sc was making the thread, i am gathering, in general, because of the rampant raging about how bad the deal is from some fans from the moment it was made, and even before...
i mean, if before the end of last season started you said we'd have melo and amar'e and we had to give up the same pieces i don't believe so many of us would be mad.
anyway, this is never going to end for the time being...the disagreements about valuation of players we had vs. got.
i think gallo has been a disappointment this year. wilson improved, but ceiling limted. mozgov, possibly good, but no superstar. melo, not as bad as the advanced stats folks (who i am often highly supportive of, sometimes mistakenly so...read: zach randolph and his amazing outside shooting for a big man) have suggested is likely. (why so-called objective stats have to be taken into qualitative context, and some quant folks may be less impressed with).
anyway, we've been over some of the other points, wilson gone anyway if want melo as a fa, the cba paradox, not having the pieces the nets had so always at their mercy, melo wanting to be paid now, amar'e an injury risk/? mark in a few years with his knee, etc. etc. as why i supported a get melo now approach.
anyway, s'all good...this is our team 4 better of 4 worse...4 now...we'll see how it pans out...
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...