[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Up by 3 Pts - Foul or Not Foul?
Author Thread
OjilEye
Posts: 20671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/26/2010
Member: #3017
USA
3/29/2011  12:27 PM
Why fouling is NOT a good idea:

1) There's a chance the opposing player gets THREE foul shots instead of two (this is the obvious one). It can be player savvy (knowing the foul is coming and hoisting up the shot), a bad call from the ref, or a stupid blunder on the defender's part.

2) There's a small chance of facing the worst case scenario of a potential 4-point play, losing the game altogether with no chance of overtime.

3) If you foul, and the 1st FT goes IN, but the 2nd FT wildly caromes off the rim (intentional or not), there is a very real chance the rebound will wind up back in the opposing team's hands. Now, they can WIN the game on a 3-pt shot, or tie it up with a quick putback.

So why foul?

Great defense wins close games period. Relying on Vin Diesel's logic "it don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning's winning" will not get you very far.

AUTOADVERT
Nalod
Posts: 71159
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/29/2011  1:22 PM
Great defense wins close games period. Relying on Vin Diesel's logic "it don't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning's winning" will not get you very far.

More SheenBury like quotes. If your not winning your losing!

islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/29/2011  1:54 PM
Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
martin
Posts: 76227
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/29/2011  1:58 PM
islesfan wrote:Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

Except when he does make a 3 and is fouled at the same time, in which you would call for everyone's head, right?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SlimChin
Posts: 20588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/5/2011
Member: #3363

3/29/2011  2:00 PM
Good idea or bad idea at least get your F'n hands up Jeffries!
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/29/2011  2:07 PM
martin wrote:
islesfan wrote:Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

Except when he does make a 3 and is fouled at the same time, in which you would call for everyone's head, right?

You have to be smart about the foul. If the guy is already going up for the 3 then obviously you don't touch him but there was plenty of time to foul before a player got into a shooting motion.

How often do you see a 4 point play? LJ's was so amazing in part because it NEVER happens in that situation.

If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/29/2011  2:18 PM
I don't think Mike trusts his players who aren't that savvy on D to make the foul at the right time. Jared simply didn't defend and you can't do that. YOu have to at least get a hand up. You go straight up and get in the sight line of the shooter.

I prefer fouling, but I can understand why some coaches don't do it.

Papabear
Posts: 24373
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

3/29/2011  2:57 PM
martin wrote:
islesfan wrote:Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

Except when he does make a 3 and is fouled at the same time, in which you would call for everyone's head, right?

Papabear Says

Look how many bad calls were mane on us. It all wash out in the end.

Papabear
sealy
Posts: 20683
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/1/2010
Member: #3291
USA
3/29/2011  3:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/29/2011  3:09 PM
That play only reaffirmed AGAIN and AGAIN that JJ has no business being in the NBA. I'm sure Earl Barron could be just as overrated as a defender and maybe he could even pull up on his offense a bit to be comparable to JJ.
TheGame
Posts: 26634
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
3/29/2011  7:23 PM
After looking at the play again, I think Jeffries did the right thing not putting his hands up. He was two steps away from Richardson, and Richardson rose up for the shot while Jeffries was still changing directions. If Jeffries puts his hands up, he is far more likely to hit Richardson's elbow and risk getting a foul than he is to affect Richardson's shot. Jeffries mistake was not playing Richardson closer from the start, but he made the right decision not putting his hands up after Richardson was already in the shooting motion.

As far as fouling, I think you have to foul in that situation.

Trust the Process
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
3/29/2011  7:53 PM
TheGame wrote:After looking at the play again, I think Jeffries did the right thing not putting his hands up. He was two steps away from Richardson, and Richardson rose up for the shot while Jeffries was still changing directions. If Jeffries puts his hands up, he is far more likely to hit Richardson's elbow and risk getting a foul than he is to affect Richardson's shot. Jeffries mistake was not playing Richardson closer from the start, but he made the right decision not putting his hands up after Richardson was already in the shooting motion.

As far as fouling, I think you have to foul in that situation.

You NEVER EVER foul in that situation. All it takes is 1 FT and an offensive put back and the game is tied.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

3/29/2011  9:18 PM
Nope.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
3/29/2011  9:26 PM
All it takes is for a player to shoot a 3 (and it go in) and the game is tied. :)

Maybe D'Antoni is not confident of his team's ability to track rebounds off free throws.

CashMoney wrote:
TheGame wrote:After looking at the play again, I think Jeffries did the right thing not putting his hands up. He was two steps away from Richardson, and Richardson rose up for the shot while Jeffries was still changing directions. If Jeffries puts his hands up, he is far more likely to hit Richardson's elbow and risk getting a foul than he is to affect Richardson's shot. Jeffries mistake was not playing Richardson closer from the start, but he made the right decision not putting his hands up after Richardson was already in the shooting motion.

As far as fouling, I think you have to foul in that situation.

You NEVER EVER foul in that situation. All it takes is 1 FT and an offensive put back and the game is tied.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/29/2011  9:29 PM
islesfan wrote:
martin wrote:
islesfan wrote:Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

Except when he does make a 3 and is fouled at the same time, in which you would call for everyone's head, right?

You have to be smart about the foul. If the guy is already going up for the 3 then obviously you don't touch him but there was plenty of time to foul before a player got into a shooting motion.

How often do you see a 4 point play? LJ's was so amazing in part because it NEVER happens in that situation.


Totally agree. Fouling smart is the right move. The worst thing that could happen by not fouling did happen.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
fishmike
Posts: 53829
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/30/2011  7:56 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
islesfan wrote:
martin wrote:
islesfan wrote:Why fouling IS a good idea:

1) Jason Richardson's 3 that tied the game.

Except when he does make a 3 and is fouled at the same time, in which you would call for everyone's head, right?

You have to be smart about the foul. If the guy is already going up for the 3 then obviously you don't touch him but there was plenty of time to foul before a player got into a shooting motion.

How often do you see a 4 point play? LJ's was so amazing in part because it NEVER happens in that situation.


Totally agree. Fouling smart is the right move. The worst thing that could happen by not fouling did happen.

no.. the worse is a 4 point play. Or two easy shots with a chance to get the ball back on a tip, etc.
Sure.. the four point play is rare. 3 FTs arent the norm either, but you concede points with the clock stopped and you still have to execute by in bounding the ball, hitting your own FTs, etc
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
3/30/2011  9:58 AM
In my opinion, you only foul if you can do so on the catch of the inbounds pass or if the player catching the ball isn't facing the hoop (if he catches going away, you can wait a second or two to foul) so there's no chance of a 3 pt shooting foul being called. This obviously means you're not able to allow much time to tick off. So, I'd only foul with 3 secs or fewer on the clock. There were about 10 secs in Monday's game. Way too much time to foul intentionally, imo. If you do, got to assume opposition will hit both shots, then they foul us on the inbounds pass, and even if we hit both of our shots, we're basically in the same situation as before our first intentional foul. Do we keep doing this strategy two or three times? Not a good percentage play -- we may miss a foul shot eventually.

All that said, I've seen lot's of late 3 pointers to tie games. Trying to remember a time I've seen the intentional foul strategy blow up.

BigRedDog
Posts: 22192
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
3/30/2011  1:08 PM
TheGame wrote:After looking at the play again, I think Jeffries did the right thing not putting his hands up. He was two steps away from Richardson, and Richardson rose up for the shot while Jeffries was still changing directions. If Jeffries puts his hands up, he is far more likely to hit Richardson's elbow and risk getting a foul than he is to affect Richardson's shot. Jeffries mistake was not playing Richardson closer from the start, but he made the right decision not putting his hands up after Richardson was already in the shooting motion.

As far as fouling, I think you have to foul in that situation.

You are kidding me, right??? This had to be one of the WORST defensive plays ever. Jeffries is SO over-rated defensively. On that play all he had to do was defend the 3 pter. If you look at the play Jeffries starts going back to defend the drive and then stops and watches the play. NO defense at all. Even the announcers were saying he had to at least put up his hands. Man does Jeffries SUCK.

fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
martin
Posts: 76227
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/30/2011  1:37 PM
BigRedDog wrote:
TheGame wrote:After looking at the play again, I think Jeffries did the right thing not putting his hands up. He was two steps away from Richardson, and Richardson rose up for the shot while Jeffries was still changing directions. If Jeffries puts his hands up, he is far more likely to hit Richardson's elbow and risk getting a foul than he is to affect Richardson's shot. Jeffries mistake was not playing Richardson closer from the start, but he made the right decision not putting his hands up after Richardson was already in the shooting motion.

As far as fouling, I think you have to foul in that situation.

You are kidding me, right??? This had to be one of the WORST defensive plays ever. Jeffries is SO over-rated defensively. On that play all he had to do was defend the 3 pter. If you look at the play Jeffries starts going back to defend the drive and then stops and watches the play. NO defense at all. Even the announcers were saying he had to at least put up his hands. Man does Jeffries SUCK.

Hahn's take?:

Jared Jeffries got caught off-balance on Jason Richardson's move and thought it was better to hold himself back rather than risk fouling Richardson by putting a hand up on the shot, which, of course, he hit with 5.7 seconds left to tie.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Up by 3 Pts - Foul or Not Foul?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy