NYKBocker wrote:martin wrote:NYKBocker wrote:Knicksfan wrote:CashMoney wrote:Knicksfan wrote:CashMoney wrote:Papabear wrote:Papabear Says
"We have 15 players, we’re not playing big guys a lot, we’re starting to play them now, I want to see how that goes and see where that fits in," Walsh said. "I don’t know that we would cut somebody right now in order to bring him in."
Read more: http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/212432/Walsh_Not_Ready_To_Make_Earl_Barron_A_Knick#ixzz1HKfz4dZg
I can name 5 players he can cut to bring in a big man. Maybe they have a thing against big men.
Nah just a thing against big men who aren't any good.
Totally right. That's why we brought Jeffries.
Unfortunately, JJ is the best of the worst.
If Barron plays anywhere close to how he played last time he was with us, he will be miles away better than Jeffries. And by the way, Jeffries may be 6'11" but he is no big man. Barron is.
Yup Yup
I hate to say it, but on a team whose bigs depth is decimated (Bucks) and another team who has a need for bigs (Phoenix), Barron got scant minutes. Neither team signed him past the 10 day contracts. No idea why but neither team saw potential in him.
Very strange.
PHX only needed him as a stop gap while their bigs got healthy. They now have Frye, Gortat and Lopez back in the mix at center. With the Bucks, they needed him the same way. A stop gap until the players got healthy. They have Bogut, Sanders, Gooden and Mbah a Moute now.
but...His numbers were also not that impressive in his stint with both teams.
Yeah, maybe because he received 15 and 12 mins respectively in these last two stops...What kinda gaudy numbers is he putting up in 12 mins per??? He got double the PT in NY last year in that 7-game stint for us and PRODUCED -- over 33 mins per, 11.7 ppg, 11 rebs, 76% FTs (that's another thing, Jeffries can't even hit a Goddamn FT!!)...I'd sign him right now and GUARANTEE that same PT and possibly even the starting C spot, with respect to Turiaf..The man's a no-brainer addition right now.