[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

what's wrong with Melo??
Author Thread
Rookie
Posts: 27025
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

4/18/2011  12:11 PM
I was noticing after the trade that Melo is a good defender...no, Melo is a very good defender....but when he digs in on defense, his offensive production goes down...often hitting the front of the rim prolly due to dead legs. Given the amount of energy he expends on the defensive end, i chock this up to conditioning...but then again, not everybody can put that much energy into both ends and still have fresh legs when it counts...

....so to answer my own question...what's wrong with melo?...he's playing good defense, that's what's wrong with him

AUTOADVERT
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  12:17 PM
he is not in good shape. if he uses much energy on defense, he does not have legs for offense.

he needs to work on his strength.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

4/18/2011  12:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 4/18/2011  12:18 PM
He's a step or two away from his sweet spot. His best shots are the two pointers from either the left or right side. This has been his finishing move. He makes the three pointers early in the game, when he's fresh, but as things go on, he doesn't make the adjustments so his shot hits the front of the rim.
"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/18/2011  12:39 PM
He takes low percentage shots. You have to have amazing talent to be able to hit 45% of the shots that he takes; very few could do that and I think that's why people find him impressive. But a very difficult shot is still worth only 2 points.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  12:45 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:He takes low percentage shots. You have to have amazing talent to be able to hit 45% of the shots that he takes; very few could do that and I think that's why people find him impressive. But a very difficult shot is still worth only 2 points.

indeed. with better trained brain, or with even a drop of intellect, he could be better than jordan.

damn genetics, though.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

4/18/2011  12:48 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:He takes low percentage shots. You have to have amazing talent to be able to hit 45% of the shots that he takes; very few could do that and I think that's why people find him impressive. But a very difficult shot is still worth only 2 points.

One of the best bad shot makers ever but I'm not enamored at his offensive shot making. Even when he's shooting/making 3s it just seems like he's chucking them. When he's moving the ball, passing to teammates(Effries down the lane for a bobble, should be Shelden or Turiaf), making teammates better and defending that's impressive. We already know what he's capable of offensively. Melo is not going to drop 30 every game especially now that the playoffs have started. He's had some very ugly games this year....nothing is wrong with him he is who we thought he was for the most part.

VDesai
Posts: 42743
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
4/18/2011  1:08 PM
He was hot in the 2nd quarter and then rimmed a few out in the third and went cold in the 4th. It was one game and he literally was on fire for the entire last 2 weeks of the season, so I'll just chalk it up to a bad shooting night. I think he made a bad decision at the end of the game, but it was no timeouts and he probably didn't have that great of a feel for how much time was on the clock, and when he saw some space he decided to shoot. I was hoping Boston would foul us as that would've allowed us to re-set after and inbounds play. As it was, Melo missed a wide open Douglas, who had just hit the clutch shot earlier.

I'm not upset about the end of the game as much as I was upset about that decision made on that play. Seemed like no timeouts and we were unprepared, so we just handed the ball to Melo to let him freelance.

orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  1:16 PM
VDesai wrote:He was hot in the 2nd quarter and then rimmed a few out in the third and went cold in the 4th. It was one game and he literally was on fire for the entire last 2 weeks of the season, so I'll just chalk it up to a bad shooting night. I think he made a bad decision at the end of the game, but it was no timeouts and he probably didn't have that great of a feel for how much time was on the clock, and when he saw some space he decided to shoot. I was hoping Boston would foul us as that would've allowed us to re-set after and inbounds play. As it was, Melo missed a wide open Douglas, who had just hit the clutch shot earlier.

I'm not upset about the end of the game as much as I was upset about that decision made on that play. Seemed like no timeouts and we were unprepared, so we just handed the ball to Melo to let him freelance.

what is this but two ugly paragraphs for one word, choke.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
4/18/2011  1:29 PM
VDesai wrote:He was hot in the 2nd quarter and then rimmed a few out in the third and went cold in the 4th. It was one game and he literally was on fire for the entire last 2 weeks of the season, so I'll just chalk it up to a bad shooting night. I think he made a bad decision at the end of the game, but it was no timeouts and he probably didn't have that great of a feel for how much time was on the clock, and when he saw some space he decided to shoot. I was hoping Boston would foul us as that would've allowed us to re-set after and inbounds play. As it was, Melo missed a wide open Douglas, who had just hit the clutch shot earlier.

I'm not upset about the end of the game as much as I was upset about that decision made on that play. Seemed like no timeouts and we were unprepared, so we just handed the ball to Melo to let him freelance.

you know, everyone dogs MDA for not taking more time outs when the Knicks get out of sync. so last night, that's exactly what he does. calls time out when the Celts cut it to 8 in the 3rd. then Billups get hurt and we're forced to take another timeout. now we have no timeouts for the final possession. just an example of how you can't win sometimes.

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
4/18/2011  1:41 PM
He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  1:42 PM
bernard wrote:He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.

lol, come on, friend.

is not off night.

it is giant choke job.

you don't run streak hot for two weeks, and then, wow-- ice bucket cold for first playoff game.

is giant choke, man.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
fishmike
Posts: 53829
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/18/2011  1:43 PM
bernard wrote:He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.
exactly. spot on everything
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Rookie
Posts: 27025
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

4/18/2011  1:54 PM
bernard wrote:He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.

the thread, or atleast what I wrote, was meant to compliment melo on his defensive effort. The question really is...can offensive players expend that much energy playing defense and still make an impact on offense...or do they have to pick their spots...ok now, i'm going to lock down D...now I'm gonna score

orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  1:57 PM
Rookie wrote:
bernard wrote:He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.

the thread, or atleast what I wrote, was meant to compliment melo on his defensive effort. The question really is...can offensive players expend that much energy playing defense and still make an impact on offense...or do they have to pick their spots...ok now, i'm going to lock down D...now I'm gonna score

this is stupid. good ballers can do both. certainly, ballers earning max money can do both.

you try to justify his bum-ness.

this is like trying to justify inner city school failure on lack of funds, when, in fact, these schools get more per pupil than good schools.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
4/18/2011  1:59 PM
Fair enough. I don't see that as the issue. I don't think he was tired -- he didn't play that many minutes because of the fouls in the first -- but the issue as you frame it below is a legitimate one to debate. I'm hoping he'll keep playing tough D through this series and beyond so will have a bigger sample size to evaluate. My gut is it wasn't his D that hurt his offense. But I don't have any evidence of that other than he looked plenty energetic on both sides.

Rookie wrote:
bernard wrote:He won player of the week for two weeks running, carrying the team practically on his own to 7 straight wins. He has a lousy game and we're saying What's wrong w/ Melo? Come on. He cost us the game. No doubt. But that doesn't mean there's something wrong with him, just that he had an off night.

the thread, or atleast what I wrote, was meant to compliment melo on his defensive effort. The question really is...can offensive players expend that much energy playing defense and still make an impact on offense...or do they have to pick their spots...ok now, i'm going to lock down D...now I'm gonna score

Moonangie
Posts: 24765
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

4/18/2011  2:00 PM
He is known to have poor conditioning. He even looked pudgy at he beginning of the season. He needs to work on it this off-season so he can be in shape for the playofs.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
4/18/2011  2:03 PM
he is bitch. period.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Nalod
Posts: 71157
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/18/2011  2:06 PM
Maybe Celts played good defense.

Somtimes you lose.

Somtimes you get beat.

That game was not ours to lose, it was ours to win.

Celts just got it done.

Thats what was wrong with Melo.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/18/2011  2:31 PM
There's nothing wrong with Melo. The C's won't be able to keep holding Melo down for the entire series. I think he'll adjust and break loose. Mike will go over the film with the team and point out what they did wrong on offense and we'll do a better job in the next game.
We can't overreact to one game and assume that Melo is some kind of choke artist.

One thing that would help a lot is to get Melo more catch and shoot off curls and more cuts to the basket where he can go to the hole without the help defenders having time to come over. When he tries to drive from way out on the floor it gives the C's time to collapse and help. This is why he needs to use the system to get open shots. Also if he does get the ball outside he should hold it and let the other Knicks make cuts to the basket and clear out their defender so that he can operate with more space and have passing options if they double him. STAT was patient and used the system. Melo has to do the same and not just barrel into the teeth of the D or take the shot they want him to take. Mike will help him make that adjustment.

knickstorrents
Posts: 21121
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2010
Member: #3050
Hong Kong
4/18/2011  2:32 PM
I forced myself to watch this game and enjoyed it for the most part, until carmelo single handedly decides to lose us the game in the 4th quarter.

We would have been better off with Shawne Williams in there at the end.

Rose is not the answer.
what's wrong with Melo??

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy