[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Question about NBA player contracts:
Author Thread
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
11/25/2011  10:19 AM
Lets say a NY Knick player has a 1 year, 1 million dollar deal. How much of that does he actually get, after all the taxes and such. Does the BRI effect this contract? Or does the BRI simply effect actually getting the contract? Or both?
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76215
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/25/2011  11:01 AM
Agents get upwards of 4%. NBAP holds back some (in recent years) for the warchest. NBA holds back some for BRI calculation. Taxes should be > 30%. Some of the paycheck prob goes into retirement fund.

My understanding is that the BRI is a formula that figures out $ for both owners and players and sets up how much each side is to get based on a percentage of the whole BRI number. After that, as with this past year, each player's income was scaled down a hint proportionally because the owner did not get enough of the BRI % on their side of things.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/25/2011  11:19 AM
BRI is an overarching total of agreed upon basketball revenues. It's not ALL the revenue the league collects as it might seem. Some revenue isn't included at all like money teams receive from luxury tax paying teams. Other revenue is paid into the system at only 40-50%!

40% of proceeds from arena signage
40% of proceeds from luxury suites
45% - 50% of proceeds from arena naming rights
Proceeds from other premium seat licenses

Some of the things specifically not included in BRI are proceeds from the grant of expansion teams, fines, and revenue sharing (e.g. luxury tax).

Also teams have been allowed to fudge the numbers on what they make on their local TV deals. ie. The Knicks have not paid an exact % of their TV earnings. It's only an estimate and it's a fixed amount that doesn't take into account increases that may occur.

The league withholds about 10% of the players earnings in escrow just incase they collectively get paid more than 57%. this last year the players didn't get paid 57% and so the owners had to pay from the escrow.

I'm not a tax specialist but I would guess a million $ contract player pays at 35% fed tax rate and state and city varies.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
11/25/2011  11:21 AM
Allanfan20 wrote:Lets say a NY Knick player has a 1 year, 1 million dollar deal. How much of that does he actually get, after all the taxes and such. Does the BRI effect this contract? Or does the BRI simply effect actually getting the contract? Or both?

I'm not sure about normal tax etc, but from what I understand, under the last cba, the league would keep 8% of every players salary (this is what they mean when they talk of the escrow). If at the end of the year the total of every players salaries added together exceed the BRI figure (57% under the last cba), then the nba would keep whatever amount of the 8% escrow they needed to to make up for the difference. Last season, the nba ended up having to give all of the 8% back to the players because the total players salaries were under the 57% of BRI required.

A problem in the negotiations for this new cba is that the owners want initially to increase the escrow to 10%, but if that still isn't enough to make up for any overspend (which it may not be for the first few season as players are going down from 57% to 50%, and I really don't see how they are going to make the figures work out!), they want it to be more open ended, so the following season they could increase the escrow to make up for the previous season. The players oppose this on the basis that % could really spiral for a few years- they want it capped at 10%. I can see where the unions coming from, but at the same time they have agreed to 50% of BRI so how else are the owners going to get any overspend back?

So, I've just used an online tax calculator, and typed in 900,000 as the salary (the $1mil minus the 10% escrow), and it gave the take home pay as being approx $522,000- yikes! If a player got the same salary in a state that didn't have state income tax, then they would get around $580,000 (according to the tax calculator)

Throughout the lockout it keeps being said that big market teams like NY have an advantage- but we really don't when it comes to smaller contracts because at the end of the day, the players take home pay on a $1mil contract will be lower in NY than it would be in other states which have no income tax, and much lower rent/living costs. For example, on a MLE contract of $5mil, according to that same tax calculator, NY after tax pay would be $2,790,000 (approx), compared to $3,130,000 (approx) in say Florida, thats almost half a million difference- how is that fair?

Question about NBA player contracts:

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy