[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Nash is a free agent too at the end of the season
Author Thread
TLover
Posts: 21066
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
12/4/2011  8:35 PM
He may not be Paul or D.Will but not a bad third choice. Another reason why we need to focus on Dwight Howard. Nash lives in NYC in the off-season and would probably sign straight up as a free agent. Not sure if the Suns are willing to give him the full bird rights extension.
AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35448
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/4/2011  8:44 PM
I've been very supportive of this. Nash will come for mid level money and we will be able to resign our current role players plus add some more depth. Nash wants to win a title and should give it a last chance in new york. Nash, Melo, and Stat is still a great big 3. Fields is the perfect SG for Nash with his ability to shoot and move without the ball. There will be money left over to add depth too. This is the best case scenario that doesn't include one of the major FAs.
AnubisADL
Posts: 27382
Alba Posts: 13
Joined: 6/29/2009
Member: #2771
USA
12/4/2011  8:57 PM
Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.
NY Knicks - Retirement home for players and GMs
TLover
Posts: 21066
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
12/4/2011  9:01 PM
Shumpert would make up for Nash's defensive shortcomings. Also a legit Center can cover for him.
Erniecat
Posts: 20577
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2005
Member: #851
12/4/2011  10:46 PM
AnubisADL wrote:Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.

I have to agree. In fact, Nash turns 38 in February, meaning if we sign him this summer, we'd have a 39-year-old starting point guard for the second half of next season. If we played the Bulls in the 2013 playoffs, it would be 24-year-old Derrick Rose vs. 39-year-old Steve Nash at the point. !

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

12/5/2011  12:18 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/5/2011  12:19 AM
Erniecat wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.

I have to agree. In fact, Nash turns 38 in February, meaning if we sign him this summer, we'd have a 39-year-old starting point guard for the second half of next season. If we played the Bulls in the 2013 playoffs, it would be 24-year-old Derrick Rose vs. 39-year-old Steve Nash at the point. !

Steve Nash takes care of his body better than any player in the league. He had a great year last year and I'm willing to be he's playing at 70 percent of his MVP days when he hits 40.

He was aboslutley awesome season on a pretty **** team... don't think either of you watched him play

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
12/5/2011  3:01 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:
Erniecat wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.

I have to agree. In fact, Nash turns 38 in February, meaning if we sign him this summer, we'd have a 39-year-old starting point guard for the second half of next season. If we played the Bulls in the 2013 playoffs, it would be 24-year-old Derrick Rose vs. 39-year-old Steve Nash at the point. !

Steve Nash takes care of his body better than any player in the league. He had a great year last year and I'm willing to be he's playing at 70 percent of his MVP days when he hits 40.

He was aboslutley awesome season on a pretty **** team... don't think either of you watched him play


Even if thats true which isn't anywhere near provable, taking care of one's body can only delay the effects of aging. 39 is 39. Odds are against him remaining health much beyond that. And we don't need 1 way players. If MDA wasnt the coach we wouldn't even be talking about Nash.

If we're gonna overreach for a PG it should be Paul.

SupremeCommander
Posts: 34057
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

12/5/2011  3:43 AM
Killa4luv wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
Erniecat wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.

I have to agree. In fact, Nash turns 38 in February, meaning if we sign him this summer, we'd have a 39-year-old starting point guard for the second half of next season. If we played the Bulls in the 2013 playoffs, it would be 24-year-old Derrick Rose vs. 39-year-old Steve Nash at the point. !

Steve Nash takes care of his body better than any player in the league. He had a great year last year and I'm willing to be he's playing at 70 percent of his MVP days when he hits 40.

He was aboslutley awesome season on a pretty **** team... don't think either of you watched him play


Even if thats true which isn't anywhere near provable, taking care of one's body can only delay the effects of aging. 39 is 39. Odds are against him remaining health much beyond that. And we don't need 1 way players. If MDA wasnt the coach we wouldn't even be talking about Nash.

If we're gonna overreach for a PG it should be Paul.

to avoid turing this into an argument around semantics, let me alter my original statement to:

Steve Nash takes care of his body better than as well as any player in the league

try googling "the Steve Nash diet" if my word isn't good enough

And who, besides you, said that I prefer Steve Nash to Chris Paul

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
Knixkik
Posts: 35448
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/5/2011  6:49 AM
People have to just look past his age. The man is a freak of nature. He is not like any 37 year old in the league. The same will go when he's 38, 39, and 40. No one is suggesting a long-term deal. But if not Paul, then Nash is the perfect PG for this team. Shumpert and Douglas will give plenty of depth off the bench to keep his minutes down and put less pressure on Nash's defense.
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
12/5/2011  9:10 AM
I'd love to have Steve Nash. It might depend on who our coach will be for next year. If D'Antoni is extended, there is a better chance that Nash would sign here.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/5/2011  9:20 AM
Erniecat wrote:
AnubisADL wrote:Steve Nash is 37 years old man. He cant hang with the young guys physically and would be a MASSIVE liability on the defensive end. He be an ideal PG off the bench though.

I have to agree. In fact, Nash turns 38 in February, meaning if we sign him this summer, we'd have a 39-year-old starting point guard for the second half of next season. If we played the Bulls in the 2013 playoffs, it would be 24-year-old Derrick Rose vs. 39-year-old Steve Nash at the point. !

who says he has to be "the" starting point guard? Nash seems like a very intelligent baller without the huge ego most suffer from. I think he'd be ok coming off the bench as long as he's helping his team.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Nash is a free agent too at the end of the season

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy