[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Berger Update: Knicks giving up their 2014 pick not Minnesota's pick
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/20/2011  4:43 PM

Knicks make final offer for Melo
Posted on: February 20, 2011 3:41 pm
Edited on: February 20, 2011 4:24 pmScore: 191
Log-in to rate:Log-in to rate: Log-in to rate: LOS ANGELES -- The Knicks have made what was described as their final trade proposal for Carmelo Anthony Sunday, pushing the months-long drama toward its merciful conclusion, CBSSports.com has learned.

The Knicks would send three starters -- Wilson Chandler, Danilo Gallinari, and Raymond Felton -- to Denver for Anthony, Chauncey Billups, Shelden Williams and Anthony Carter, sources said Sunday. The Nuggets would get the Knicks' first-round pick in 2014, while Minnesota would get Eddy Curry's expiring contract and Anthony Randolph from New York. Curry would then be waived, and the Knicks would send as much as $3 million to Minnesota to pay his freight. Carter must approve the trade and waive his Bird rights for the deal to be approved.

Confident that a Friday night meeting between Anthony, his representatives, and a Nets contingent led by Russian owner Mikhail Prokhorov and hip-hop mogul Jay-Z did not result in a commitment from Anthony to sign an extension with New Jersey, the Knicks are drawing the line. They are not offering rookie Landry Fields or Russian center Timofey Mozgov, two pieces Denver has asked for at various times in the negotiations, sources said.

The Anthony drama now rests in the hands of Nuggets executives Josh Kroenke and Masai Ujiri, who must decide whether to accept the Knicks' offer, continue pursuing other avenues, or keep Anthony beyond Thursday's trade deadline.

As the Knicks' pursuit of Anthony reached a tipping point Sunday, the team released a joint statement from Madison Square Garden chairman James Dolan, president Donnie Walsh, and coach Mike D'Antoni saying all three were in agreement on the Anthony discussions. In a rare and obscure step, the statement also asserted that "no one from outside our organization" was involved in the Anthony process -- an obvious reference to former team president Isiah Thomas, whose input Dolan has received since Thomas was replaced by Walsh in 2008.

With so many agendas and obfuscation attempts at play, it was difficult to predict Sunday how Denver would respond. But Nuggets executives have signaled that they want a resolution to the Anthony matter by the end of All-Star weekend -- a timetable that Anthony publicly stated that he favored, as well.

Just as the Knicks' negotiating strategy was sidetracked by Dolan's decision to get involved in the negotiations and meet with Anthony Thursday night in Los Angeles, so have the Nuggets' efforts been influenced by agendas affecting their still complicated hierarchy. Sources say Denver's reluctance to deal with New York throughout the process was prompted more by a feeling among some segments of the team's power structure that they should not give Anthony what he wants -- a three-year, $65 million extension with the team of his choice. But sources also assert it will be difficult for Denver to turn down what could be the best offer they will receive for Anthony -- one that gives them a quality point guard, Felton, on a better contract than the Nets' Devin Harris; a young, promising frontcourt player, Chandler, who is more polished than New Jersey's Derrick Favors; a hard-nosed, floor-spacing shooter, Gallinari, instead of multiple first-round picks from New Jersey whose ultimate value is undetermined; and $20 million in immediate savings.

The Nuggets' basketball staff is said to have preferred the Nets' long-standing offer centered around Favors and multiple picks, which would set the team up for a long-term rebuilding process -- whereas the Knicks' offer provides assets better suited to a quicker turnaround after Anthony's departure. But the Nets' competing offer ran its course with Friday night's obligatory meeting between Anthony and New Jersey officials, which CBSSports.com reported was allowed as a condition of Anthony receiving permission to meet with Dolan on Thursday.
http://ken-berger.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/11838893/27587236

I didn't see anything about the Knicks getting a pick back from Minny in this new scenario either. In my opinion this is worse than the prior report of the deal with Minny's pick.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
stanleybostitch
Posts: 20731
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/7/2006
Member: #1071

2/20/2011  4:48 PM
Maybe we get Ridnour? There has to be something going from Minny to either NY or DEN.
The new new core: Randle, RJ, IQ. Maybe Mitch. Future pick. Future trade. Future FA.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/20/2011  4:48 PM
Doesn't Minnesota have to send something of value back to NY for it to be a trade? I don't understand this part of the deal.
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
2/20/2011  4:49 PM
Does this mean that the Knicks are giving Denver 2 #1 picks???

That makes no sense at all, Felton, Gallo and Chandler should be enough for a player that has no other suiters that he will sign for.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/20/2011  4:49 PM
The term drawing a line is almost comical...Giving up only one, either Gallo or Chandler,not swapping Felton for Billups and not throwing in 2014 ist rounder is drawing a line...
firefly
Posts: 23226
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
2/20/2011  4:52 PM
I'm putting myself on the record to say I like the deal as constructed above, notwithstanding that the Minny deal makes no sense and is either not happening or is giving us Minnys pick this year.

Anthony Carter is an underrated part of the deal IMO and he will be very usefull here and TD will be able to spend his minutes at SG.

I don't like losing Gallo but he's really the only loss, what with the Felton-Billups shortterm swap and the loss of Chandler regardless and I therefore consider it the cost of doing business.

I really hope this us a take-it-or-leave-it deal. If Denver says no now, it's time to move on.

Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

2/20/2011  4:52 PM
I really hate the cloudiness of these trades much the like the LB and Isiah moves(Reezy, and J. Rose)...I would really love to know who is packaging these deals...
TheGame
Posts: 26634
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/20/2011  4:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/20/2011  5:05 PM
I don't understand why we would give up Randolph if we are not getting a pick from Minny. If we give Minny $3 mill, then pretty much most of Curry's remaining salary would be paid by us. Why give them Randolph unless we are getting a pick back? We need to get at least a protected first round pick or two second round picks from Minny.
Trust the Process
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
2/20/2011  5:01 PM
Thank you Isiah and Dolan!
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/20/2011  5:01 PM
I just read that Minny is giving up a trade exception. So it seems we get that or Denver I'm not sure.
spreeeewell
Posts: 20286
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/20/2003
Member: #436
2/20/2011  5:20 PM
Who knows? Maybe Walsh has a deal with Minnesotta and another team. cause we have to get something back if we are sending Curry and Randolph to Minnie. And by the way. WHERE IS TMS?
I'd rather die on my feet, than live on my knees!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
2/20/2011  5:21 PM
anyone but Sheldon Williams.

useless

once a knick always a knick
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
2/20/2011  5:21 PM
misterearl wrote:anyone but Sheldon Williams.

useless

He's a good rebounder and defender.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/20/2011  5:27 PM
spreeeewell wrote:Who knows? Maybe Walsh has a deal with Minnesotta and another team. cause we have to get something back if we are sending Curry and Randolph to Minnie. And by the way. WHERE IS TMS?

Read Nalod's Starphuch guide thread. TMS stated he was leaving because of it and Martin's support of it. A lot of really good posterss are leaving this forum. I hope the trend stops.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
2/20/2011  5:30 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
spreeeewell wrote:Who knows? Maybe Walsh has a deal with Minnesotta and another team. cause we have to get something back if we are sending Curry and Randolph to Minnie. And by the way. WHERE IS TMS?

Read Nalod's Starphuch guide thread. TMS stated he was leaving because of it and Martin's support of it. A lot of really good posterss are leaving this forum. I hope the trend stops.

Nobody else I know left.

TMS is always dramatic and getting into arguments with everyone.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

2/20/2011  5:33 PM
TheGame wrote:I don't understand why we would give up Randolph if we are not getting a pick from Minny. If we give Minny $3 mill, then pretty much most of Curry's remaining salary would be paid by us. Why give them Randolph unless we are getting a pick back? We need to get at least a protected first round pick or two second round picks from Minny.

So it would seem that we can't even get Denver to take on Curry in this deal, and instead of trading Randolph for a #1, we are giving him to Minny so they will take Curry's contract, AND, we are basically paying Minny to take on Randolph and Curry... perhaps getting a trade exception.

Seems to me that we are being pretty generous to Denver, who has a star who no longer wants to play with them, and Minny, who is getting $3M, a young player who may still have an upside, and an expiring contract.

There are 4 "players" in involved, and 3 of them- Denver, Minny, and Melo, seem to be winners, while the Knicks, who thought they might be getting a FA star next summer for the cost of a contract, are fleeced for at least 3 starters, a prospect (Randolph) $3m, and OUR OWN 2014 #1.

Yeah, thank god Isiah Dolan stepped in to bring a little sanity to these negotiations.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

2/20/2011  5:34 PM
TheGame wrote:I don't understand why we would give up Randolph if we are not getting a pick from Minny. If we give Minny $3 mill, then pretty much most of Curry's remaining salary would be paid by us. Why give them Randolph unless we are getting a pick back? We need to get at least a protected first round pick or two second round picks from Minny.

Why would Minnesota agree to take Curry?

You think they're just going to do the Knicks a favor?

Denver doesn't want to take Curry back because it has huge luxury tax implications for them. Knicks need to rid themselves of Curry to make the cap math work, so they need someone with the means to take him off their hands.

Randolph is the cost of Minny giving the Knicks what few other teams in the NBA can.

Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

2/20/2011  5:35 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/20/2011  5:37 PM
spreeeewell wrote:Who knows? Maybe Walsh has a deal with Minnesotta and another team. cause we have to get something back if we are sending Curry and Randolph to Minnie. And by the way. WHERE IS TMS?

Bitter feud...http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=38091&page=1

(did not see earlier post)

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/20/2011  5:46 PM
Paladin55 wrote:
TheGame wrote:I don't understand why we would give up Randolph if we are not getting a pick from Minny. If we give Minny $3 mill, then pretty much most of Curry's remaining salary would be paid by us. Why give them Randolph unless we are getting a pick back? We need to get at least a protected first round pick or two second round picks from Minny.

So it would seem that we can't even get Denver to take on Curry in this deal, and instead of trading Randolph for a #1, we are giving him to Minny so they will take Curry's contract, AND, we are basically paying Minny to take on Randolph and Curry... perhaps getting a trade exception.

Seems to me that we are being pretty generous to Denver, who has a star who no longer wants to play with them, and Minny, who is getting $3M, a young player who may still have an upside, and an expiring contract.

There are 4 "players" in involved, and 3 of them- Denver, Minny, and Melo, seem to be winners, while the Knicks, who thought they might be getting a FA star next summer for the cost of a contract, are fleeced for at least 3 starters, a prospect (Randolph) $3m, and OUR OWN 2014 #1.

Yeah, thank god Isiah Dolan stepped in to bring a little sanity to these negotiations.

If you want to look at the bright side--I am happy that Fields and Mosgov will be staying. I thought for sure that they were done 4. The trade to me is gallo for Carmelo. We were going to lose Chandler and while he doesnt run the style of play--Billuops is more of a big time player in clutch spots than felton. the bottom line is they are both signed for 2 years. randolph=0 to the Knicks and well ahev to pay a pick in 2014--but hopefully it will be 20 or so--something we could buy.

the fact that we are keeping fields is big. Lets just do this deal--this deal I can live with. Lets hope we can turn our attention to a secondary deal where we can get a Dalembart or somebody like that--maybe Jefferies if he is bought out. We need quality depth upfront not named shelden williams. if we get an exemption--move it to Sacramento get landry at a minimum--reading today they need the $$

RIP Crushalot😞
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/20/2011  5:50 PM
This would give us


C-Mosgov

F amare

F Melo

G Fields

G Billups

6 Douglas


Can donnie go get me Grant Hill and Dalembart?we need a 2nd/3rd move. If we are going to go for it--go for it!!

RIP Crushalot😞
Berger Update: Knicks giving up their 2014 pick not Minnesota's pick

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy