Here is the thing, Gallo was not not the center piece and the trade allowed Denver to gain flexibility and pursue a roster in a different manner than the knicks. So its just not one player vs another.
Knicks had to take an unorthodox path to fill its roster needs.
I think Denver has a longer time horizon than the Knicks N*TPhobic conquest.
And does it really matter if the knicks are not that "Pure" in its roster construction?
This fantastic fable of "The older players with something to prove flocked to save the Mecca and return its fans to the lost glory so long a go!"
Who cares why, if you dig the team just enjoy it!
This notion that since we are 7-1 somehow validates everything and the arguments ensuing to substantiate its reality is really getting old. Just enjoy the games.
Two clubs took different paths.
Maybe its a "Win-Win?"
and if so, why is that so bad?