through struggles. I think we'll be fine.

Vmart wrote:

MSG3 wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's a lazy assessment. I guess the Bulls only won tonight because we've had 2 in a row.

Knicks have dealt with some issues. I'm not an apologist and I hate excuses, but we're in a rut caused partially by injuries. And we've had a tougher schedule lately. Add to that we're trying to mix STAT in and all of a sudden JR and everyone else are in shooting slumps.

We will be fine. Stay afloat until Felton is healthy. When we have a lineup of Felton, Kidd, Shump, Melo and Tyson out there our defense will be just fine and our offense will be back. We've lost 3 in a row. These things happen over the course of a long season. I'm pissed also, but we'll be fine.

When are you going to realize that injuries are a part of this team. It is expected that the knicks are going to have injuries. No team gets through the year njury free. At least some good news Shump going to play with Erie Bayhawks when Knicks go to London.

Tough schedules are a feature for all teams, but that didnt stop you from inserting that into your explanation for why the knicks beat the Spurs (what was the spurs excuse the first time, btw?). Dont expect to be taken seriously until you manage your obvious bias --- whatever it is, exactly.

sebstar wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's what I said, then The People called me a lunatic,

But it was an aberration, specifically the margin of victory, not so much the victory it self. I think we're good enough to beat the Spurs on any day, but to blow them out of the water, that won't happen again, and we'll have to play much better to bang

how the hell was it an aberration when we beat them twice? Do you guys know what that word means?

Yea, like "sebstar's face is an aberration"

smackeddog wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's what I said, then The People called me a lunatic,

But it was an aberration, specifically the margin of victory, not so much the victory it self. I think we're good enough to beat the Spurs on any day, but to blow them out of the water, that won't happen again, and we'll have to play much better to bang

So, again, Knicks win/do well= fluke, Knicks lose/do badly= truth.

Great reasoning!

No one said today is truth and yesterday is fluke,

At the same time, the hype around the last Spurs win wasn't justified, just like the doom and gloom isn't really justified today,

As a knicks fan, I'm praying to the universe that we get hot in April and ride into the playoffs with balls of fire

jrodmc wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

sebstar wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's what I said, then The People called me a lunatic,

But it was an aberration, specifically the margin of victory, not so much the victory it self. I think we're good enough to beat the Spurs on any day, but to blow them out of the water, that won't happen again, and we'll have to play much better to bang

how the hell was it an aberration when we beat them twice? Do you guys know what that word means?

Yea, like "sebstar's face is an aberration"

Now that's some brilliant argumentation.

Please, bring me some more of that for how we beat the Heat twice.

AND 1 time we beat them without Melo playing.Figure that out SMFH LOL HATERS GONNA HATE

cooch2584 wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

sebstar wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Vmart wrote:That SA game was an aberration. Knicks caught a tired team. SA had a bunch of game in a short period of time.

That's what I said, then The People called me a lunatic,

But it was an aberration, specifically the margin of victory, not so much the victory it self. I think we're good enough to beat the Spurs on any day, but to blow them out of the water, that won't happen again, and we'll have to play much better to bang

how the hell was it an aberration when we beat them twice? Do you guys know what that word means?

Yea, like "sebstar's face is an aberration"

Now that's some brilliant argumentation.

Please, bring me some more of that for how we beat the Heat twice.

AND 1 time we beat them without Melo playing.Figure that out SMFH LOL HATERS GONNA HATE

hurrican sandy hits, blow out heat

duncan and pop are sleepy, blow out spurs

not saying we can't beat these teams, but you won't blow them out again this year