[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What Planet Is Walsh On ? He Sez We are now starting to play our Big Men!! Who?? We don't have any.
Author Thread
Papabear
Posts: 24379
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

3/22/2011  8:59 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/22/2011  9:02 AM
Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Papabear
AUTOADVERT
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
3/22/2011  10:13 AM
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Knicksfan
Posts: 33517
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
3/22/2011  10:15 AM
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Knicks_Fan
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
3/22/2011  10:16 AM
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
Knicksfan
Posts: 33517
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
3/22/2011  10:23 AM
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

Knicks_Fan
NYKBocker
Posts: 38455
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
3/22/2011  10:34 AM
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

Yup Yup

martin
Posts: 78324
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
3/22/2011  10:46 AM
NYKBocker wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

Yup Yup

I hate to say it, but on a team whose bigs depth is decimated (Bucks) and another team who has a need for bigs (Phoenix), Barron got scant minutes. Neither team signed him past the 10 day contracts. No idea why but neither team saw potential in him.

Very strange.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
NYKBocker
Posts: 38455
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
3/22/2011  10:56 AM
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

Yup Yup

I hate to say it, but on a team whose bigs depth is decimated (Bucks) and another team who has a need for bigs (Phoenix), Barron got scant minutes. Neither team signed him past the 10 day contracts. No idea why but neither team saw potential in him.

Very strange.

PHX only needed him as a stop gap while their bigs got healthy. They now have Frye, Gortat and Lopez back in the mix at center. With the Bucks, they needed him the same way. A stop gap until the players got healthy. They have Bogut, Sanders, Gooden and Mbah a Moute now.

but...His numbers were also not that impressive in his stint with both teams.

Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
3/22/2011  11:36 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/22/2011  11:38 AM
We gave Sheldon Williams 2:46 min last night, if that is what Walsh is referring to?
Sheldon is our biggist Big, weightwise, at 250lbs and 6'9"
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/22/2011  12:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/22/2011  12:10 PM
If they brought in Barron and actually played him anywhere close to 30 mins, starting or not, he'd produce here..Hello? HE DID IT BEFORE, in this system..Why couldn't he do it again? Light years a better player than Jared Jeffries. LIGHT YEARS..I said it on the other Barron thread this morning---he ain't Hakeem Olajuwon, that's for sure, but he's a true big man that can rebound the ball, score it when needed and flat out FORTIFY our frontline..Dude's an actual big man for Christ's sake..Instant upgrade over Jeffries & the Landlord and even better than Turiaf too...If it we're up to me, I'd buy out Shelden Williams today and have Barron in the orange & blue for tomorrow night's game against Howard.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/22/2011  12:18 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/22/2011  1:37 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

Yup Yup

I hate to say it, but on a team whose bigs depth is decimated (Bucks) and another team who has a need for bigs (Phoenix), Barron got scant minutes. Neither team signed him past the 10 day contracts. No idea why but neither team saw potential in him.

Very strange.

PHX only needed him as a stop gap while their bigs got healthy. They now have Frye, Gortat and Lopez back in the mix at center. With the Bucks, they needed him the same way. A stop gap until the players got healthy. They have Bogut, Sanders, Gooden and Mbah a Moute now.

but...His numbers were also not that impressive in his stint with both teams.

Yeah, maybe because he received 15 and 12 mins respectively in these last two stops...What kinda gaudy numbers is he putting up in 12 mins per??? He got double the PT in NY last year in that 7-game stint for us and PRODUCED -- over 33 mins per, 11.7 ppg, 11 rebs, 76% FTs (that's another thing, Jeffries can't even hit a Goddamn FT!!)...I'd sign him right now and GUARANTEE that same PT and possibly even the starting C spot, with respect to Turiaf..The man's a no-brainer addition right now.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/22/2011  6:18 PM
Finestrg wrote:If they brought in Barron and actually played him anywhere close to 30 mins, starting or not, he'd produce here..Hello? HE DID IT BEFORE, in this system..Why couldn't he do it again? Light years a better player than Jared Jeffries. LIGHT YEARS..I said it on the other Barron thread this morning---he ain't Hakeem Olajuwon, that's for sure, but he's a true big man that can rebound the ball, score it when needed and flat out FORTIFY our frontline..Dude's an actual big man for Christ's sake..Instant upgrade over Jeffries & the Landlord and even better than Turiaf too...If it we're up to me, I'd buy out Shelden Williams today and have Barron in the orange & blue for tomorrow night's game against Howard.

i agree i think Barron is a better bet than Jeffries at least he has some semblence of an ability to put the ball in the basket & can grab boards in the paint... whenever Jeffries is on the floor we're playing 4 on 5 offensively.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/22/2011  6:26 PM
I think the Knicks need to bring Barron in. I like Turiaf but when you are reading about how the Knicks are hoping his new orthotic will protect his knee so that he can play more I think it is time to bring someone other than Jeffries in. Barron seems like he would be a good fit based on last year and there is no risk signing him.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
3/22/2011  6:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/22/2011  6:29 PM
Finestrg wrote:If they brought in Barron and actually played him anywhere close to 30 mins, starting or not, he'd produce here..Hello? HE DID IT BEFORE, in this system..Why couldn't he do it again? Light years a better player than Jared Jeffries. LIGHT YEARS..I said it on the other Barron thread this morning---he ain't Hakeem Olajuwon, that's for sure, but he's a true big man that can rebound the ball, score it when needed and flat out FORTIFY our frontline..Dude's an actual big man for Christ's sake..Instant upgrade over Jeffries & the Landlord and even better than Turiaf too...If it we're up to me, I'd buy out Shelden Williams today and have Barron in the orange & blue for tomorrow night's game against Howard.
Sheldon Williams is a back-up PF. Barron is a back-up C. We need them both. Neither is going to put us over the hump but each can help. Sheldon W has played OK when given the chance. Cut someone else.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Juice
Posts: 21742
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2009
Member: #2968

3/22/2011  6:51 PM
I just think there's some bitterness on our part when we tried to offer him an extension last year and he declined. There's no reason to think if you wanted him long term last year at a bargain rate then obviously you can claim him off waivers at even a better bargain.

It's sad when agendas get in the way of making decisions


Then again maybe our GM may be afraid if he claims another useful player off waivers the coach will make him look bad and not play him.

loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

3/22/2011  8:13 PM
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

And why is Barron available again?

TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/22/2011  8:15 PM
loweyecue wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

And why is Barron available again?


The same reason Jeffries was. However, he fits the Knicks needs more in my opinion.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
3/22/2011  8:18 PM
loweyecue wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

And why is Barron available again?

I guess the organization can hope that Turiaf's new orthotic knee support is effective enough to let Turiaf play 20 minutes a game for the remainder of the season and the playoffs. That seems like a sound plan?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

3/22/2011  8:52 PM
No idea what that has to do with Barron being cut by team that depeartely need bigs, but whatever.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
Knicksfan
Posts: 33517
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
3/22/2011  9:59 PM
loweyecue wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Knicksfan wrote:
CashMoney wrote:
Papabear wrote:Papabear Says


"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."

Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg

I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.

Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.

Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.

Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.

If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.

And why is Barron available again?

Who cares why? He is and he can help us. Roll the dice with him, like we will be waiving a star to give him a place here.

Knicks_Fan
What Planet Is Walsh On ? He Sez We are now starting to play our Big Men!! Who?? We don't have any.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy