[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Jamal Crawford vs Barea in the pick and roll?


Author Poll
RonRon
Posts: 5531
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246

My personal opinion is that Barea play's the pick and roll more effectively with his quickness and hold to defend because he is small, and quick, and surprisingly strong.
Barea is not a high volume shooter
Barea is a good 3 point shooter
Barea penetrates and scores in the paint.
Barea is younger and showed it all year and hit clutch shots in the game and playoffs.
Dirk, Terry, Barea were all 3 crucial and were the 3 go to guys on Dallas last year to finish the game.
Barea stay's in front of his guy, allowing the help defense to come.

Crawford take's bad shots but can hit them. Which can be good or very bad...
Hit's free throws at a high %
Can throw the alley hoop better than anyone on our team, besides Iman *we don't know for sure how effective his passing game is*
His defense is matador as Clyde would say, although he is taller than Barea, he doesn't stay in front of his man as well as him.
The way he could hit or miss shots, can kill team chemistry. It can also cause Melo and Amare to play for the spotlight.
He has become a lot more team oriented, he still take's bad shots, even though he is capable of make them, but not nearly as much as when he was a Knick.
His age is a very big question, many players his age go downhill, however, it's not something we can predict. However, it must be a con we must consider.

I would prefer a even more team oriented offense.
I am afraid Jamal can cause that 1v1 play that Melo did a lot. My concern is that it can cause a multiple effect with our offense being stagnant and 1v1 play's with

Melo,
Jamal
Amare

Dantoni's SSOL system, is suppose to be used starting with the pick and roll to facilitate the offense.
It's used to earn the step for a player and to take the a good shot and spreading the floor.
It is not a 3 point shooting contest that some believe it is...


1) Jamal is what we need. Even if we lost the exemption to sign Shawne Williams or Ak47. Losing TD, Fields.
2) Jamal is a luxury, would not do it if we loss the exemption to sign Shawne or AK47. However, would do it if we it was

TD
Balkman
Walker

3) Wouldn't do it, if we loss TD, Fields, or anyone. However, if we lost the exemption to sign Shawne WIlliams or Ak47 it would be fine.
4) Would not take Jamal as he is a cancer

If we could only sign one of these players then who would u prefer for this team?

5) Prefer Barea
6) Prefer Shawne WIlliam
7) Prefer Ak47
8) Prefer Peja for min deal
9) Prefer Anthony Parker
8) his defense is a big weak link. However, he this is the first time he play's with big center for pick and rolls of Tyson Chandler's size and presence. Think it will work if we don't give up anyone and keeping our 2.5 exemtion
10) Big Liability and wouldn't do it if we lost players or the 2.5 exemption

It's a close call, let's vote and respect each other's opinion....
We all want what is best for the Knick's but have different POV about Jamal!

Jamal is exactly what we need
Jamal is a luxury, but wouldn't part with Iman or Fields, or lose the 2.5 exemption
Jamal is not needed, if we have to part with TD, Fields, but okay if he comes for 2.5 exemption
Jamal is a cancer, no need for him and risk with age
Prefer Barea
Prefer Shawne Williams
Prefer Ak47
Prefer Peja for min
Prefer Anthony Parker
Big Liability and wouldn't do it if we lost players or the 2.5 exemption
View Results


Author Thread
No Posts Found
Jamal Crawford vs Barea in the pick and roll?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy