They are 11-1. Just something I thought was kinda of interesting.

now score 100+ every night NYKthen well be 71-11(how much do i dream!?!?!)

right if not for Don F'N' Chaney!

Posted by daddynel:

bad substitutions, but let's not dwell.good observation MATT.

Over a hundred is a good nite for any team. I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of teams had a winning record when they scored 100. Sorry to state the obvious.

Not to disrespect any of you, yet the real qestion there is not that we're 11-1 when we scores 100+. That means nothing unless you have the info about which team we payed against.

Example, we play Atl, Wash and Orlando. We're 3-0 and we score over than 100pts in each game.

What does that mean ? Nothing cause of our opponent's level, which is so low that it enabled us to score 100+.

See my point ? If in those games, we scored 12 times over 100 and that, ie 7 teams we beat currently have better record than us, then, it would probably mean that scoring a lot helps us winning.

Another stat to analyze is : within those teams we beat while scoring 100+, was there any that have beaten us when we scored under 100 ? If not, that would mean that scoring doesn't bring any difference since we still won without scoring 100+.

Just compiling scoring stats leads to confuse cause (= reason) and consequence. But you could also be 100% right, I just wanted to warn you a bit.

(btw : Hope you could undertand what I meant .)