[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Have the Knicks lost a game w/out Houston????
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
MaTT4281
Posts: 34884
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
2/4/2004  3:51 PM
This season, every game Houston sat out...have we lost any of them???
AUTOADVERT
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
2/4/2004  4:39 PM
Posted by MaTT4281:

This season, every game Houston sat out...have we lost any of them???
i think we have lost like 2 of them
MaTT4281
Posts: 34884
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
2/4/2004  6:16 PM
Posted by Caseloads:
Posted by MaTT4281:

This season, every game Houston sat out...have we lost any of them???
i think we have lost like 2 of them

Now that u bring it up, i think houston sat out @ LA. thats the only 1 i can remember
s3231
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #544
USA
2/4/2004  7:01 PM
Posted by MaTT4281:
Posted by Caseloads:
Posted by MaTT4281:

This season, every game Houston sat out...have we lost any of them???
i think we have lost like 2 of them

Now that u bring it up, i think houston sat out @ LA. thats the only 1 i can remember
On the road trip we had earlier in the year Houston didn't play when we lost in Golden State, LA (Lakers), and in Utah. He also didn't play when we lost to Chicago at the Garden.
"This is a very cautious situation that we're in. You have to be conservative in terms of using your assets and using them wisely. We're building for the future." - Zeke (I guess not protecting a first round pick is being conservative)
MaTT4281
Posts: 34884
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
2/4/2004  7:33 PM
Posted by s3231:
Posted by MaTT4281:
Posted by Caseloads:
Posted by MaTT4281:

This season, every game Houston sat out...have we lost any of them???
i think we have lost like 2 of them

Now that u bring it up, i think houston sat out @ LA. thats the only 1 i can remember
On the road trip we had earlier in the year Houston didn't play when we lost in Golden State, LA (Lakers), and in Utah. He also didn't play when we lost to Chicago at the Garden.

Well that just blows my topic apart
Nalod
Posts: 71162
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/5/2004  10:11 AM
Some of those games Van horn was out, or playing hurt to help depleted offense (pre-marbury).

We are more athletic without Allan, and thats a plus.

But Allan is not going anywhere, so lets not even think it.

WE are not athletic at the PF or the C. That is where we can get it done.
MaseInYourFace
Posts: 20437
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2004
Member: #546
Canada
2/5/2004  10:28 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Some of those games Van horn was out, or playing hurt to help depleted offense (pre-marbury).

We are more athletic without Allan, and thats a plus.

But Allan is not going anywhere, so lets not even think it.

WE are not athletic at the PF or the C. That is where we can get it done.


i don't think allan is going anywhere either--mostly because who wants his contract? but im sure zeke is open to trading him if he could find some good return--say in like the 4 and 5 :)

maybe the van gundy would like to trade yao? id be down for that trade.
Yes! - Marv Albert
martin
Posts: 76237
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/8/2004  11:26 AM
just putting a cap on this thread:

"The Knicks are 6-4 overall this season without Houston but only one of those victories - Tuesday vs. Indiana - has come against a team with a winning record."

From NY Daily News.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
subzero0
Posts: 21244
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/24/2003
Member: #410
2/8/2004  11:27 PM
I think its pretty obvious we need Houston. The problem is that we have not been using him as we should. The offense should not be going through him as it was in Chaney's system. In Chaney's system Allan gets the ball and goes one on one, while everyone stands and looks on. If he gets double teamed he kicks the ball out - an easy play to draw up and an even easier one to defend against.

Wilkens should understand this and make the necessary adjustment to have all the plays run through Stephon Marbury, Penny Hardaway, Frank Williams and no one else.
CanadianKnicksFan
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2003
Member: #483
Canada
2/8/2004  11:33 PM
And your point is?
Pure Starks Love
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/8/2004  11:33 PM
Posted by subzero0:

I think its pretty obvious we need Houston. The problem is that we have not been using him as we should. The offense should not be going through him as it was in Chaney's system. In Chaney's system Allan gets the ball and goes one on one, while everyone stands and looks on. If he gets double teamed he kicks the ball out - an easy play to draw up and an even easier one to defend against.

Wilkens should understand this and make the necessary adjustment to have all the plays run through Stephon Marbury, Penny Hardaway, Frank Williams and no one else.
I actually think we do not need Houston. I think he adds some extra firepower to our offense and I will take it for sure but I reallyt dont think we NEED him like you say.

I really hate how he just refuses to rebound the ball of find open players. He is 6'6!! Why does he just always say, "No, I will not rebound"!!! Van Gundy tried, Chaney tried and now Lenny is trying but Houston only wants to jumpshoot!! And lets give him a max contract and kill our cap....!
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
« Reply To Topic
Have the Knicks lost a game w/out Houston????
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy