Bonn1997 wrote:eViL wrote:i think this current Knicks team compares very favorably to the Suns that should have beat the Spurs 5 years ago.
SUNS KNICKS
Amare -- Amare HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS DUE TO AGE
Barbosa -- Shumpert HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS
Nash -- Lin HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS
Marion -- Melo I'VE SAID ENOUGH ON MELO ALREADY
Bell -- Fields TIE
Diaw -- Tyson HUGE ADVANTAGE KNICKS
J.Jones -- Novak
K.Thomas -- Jeffries A
obviously, Lin has to stay at his current level and the Melo has to fit. however, i don't think that's out of the realm of possibility.
Amare -- Amare HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS DUE TO AGE
Barbosa -- Shumpert HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS
Nash -- Lin HUGE ADVANTAGE SUNS
Marion -- Melo I'VE SAID ENOUGH ON MELO ALREADY
Bell -- Fields TIE
Diaw -- Tyson HUGE ADVANTAGE KNICKS
I don't think it's close
I wouldn't say Sun's Amare has a huge advantage. Last year Amare was playing just fine, and with an expanded repetoire over his younger days with a reliable jump shot.
Barbosa - Shumpert, again, I wouldn't say huge advantage Sun's. Shumpert is a rookie, but he's a terrific defender, and when not asked to run the offense, he's a great fit for this team. I'd say this is a push, but I'm fine if you want to give the edge to Barbosa for polish.
Nash - Lin, yes. As awesome as Lin has been lately, you still have to give a huge advantage to 2007 Nash. There's really no discussion there. Lin would have to keep up this insane production for the rest of the year to make it a conversation. I welcome that.
Melo and Marion are COMPLETELY different players. You cannot even compare them. Melo is a scorer, and Marion excelled as a rebounder/defender/garbage man.
Bell - Fields, yes.
Diaw - Tyson, yes.
Basically, I think it really comes down to the two key matchups: Nash/Lin and Diaw/Chandler. And sprinkle in intangible: chemistry. If Knicks can continue with the chemistry they've had as late, I think nothing is impossible for them.