[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Owners are full of Crap!
Author Thread
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/8/2011  3:58 PM
The owners are trying to be slick. The NBA got thru the recession almost unscathed. They had a banner year in revenues and things look good for the future. Also check this bit of info out?

2012-13 Contracts
Atlanta - $60,921,971
Boston - $29,421,145
Charlotte - $29,796,338
Chicago - $50,902,511
Cleveland - $31,253,012
Dallas - $44,649,384
Denver - $16,552,549
Detroit - $41,610,000
Golden St - $44,327,622
Houston - $28,097,882
Indiana - $23,907,329
LA Clips - $24,382,411
LA Lakers - $67,607,960
Memphis - $26,940,532
Miami - $65,724,000
Milwaukee - $43,871,253
Minnesota - $30,255,802
New Jersey - $36,529,457
New Orleans - $44,161,667
New York - $41,073,799
Oklahoma - $44,473,021
Orlando - $75,665,410
Philadelphia - $39,268,604
Phoenix - $28,648,960
Portland - $50,637,785
Sacramento - $23,312,624
San Antonio - $44,345,492
Toronto - $39,525,281
Utah - $41,643,040
Washington - $41,205,942


Where is the doom and gloom the owners are claiming? Almost every team has the ability to manage their cap situation after this season. There's no epidemic of over the cap teams!!! It's the exact opposite. Also there aren't enough stars left to force teams to spend so that they'd be over the cap. There is no crisis!!! Now when you add this info to the fact the revenues are up despite many of the teams having no chance to get to a title, then what is all the owner crying about? The League is in great shape going forward and they know it. Some of the high price stars are due to retire soon and the only guys left that could be signed are CP3, Howard and Deron right now. That's not enough to send all these under the cap teams into financial hardship. Any new young stars will be on rookie contracts for a while. The league is set for success.

Just look at the attendance numbers for last year. Where is the huge problem in getting fans in the seats?

2011 Attendance	Home	Road	Overall
RK TEAM GMS TOTAL AVG PCT GMS AVG PCT GMS AVG PCT
1 Bulls 41 893,462 21,791 104.2 41 18,431 96.1 82 20,111 100.3
2 Trail Blazers 41 840,924 20,510 102.7 41 16,333 86.0 82 18,422 94.5
3 Cavaliers 41 824,595 20,112 97.8 41 16,200 84.1 82 18,156 91.2
4 Mavericks 41 824,162 20,101 104.7 41 16,657 87.7 82 18,379 96.2
5 Heat 41 810,930 19,778 100.9 41 19,447 100.9 82 19,612 100.9
6 NY Knicks 41 808,879 19,728 99.8 41 18,044 93.9 82 18,886 96.9
7 Jazz 41 799,982 19,511 98.0 41 17,331 91.2 82 18,421 94.7
8 Lakers 41 778,877 18,997 99.7 41 19,087 100.2 82 19,042 99.9
9 Magic 41 777,852 18,972 102.6 41 17,428 90.5 82 18,200 96.4
10 Warriors 41 766,398 18,692 95.4 41 17,049 89.6 82 17,871 92.5
11 Celtics 41 763,584 18,624 100.0 41 18,964 98.0 82 18,794 99.0
12 Spurs 41 750,879 18,314 98.6 41 17,389 91.1 82 17,851 94.8
13 Thunder 41 744,068 18,148 99.7 41 17,774 93.4 82 17,961 96.5
14 Clippers 41 727,462 17,742 93.1 41 17,614 92.7 82 17,678 92.9
15 Suns 41 720,249 17,567 95.4 41 17,462 91.6 82 17,514 93.5
16 Nuggets 41 692,968 16,901 88.2 41 17,285 90.8 82 17,093 89.5
17 Wizards 41 688,466 16,791 83.2 41 17,192 89.2 82 16,992 86.1
18 Pistons 41 683,080 16,660 75.5 41 16,732 87.5 82 16,696 81.1
19 Raptors 41 679,208 16,566 83.7 41 16,855 91.9 82 16,710 87.6
20 Rockets 41 663,839 16,191 89.7 41 16,943 88.9 82 16,567 89.3
21 Bobcats 41 649,694 15,846 83.1 41 16,473 85.5 82 16,159 84.3
22 Hawks 41 641,596 15,648 83.6 41 16,957 87.9 82 16,303 85.7
23 Bucks 41 631,910 15,412 82.3 41 16,911 87.4 82 16,162 84.9
24 Timberwolves 41 624,960 15,242 78.8 41 16,885 88.5 82 16,064 83.6
25 76ers 41 604,823 14,751 72.6 41 17,155 89.5 82 15,953 80.8
26 Hornets 41 603,088 14,709 86.1 41 17,179 89.9 82 15,944 88.1
27 Grizzlies 41 600,687 14,650 80.9 41 16,441 86.4 82 15,546 83.7
28 Nets 41 581,378 14,179 80.6 41 17,098 88.4 82 15,639 84.7
29 Kings 41 569,496 13,890 80.2 41 17,400 91.2 82 15,645 86.0
30 Pacers 41 555,077 13,538 74.5 41 16,844 87.0 82 15,191 81.0


Look at those attendance %'s. No one really fell off the map! As a league their future looks great. Only a select few teams are capped out after this season and it rectifies itself in the successive seasons anyway. Their is no crisis and they know it.


AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/8/2011  4:36 PM

Were are the net figures after expenses?
TheloniusMonk
Posts: 21470
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2004
Member: #705
USA
10/8/2011  7:29 PM
Yup. Great information. Thanx for posting that. Like I said, pay the men their worth based on what is made and stfu and let the season begin.
'You can catch me in Hollis at the hero shop!' -Tony Yayo
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/8/2011  10:14 PM
Nalod wrote:
Were are the net figures after expenses?

What the hell are you talking about? The owners are using this temporary set of losses as an excuse to squeeze more out of the players. But they know that most teams aren't heavily capped after the coming season. You have only 4 teams scheduled to be over the cap with no way of changing that situation. The vast majority of the teams will be under the cap and many WAY under the cap. There are only a small amount of big salary stars left that are not locked up in long term contracts. CP3, Howard & Deron.

The owners could agree to the players 52.4-47.6 split and make a profit. Unless all of these teams went crazy giving out big contracts to scrubs there's no way they can end up not making a profit.

ItalianStallion
Posts: 20196
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/22/2009
Member: #2526

10/9/2011  12:05 AM
Players salaries are not the only expense.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/9/2011  1:02 AM
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

I know the owners have other expenses, but it's the largest factor and pretty much the only thing the owners can control right now. Remember the owners wanted to back out the cost of financing to the tune of 350 Mil, deducted from the BRI. When owners sell teams they don't share those profits with the players. So why should the players be included in the costs of buying a team?

We've reached a point where there aren't going to be many teams at or above the cap. If that's the case then the owners should be able to turn a profit fairly easily. If not then they all are financial idiots for not figuring out before hand if they could cover their expenses if the players salaries are at or below the cap. This is why I blame the owners. How did they work the numbers when they knew before hand what the leagues revenues were and what their expenses where. If they knew these things how did they allow the players to have a % of the BRI that was more than they could afford to pay?

The owners are guilty of running their franchises poorly. Instead of streamlining their operations and making sound decisions they tend to run the teams in a wasteful manner. I also don't think that the owners have found a way to maximize profits using new methods and new marketing options.

smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
10/9/2011  6:13 AM
thanks for posting those figures nixluva- I agree, I honestly believe, regardless of the new CBA, we've seen the end of those days when lots of teams would exceed the cap by tens of millions- I think they've all learnt their lessons from the IT days.

The bottom line is that a well managed team wins and keeps their salaries in check, and a badly managed team does neither. Sometimes luck/ injuries come into play. I think shortening contracts by a year is fair enough, and it would be good for the league and players, but all of that hard cap cr*p etc is just a red herring- manage your teams better and with a slightly more even BRI sharing, you will be fine. If you manage your team badly and give out bad contracts then it's only fair that your team suffers the price (as we did).

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/9/2011  7:28 AM
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

But yet the owners are obsessively focused on this one type of expense.
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
10/9/2011  8:20 AM
nixluva wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Were are the net figures after expenses?

What the hell are you talking about? The owners are using this temporary set of losses as an excuse to squeeze more out of the players. But they know that most teams aren't heavily capped after the coming season. You have only 4 teams scheduled to be over the cap with no way of changing that situation. The vast majority of the teams will be under the cap and many WAY under the cap. There are only a small amount of big salary stars left that are not locked up in long term contracts. CP3, Howard & Deron.

The owners could agree to the players 52.4-47.6 split and make a profit. Unless all of these teams went crazy giving out big contracts to scrubs there's no way they can end up not making a profit.

So testy. It's almost like you work for the NBPA. Your insane fight on behalf of them is just that - insane.

These players don't care half as much as you do about this. They have their money. They just want to hold on to as much as they can of it. And even if they "give back" that 7%, they'll still be stinkin' rich.

And the owners will still be stinkin' rich with or without the 7%.

Both parties are pathetic. The only losers are the fans.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/9/2011  10:16 AM    LAST EDITED: 10/9/2011  10:19 AM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Were are the net figures after expenses?

What the hell are you talking about? The owners are using this temporary set of losses as an excuse to squeeze more out of the players. But they know that most teams aren't heavily capped after the coming season. You have only 4 teams scheduled to be over the cap with no way of changing that situation. The vast majority of the teams will be under the cap and many WAY under the cap. There are only a small amount of big salary stars left that are not locked up in long term contracts. CP3, Howard & Deron.

The owners could agree to the players 52.4-47.6 split and make a profit. Unless all of these teams went crazy giving out big contracts to scrubs there's no way they can end up not making a profit.

So testy. It's almost like you work for the NBPA. Your insane fight on behalf of them is just that - insane.

These players don't care half as much as you do about this. They have their money. They just want to hold on to as much as they can of it. And even if they "give back" that 7%, they'll still be stinkin' rich.

And the owners will still be stinkin' rich with or without the 7%.

Both parties are pathetic. The only losers are the fans.


It's not on equal grounds, though. The owners will always be stinkier, richer, and more pathetic. And your statement definitely doesn't apply to all players. Lots of 2nd round picks and guys on 10 day contracts don't make much.
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/9/2011  11:04 AM
The owners will always be stinkier, richer, and more pathetic.

Bonn, you sound very bitter..........

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/9/2011  12:22 PM
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

It is the largest by far.... if you are going into cost cutting mode in your own house, what bill are you looking to chop first? your 450 dollar utility bill, or your 5 dollar a week lottery purchases?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
ItalianStallion
Posts: 20196
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/22/2009
Member: #2526

10/9/2011  2:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

But yet the owners are obsessively focused on this one type of expense.

They have little to no control over most other costs.

You have to realize that the owners have hundreds of millions of dollars invested each in their teams. Just being profitable is not the appropriate standard of success. You have to get a good return on your money or you are an idiot because you could just as easily take all that money and invest it in stocks, bonds, real estate, and other profitable businesses anywhere in the world instead and get good returns.

If you have 100 million invested, you better being making at least 10-15 million a year or you are an idiot.

If you have 200 million invested, you better being making at least 20-30 million a year or you are an idiot.

If you have 300 million invested, you better being making at least 30-45 million a year or you are an idiot.

Etc...


The players have nothing invested in their teams. Their salaries are all profit that they are free to invest or spend elsewhere they want to either make more money or live the high life. If it's true that some of the owners are losing money (and it IS even if they are exaggerating), the smartest thing they could do is fold the franchise and cut their losses unless they get enough concessions to turn an APPROPRIATE profit (not just any profit). That's why they are being so harsh.

ItalianStallion
Posts: 20196
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/22/2009
Member: #2526

10/9/2011  2:54 PM
tkf wrote:
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

It is the largest by far.... if you are going into cost cutting mode in your own house, what bill are you looking to chop first? your 450 dollar utility bill, or your 5 dollar a week lottery purchases?

That was the point I was making in response to the idea that since they had some control of salaries they had control over everything. They don't. There are other expenses.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/9/2011  5:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 10/9/2011  5:36 PM
Nalod wrote:
The owners will always be stinkier, richer, and more pathetic.

Bonn, you sound very bitter..........


You make it sound like that's a bad thing!? If you're an NBA fan, you should be bitter right now!
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/9/2011  5:43 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
The owners will always be stinkier, richer, and more pathetic.

Bonn, you sound very bitter..........


You make it sound like that's a bad thing!? If you're an NBA fan, you should be bitter right now!

Nope, GOt until the superbowl to get upset.

I want the hoop, but lets be real here, fans don't get hurt cuz they are not paying for anything. Games cancelled, they get the money back. Im not saying I don't want an agreement, but its entertainment!

Bitter? Shoot, after all the team has put me thru over the years NOT playing is not the worst of it.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

10/9/2011  10:10 PM
I don't follow the owners are crap logic. I also don't see what a bunch of revenue numbers prove by themselves, like people have said you need to look at the bottomline, revenue is the top line. Ownwers are in it to make money they don'y owe anybody anything, least of all the fans. (I would rather if this was not the case, but reality is what it is).

Players do have something invested in it too, they have their entire careers and livelihood invested in it. It's not like they can make this type of money anywhere else.

Overall I think the players are extremely greedy and I hate guaranteed contracts the thing should be abolished forever. If all other sports can do without it then so can basketball.

I am sorry I have seen too many Eddy Curry, Jerome James on the bench matches to give a rats *** about players being abused by the system. I call BS on that idea.

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/10/2011  12:08 AM
loweyecue wrote:Overall I think the players are extremely greedy and I hate guaranteed contracts the thing should be abolished forever. If all other sports can do without it then so can basketball.

I am sorry I have seen too many Eddy Curry, Jerome James on the bench matches to give a rats *** about players being abused by the system. I call BS on that idea.


Man you couldn't be more wrong! So this all boils down to your disdain for players? You think that Curry and James is enough of a reason to trash on the other 400+ players? Guys burnout their joints playing this game!!! Ask Phil Jax and MANY other NBA greats how those Knee and Hip replacement surgeries feel? In the end I would have no problem with allowing teams to be able to void a contract of a player that just dogs it, but the vast majority of the players work hard and play hard and risk serious injury every time they play. They certainly put untold wear and tear on their bodies and pay for that in later years.

This thread is about the BS storyline the owners have put out there. "Oh we lost so much money. Help us!". Instead of just responding to this thread with Bias, how about looking in depth at the figures I posted and tell me how the owners are in such bad shape going forward? The owners know that the worst of the recession passed and they weathered the storm. Now only good days are ahead. Attendance is up! TV viewership is up! Just wait until the Heat/Knicks rivalry heats up over the next 5 years. The league is gonna be in great shape. There is no crisis. They're only using the losses based on the recession to cry wolf and squeeze the players in this negotiation.

Look at the cap numbers for all the teams and you'll see that maybe 4-5 teams are in any danger of paying a luxury tax. Teams have gotten smarter in how they pay salary. Plus there aren't many big contracts left to give out, except for CP3, Deron and Howard. The last free agent class took care of most of the leagues best players. All the other guys are so young they haven't hit the big money yet. From every indication the league is gonna be in great shape.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/10/2011  1:04 AM
ItalianStallion wrote:
tkf wrote:
ItalianStallion wrote:Players salaries are not the only expense.

It is the largest by far.... if you are going into cost cutting mode in your own house, what bill are you looking to chop first? your 450 dollar utility bill, or your 5 dollar a week lottery purchases?

That was the point I was making in response to the idea that since they had some control of salaries they had control over everything. They don't. There are other expenses.


well what do you want to cut?

I have some ideas..

cut advertising.. we all know that Advertising does very little for the NBA.. right?

Cut the private Jets to games.. I mean these guys can fly coach... heck, how about the bus...

Cut health insurance

Five star hotels

per diems

State of the art practice facilities and training staff...


How about cutting those expenses? shall I continue?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
10/10/2011  1:05 AM
loweyecue wrote:I don't follow the owners are crap logic. I also don't see what a bunch of revenue numbers prove by themselves, like people have said you need to look at the bottomline, revenue is the top line. Ownwers are in it to make money they don'y owe anybody anything, least of all the fans. (I would rather if this was not the case, but reality is what it is).

Players do have something invested in it too, they have their entire careers and livelihood invested in it. It's not like they can make this type of money anywhere else.

Overall I think the players are extremely greedy and I hate guaranteed contracts the thing should be abolished forever. If all other sports can do without it then so can basketball.

I am sorry I have seen too many Eddy Curry, Jerome James on the bench matches to give a rats *** about players being abused by the system. I call BS on that idea.

Amen!!

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Owners are full of Crap!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy