There is two players on that team that has won DPOY, and another that is usually 1st or 2nd team.

No excuses for that mess out there.

newyorknewyork wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Why? They look better (or less bad) with MDA than with Mike Brown. Before MDA, it looked like this was a group of players whose time has passed.

They just lost to the Orlando Magic and have some bad losses to the Kings, Pacers, and now Orlando over the last 8 games.

Bonn1997 wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Why? They look better (or less bad) with MDA than with Mike Brown. Before MDA, it looked like this was a group of players whose time has passed.

They just lost to the Orlando Magic and have some bad losses to the Kings, Pacers, and now Orlando over the last 8 games.

That doesn't contradict anything I wrote

Sure it does.

You posted as if Mike D'antoni has righted the ship.

He's officially sunken it now.

Bonn1997 wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Why? They look better (or less bad) with MDA than with Mike Brown. Before MDA, it looked like this was a group of players whose time has passed.

They just lost to the Orlando Magic and have some bad losses to the Kings, Pacers, and now Orlando over the last 8 games.

That doesn't contradict anything I wrote

Y is this acceptable to you. Shouldn't you be calling MDA Mr.500 right now? Then again I'm not even looking to blame MDA. We all know who he is and what his system is. if they moved around some pieces that fit his system then I have no doubt that he would be doing very wel right now though it would still be questionable if his system can win it all.

I am more talking about the players. It was argued that the players and the system didn't fit together with the Knicks. Yet many people didn't want to hear that and just wanted to blame one specific person. Yet players that are viewed as even better then Melo are in the same situation as him and are producing similar results while he is excelling when put in a position to succeed.

newyorknewyork wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

newyorknewyork wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Why? They look better (or less bad) with MDA than with Mike Brown. Before MDA, it looked like this was a group of players whose time has passed.

They just lost to the Orlando Magic and have some bad losses to the Kings, Pacers, and now Orlando over the last 8 games.

That doesn't contradict anything I wrote

Y is this acceptable to you. Shouldn't you be calling MDA Mr.500 right now? Then again I'm not even looking to blame MDA. We all know who he is and what his system is. if they moved around some pieces that fit his system then I have no doubt that he would be doing very wel right now though it would still be questionable if his system can win it all.

I am more talking about the players. It was argued that the players and the system didn't fit together with the Knicks. Yet many people didn't want to hear that and just wanted to blame one specific person. Yet players that are viewed as even better then Melo are in the same situation as him and are producing similar results while he is excelling when put in a position to succeed.

With no real perimeter players other then kobe, forgetaboutit..

MSG3 wrote:The following are 2 statements that I believe to be true:

1) You cannot judge D'Antoni on the Lakers until he has Nash back for a few weeks
2) D'Antoni has not had success in this league without Nash. Nash made him. It's not a coincidence that our record was so much better right after D'Antoni left. To not admit this is foolish.