[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Berger:Failed deals proves the nba has become a parade of fools and shallow storylines
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/12/2011  9:25 PM
Failed deals prove NBA has become a parade of fools and shallow storylines
By Ken Berger | CBSSports.com NBA Insider

So the Hornets are on the verge of being 0-for-2 in trying to do their job, which is to trade Chris Paul for the best assets they could get.

The Hornets lose, and so do the city of New Orleans and the rest of the NBA. And if you're beginning to think that this is what ending the lockout was all about -- replacing boring labor stories with prima-donna soap operas and dysfunctional trade negotiations brokered by league executives who couldn't run an NBA team if their life depended on it -- then you're not alone.

The start of the season is less than two weeks away, and two of the biggest stars in the game are stuck in awkward love-hate relationships with their teams and cities. Several teams can't even field enough bodies for a legitimate practice, and there hasn't been a hint of interest in the actual product, the sport itself. Only a sideshow, a WWE-like charade.

The NBA has become a parade of fools and shallow storylines. It's like NASCAR, or pro wrestling, or bubble gum. That initial burst of flavor, that rush, is addicting. But it's a short-lived high, and after you chew on it for a while, it loses its flavor and you realize there was no substance there in the first place.

The worst part is, people are starting to see right through it all. As more than one person involved in the NBA for the better part of their adult lives told me in recent days, this is an embarrassing time to be associated with the sport.

"Deplorable," said one of those people, who is supposed to be making his living running a team in a professional sports league, but instead feels as though he's stuck in a bad reality TV series where sensationalism and gotcha moments are all that matter.

To recap: Commissioner David Stern, in concert with league executives Joel Litvin and Stu Jackson, disallowed a trade that would've sent Paul to the Lakers in a three-team deal that would've sent Pau Gasol to the Rockets. Shellshocked and beside themselves, the Hornets brass nonetheless re-engaged Clippers management about a deal that would've sent Paul to Staples Center as a member of the Clippers.

The league office, in its role as arbiter of personnel decisions for the league-owned Hornets -- a role that is way more of a sham than the players dissolving their union a few weeks ago during the lockout -- drove such a hard bargain in that deal that the Clippers pulled out of the talks Monday. General manager Neil Olshey was unwilling to part with a massive haul of assets that included young star Eric Gordon and Minnesota's unprotected 2012 first-round pick for Paul, who sources say had only committed not to opt out of his deal after the season as part of the trade.

"We felt it was in the best interest of the team to keep this roster intact," Olshey told reporters Monday.

Two-and-through with Paul was never going to be good enough at that price for the Clippers, who perhaps for the first time in their history have assembled enough young talent and cap flexibility to be not a laughingstock, but a meaningful, valued member of the NBA. Something the Hornets, at this rate, will never get a chance to be.

Under these fluid and unprecedented circumstances, an executive briefed on the talks told CBSSports.com that the league was trying to re-engage the Clippers in talks for Paul Monday afternoon. Earlier, sources had indicated the talks "died" Monday morning when Clippers management became frustrated with the steep demands for the All-Star point guard and the frustrating process under which the talks were taking place.

As far as the team was concerned Monday, "It's over," a person familiar with the situation said.

The strong perception among rival executives Monday was that Stern and his fellow executives felt the backlash of the Lakers decision and realized they were boxed into a corner. If the league, which has owned the Hornets since December 2010, wouldn't let Paul go to the Lakers, where could it let him go? How would it be OK for Paul to be a Clipper, or a Celtic?

At the same time, how could they allow Paul to be stranded in New Orleans, opening the door to potential legal action from the union and, more important, crippling the franchise if Paul left for nothing as a free agent after the season?

Meanwhile, rival executives were scratching their heads as to whose business was it whether the Hornets received accomplished veteran players like Lamar Odom, Luis Scola and Kevin Martin for Paul, or prospects and draft picks? Simply put, it should have been solely up to the people who would have to live with that decision on a daily basis -- the people whose reputations and jobs are on the line.

It should have been up to Hornets GM Dell Demps, his front office staff, coach Monty Williams and his coaches. But in this alternative sports universe created by the mind-boggling conflict of interest resulting from 29 teams owning team No. 30, it was the commissioner's office evaluating the subjective merits of various trade options. It was a perfect storm at the end of the lockout, which has produced zero excitement over what perhaps will be Tim Duncan's last season in the NBA or the Celtics' last run at a title with their current core and has instead only been good for spitting out one sensational, vapid storyline after another. It has been a smorgasbord of the absurd over the past 72 hours as the NBA made a seamless transition from professional sports property to guest on the Maury Povich Show. Deron Williams, one of the stars of the league, labeled Stern a "bully" for nixing the Lakers trade -- a decision that ultimately could cost Williams' Nets dearly if it results in Dwight Howard getting traded to the Lakers instead of New Jersey/Brooklyn.

Kobe Bryant, the preeminent basketball talent of his generation, said derisively that Stern "can do whatever the hell he wants. He's the commissioner." The next day, after Odom was sent to Mark Cuban's defending champion Mavericks for free instead of the New Orleans for Paul, Bryant said, "I don't think Mark Cuban is protesting this trade."

Howard, whose representatives are seeking a trade to the Lakers, Nets or Mavericks without the potential of league interference because those teams all have owners, took the deplorable step of throwing general manager Otis Smith under the bus this past weekend. Howard didn't have enough say in the team's personnel decisions, he said, stooping to a level where not even LeBron James would go on his way out of Cleveland.

At media day Monday, bygones were bygones. Howard said, "If it is meant for me to stay here, I'll stay" -- as long as the team was willing to change some things so it could compete for a championship, which it's already done. Magic CEO Alex Martins said he's "confident that we can work with Dwight and convince him to stay here long term."

Good luck with that. A rival team executive predicted that the Magic will "get burned" if they think they can patch things up with Howard and keep him.

On the next Maury ...

But the most perceptive and telling quote about the whole fiasco came from Lakers guard Derek Fisher, who as president of the National Basketball Players Association got a glimpse behind the curtain at the brutal, dictatorial and increasingly shortsighted way the NBA is run. Time after time throughout the summer and fall, Fisher would emerge from 12- and 15-hour bargaining sessions looking as though he'd just learned where the bodies were buried.

"I just think the overall approach to things in this business is getting a little bit difficult to stomach," Fisher said.

Don't worry, Fish. We're all right there with you, ready to barf.

The NBA had a chance to close the lid on all this madness during the collective bargaining negotiations, and took a pass. In some ways, it was to their credit. Rather than lose the season, the league chose compromise and tried to fire up the engines for a shortened season starting on Christmas. In retrospect, that is looking like an eminently poor decision.

It is becoming painfully apparent that the short-term gain of having a season without solving the power struggle between stars and teams has too many unsightly side-effects. And we haven't even gotten to the back-to-back-to-backs, the brutal travel schedule, and the ugly basketball that we'll get starting on Dec. 25, like a giant lump of steaming coal burning a hole in our stockings.

The genie got out of the bottle last July, when James and Dwyane Wade behaved how they'd been raised in the NBA to behave: like stars who always get their way. For so long, the league has marketed the stars as the product, made it a game and a business of individuals, big markets and relentless self promotion. And last summer, a new generation of owners didn't like it and threatened to shut down the sport for a long time until it was fixed.

The only way that was going to happen was a season-long lockout, with copious amounts of financial carnage and pain. In fairness, the players caved, too. They had set themselves up for the mother of all antitrust lawsuits -- had Stern and his owners right where they wanted them, their legal advisers insisted. And they let everybody off the hook, chose a flawed agreement and an unresolved battle for control over a longer, bloodier fight in which a clear winner ultimately would've been declared.

Instead, we get this passive-aggressive, junior-high musical. We get the lowest common denominator.

Now, they're trying to put the genie back in the bottle, and it doesn't want to go. It's business as usual in the NBA, only worse, and substance and the value of the product -- the sport itself -- is in a fight for its life against short-sighted soap operas and the instant gratification of sensational stories written on the backs of bubble-gum cards -- one after another, after another, until we all just want to be sick.

And the sport, the product, and everything it should be about, is losing in a landslide.

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/16430520/failed-deals-prove-nba-has-become-a-parade-of-fools-and-shallow-storylines?fb_xd_fragment#?=&cb=f128648ff50db7d&relation=parent&transport=fragment&frame=f32dacd0997e17e&error=unknown_user

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71157
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/12/2011  9:32 PM
IN a few weeks we'd be watching basketball, Someone offers a great trade, and we got just hoop.

Nice article, but really who cares. Stern is an ASS, owners are greedy and vengeful and the rich get richer.

NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL all can stand accused of the same thing.

Yet we watch.......And players want to be paid.......and after they are paid they want to play in other cities where the lights are brighter and win with friends.

Roids in baseball, Pujols paid Aroid money, and some dude named CJ wilson got 77 mil to pitch for the angels.

And In an undefeated run the Packers sold 60 mil worth of worthless paper to fund stadium improvements so they can buy a jacket that says owner.
Packers just ripped off half of Wisconsin!

And the NBA is nuts?

martin
Posts: 76224
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/12/2011  9:32 PM
every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/12/2011  9:46 PM
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.


When Demps thought he was running things I believe he stated that he was determined not to put his team into the situation the Nuggets were in last year. He wanted to focus on the season, not have distractions and get fair compensation for his star player who wasn't returning after the season. He felt he did that and was getting talent back. It was widely reported that some owners were very upset that Paul was ending up in LA. The Gilbert email was leaked. Stern denied reports that he voided the trade because of owner pressure but it at least appeared that this might be the case. You might say that the attempted fleecing of the Clippers would have been a better trade for the Hornets but reports that the league office was trying to move Paul because of the voided Laker trade are out there. Berger is a pretty tuned in guy. I think he has it right with this article.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/13/2011  12:15 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/13/2011  12:16 AM
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.


NO one in the media shares our view of the original CP3 trade to the lakers. I find it really amazing. I mean, I think I've been disliking Stern for longer than most, but I still thought he was right to nix the deal as an owner of the Hornets. I didn't see for the life of me, why NO would want that kind of package.

My feeling is the Clips will eventually get it done. The season hasn't even started yet, theyve got time. They shouldn't just roll over and give up everything tho. I thougth their offer was perfect really. Young assets, and a for sure, high pick in a quality draft. WHat more could they really ask for and what team is it that they think will give it to them? He's not gonna resign in Minny or any other bad team with young assets and high picks so what is it that they want? I don't get it.

martin
Posts: 76224
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/13/2011  12:19 AM
Killa4luv wrote:
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.


NO one in the media shares our view of the original CP3 trade to the lakers. I find it really amazing. I mean, I think I've been disliking Stern for longer than most, but I still thought he was right to nix the deal as an owner of the Hornets. I didn't see for the life of me, why NO would want that kind of package.

My feeling is the Clips will eventually get it done. The season hasn't even started yet, theyve got time. They shouldn't just roll over and give up everything tho. I thougth their offer was perfect really. Young assets, and a for sure, high pick in a quality draft. WHat more could they really ask for and what team is it that they think will give it to them? He's not gonna resign in Minny or any other bad team with young assets and high picks so what is it that they want? I don't get it.

agreed completely.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/13/2011  12:29 AM
Killa4luv wrote:
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.


NO one in the media shares our view of the original CP3 trade to the lakers. I find it really amazing. I mean, I think I've been disliking Stern for longer than most, but I still thought he was right to nix the deal as an owner of the Hornets. I didn't see for the life of me, why NO would want that kind of package.

My feeling is the Clips will eventually get it done. The season hasn't even started yet, theyve got time. They shouldn't just roll over and give up everything tho. I thougth their offer was perfect really. Young assets, and a for sure, high pick in a quality draft. WHat more could they really ask for and what team is it that they think will give it to them? He's not gonna resign in Minny or any other bad team with young assets and high picks so what is it that they want? I don't get it.

couldn't agree with you guys more.

the lakers deal was a terrible one and stern nixed the deal rightfully so. i think killa in another thread stated that noh was going to be taking on 4yr and 80mill of contracts. what about that is intriguing to not only the owners (who are currently paying their payroll) or the any ownership group looking to buy the team? they are interested in buying the team with a low payroll and a future. what is the future in getting 29yo Martin, 31yo Scola 32yo odom? there is absolutely nothing appealing there.. at all.

stern did the right thing for the league by not giving paul for free. like martin said, berger is one of my favorite reporters (along with wojo and hahn) but he couldn't be more wrong on this.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Nalod
Posts: 71157
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/13/2011  7:58 AM
With Billups on roster they can move him to play some 2 making the trade workable.

But I agree with Clips that Paul should commit to extend. Its a big price to pay for a two year rental!

A trade that nets NO Gordon and Minny #1 pick is much better than Rocket Package.

Clusterphuch? Of course. Parade of fools? No more than any other league!

arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/13/2011  8:21 AM
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.

Any business where bureaucracy get unlimited power and professionals are expelled or misused the failure is inevitable.
The only question is how bad the destruction will be...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/13/2011  9:42 AM
arkrud wrote:
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.

For any business where bureaucracy get unlimited power and professionals are expelled or misused the failure is inevitable.
The only question is how bad the destruction will be...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Nalod
Posts: 71157
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/13/2011  9:47 AM
arkrud wrote:
martin wrote:every once in a while reporters that I respect come out with the dumbest articles, IMHO this is one of them.

the players and situation with the Lakers trade did not make sense to me from a financial and long-term prospect of making the team sell-able. OK, so management nixed the trade.

And now they have engaged LAC... for what, like 2 days now, and haven't come away with a deal. Why is that embarrassing? It took the Knicks months and months to pry away Melo. It's called negotiation.

Any business where bureaucracy get unlimited power and professionals are expelled or misused the failure is inevitable.
The only question is how bad the destruction will be...

any institution where the inmates are running the show is also doomed!

They are working thru a problem. Problems arise, mistakes are made and experience paves a new standard to deal with them.

Far from perfect is any business.

In the meantime the players at risk are compensated very nicely. Hardship is not really an issue.

Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/13/2011  10:39 AM
By claiming Billups for about $2 million, the Clippers were able to solve the dilemma of not having another point guard on the roster -- Mo Williams likely slides into the Jason Terry sixth man role, if he isn't included in the trade or waived with amnesty. Thus, L.A. could responsibly include Bledsoe in a blockbuster package for Paul. Given that the league already has vetoed a previous three-team trade that would've sent Paul to the Lakers, executives brokering the deal for the owner-less Hornets "have nowhere else to go," said a person familiar with the negotiations. "They have no choice" but to make sure Paul is traded to the Clippers, the person said. CBSSports.com

1. The winning bid for Chaucey was 2 million. lol! I'd say his services were not exactly in high demand. And I like Chauncey and wanted him here to mentor Iman.
2. Of course they have no choice, didn't we all figure this out yesterday? What is the league thinking?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/14/2011  10:57 PM
So as it turns out, we could all be NBA analysts. Exactly what we agreed would happen, happened. Now lets all agree on a championship for the Knicks!!
Berger:Failed deals proves the nba has become a parade of fools and shallow storylines

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy